[SI] Intetesting is up!

On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:35:25 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:
: Annika1980 wrote:
: On Sep 8, 10:17 pm, Helen wrote:
:
: http://i491.photobucket.com/albums/r...r/contactsheet...
:
: A scan of the contact sheet. It was clearly my mistake that I stated
: the wrong exposure and ISO. I was using 2 film cameras that day.
:
:
: I guess Anal Browne's apology will be forthcoming.
:
: Hey Brownie, what does that ISO 100 do to your calculations?
: Let's see, you had it pegged at 1/500 @ ISO 1600, right?
: Hmmmm, 4 stops difference ..... that's about 1/30 @ ISO 100 if my math
: is right.
: In other words, exactly as Helen said.
:
: She punked you out.
:
: No. She claimed it was at ISO 1600. That did not wash for a "shaky
: shot" as claimed even if the aperture was stopped down to f/16.
:
: Not that anyone else picked up on it.

Not that anyone else gave a crap.

Bob

On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:01:23 +1000, Bob Larter
wrote:

Eric Stevens wrote:
Here is one whose progress I am following.
http://www.warbirdrestoration.co.nz/...january08.html

Look at the photographs.

To me, THAT'S INTERESTING. :-)

You've got to give them props (sorry!) for taking on such a big project.

Virtually all the woodwork has been built from new. So too has been
much of the metal work.

The work is being done for a US owner and I have to say that I am
concerned at the fact that the last reports were dated 31 Mar 2008. Is
this restoration another casualty of the stock-market crash?

In any case, here is another one which you might find worth following:
http://www.lightning422supporters.co.uk/



Eric Stevens