A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 18th 06, 12:03 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens

Hi Group,

I am finally going to make the jump from APS (Nikon Proena 600i) to
Digital and I am looking at either the Nikon D70 or the D200 bodies.
Basically the prices I am paying for prints will cover the camera body
over a two year s(D200), so I am reviewing the lens range and the
costs.

I have numerous lens such as the AF ED 70-300mm f/4-f/5.6D. To use
either the D70 or D200 do I need an adapter to use this lens. The
reason I ask is I asked two reseller and one said yes the other said
no. BTW, what is this lens like at 300mm on the D70 or D200?

I have searched Nikons web site and I cannot find an answer to such a
basic question.

I know that all the IX lens will not work, so I am up for the cost in
this range. But I see as a chance to upgrade.

Thanks

Mark

  #3  
Old April 18th 06, 06:59 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens


wrote in message
ups.com...
Hi Group,

I am finally going to make the jump from APS (Nikon Proena 600i) to
Digital and I am looking at either the Nikon D70 or the D200 bodies.
Basically the prices I am paying for prints will cover the camera body
over a two year s(D200), so I am reviewing the lens range and the
costs.

I have numerous lens such as the AF ED 70-300mm f/4-f/5.6D. To use
either the D70 or D200 do I need an adapter to use this lens. The
reason I ask is I asked two reseller and one said yes the other said
no. BTW, what is this lens like at 300mm on the D70 or D200?

I have searched Nikons web site and I cannot find an answer to such a
basic question.

I know that all the IX lens will not work, so I am up for the cost in
this range. But I see as a chance to upgrade.

Thanks

Mark


From my own personal experience I won't get into now, don't settle for the
D70s as I did. Get the way better camera and you won't kick yourself like I
am doing.

Keith


  #4  
Old April 18th 06, 07:11 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens

ilaab wrote
(in article ):
From my own personal experience I won't get into now, don't settle for the
D70s as I did. Get the way better camera and you won't kick yourself like I
am doing.


I'd like to hear why you are "kicking yourself" over it.



--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw





  #5  
Old April 18th 06, 08:58 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens


"Randy Howard" wrote in message
. net...
ilaab wrote
(in article ):
From my own personal experience I won't get into now, don't settle for
the
D70s as I did. Get the way better camera and you won't kick yourself like
I
am doing.


I'd like to hear why you are "kicking yourself" over it.


Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

Because I know me and I settled. My grandmother told me that I would be
wasting my money settling for something lesser if what I could get what I
really desired. Of course that meant within reason. She knew I would not be
happy and would eventually get my first choice which would in turn, cost the
additional expense. I would love to have a D2X but that is not reasonable
because of my income...and wife. I really wanted the D200 but didn't want
to wait for its release(I ordered my D70s in December 2005). I reasoned
that I would get the lesser camera and put more into lenses. So therefore,
I'm "kicking myself" because I knew better. Also, I didn't realize the D70s
only went down to 200 ISO. If Mrs. Moneybags allows, I will attempt a D200
next year.

Keith


  #7  
Old April 18th 06, 09:17 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens

ilaab wrote
(in article ) :


"Randy Howard" wrote in message
. net...
ilaab wrote
(in article ):
From my own personal experience I won't get into now, don't settle for
the
D70s as I did. Get the way better camera and you won't kick yourself like
I
am doing.


I'd like to hear why you are "kicking yourself" over it.


Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw


FYI, you're newsreader is broken, it's supposed to trip
signatures. Instead, it seems to have cropped out the delimiter
itself, namely the "-- " on a line by itself.

Because I know me and I settled. My grandmother told me that I would be
wasting my money settling for something lesser if what I could get what I
really desired. Of course that meant within reason. She knew I would not be
happy and would eventually get my first choice which would in turn, cost the
additional expense.


In general it is cheaper to buy the best product available and
buy it once rather than buy it plus a cheaper "mistake".
However, you don't bother to tell us what the critical flaw is
in the D70s that makes it a mistake.

I would love to have a D2X but that is not reasonable
because of my income...and wife.


SWMBO, yes.

I really wanted the D200 but didn't want
to wait for its release(I ordered my D70s in December 2005). I reasoned
that I would get the lesser camera and put more into lenses.


Not a bad approach, actually.

So therefore, I'm "kicking myself" because I knew better. Also, I didn't
realize the D70s only went down to 200 ISO.


You find something wrong with shooting at 200 instead of 100?
It's not like there is a lot of noise in the image taken at 200.
You better have a good tripod in that limited budget if ISO 100
vs. 200 is enough to make you upset.

Is that the only thing? Apart from that, you haven't mentioned
anything else technical in nature that would make you kick
yourself over the purchase.

If Mrs. Moneybags allows, I will attempt a D200 next year.


At least we know who wears the pants. :-)


--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw





  #8  
Old April 19th 06, 12:12 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens

On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Randy Howard wrote:

In general it is cheaper to buy the best product available and
buy it once rather than buy it plus a cheaper "mistake".
However, you don't bother to tell us what the critical flaw is
in the D70s that makes it a mistake.


Maybe in general, but not always. I remember some years back in
rec.photo.digital people would post asking how to get their pictures into
the computer. The response was always go buy a card reader. At that time
the Sandisk Imagemate was around $30. But one fellow would always pipe up
and argue that you should buy a muiti-card reader, even though you didn't
need it at the time. They were around $80. Now those were all USB 1, and
slow, so those buying more than they needed wasted their money. Multi-card
readers with USB 2 can now be had for $12 or so.

Don www.donwiss.com/pictures/ (e-mail link at page bottoms).
  #9  
Old April 19th 06, 01:16 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens

Don Wiss wrote
(in article ):

On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Randy Howard wrote:

In general it is cheaper to buy the best product available and
buy it once rather than buy it plus a cheaper "mistake".
However, you don't bother to tell us what the critical flaw is
in the D70s that makes it a mistake.


Maybe in general, but not always. I remember some years back in
rec.photo.digital people would post asking how to get their pictures into
the computer. The response was always go buy a card reader. At that time
the Sandisk Imagemate was around $30. But one fellow would always pipe up
and argue that you should buy a muiti-card reader, even though you didn't
need it at the time. They were around $80. Now those were all USB 1, and
slow, so those buying more than they needed wasted their money. Multi-card
readers with USB 2 can now be had for $12 or so.


You are changing the discussion by introducing time, and the
resultant price compression. You can (almost) always find
better products at equal or better prices later in time,
especially when the time is "some years back".

I'm personally not into "future proofing" for things I don't
currently and might not ever need, so I won't defend the guy
recommending the combo reader years ago. Instead, I tend to buy
the very best example of a product family that I want today, and
then I don't waste time feeling bad about it when something
better comes along down the road.

--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw





  #10  
Old April 19th 06, 04:06 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Nikon D70 / D200 with 1998 Nikkor Lens

According to ilaab :

"Randy Howard" wrote in message
. net...


[ ... ]

Because I know me and I settled. My grandmother told me that I would be
wasting my money settling for something lesser if what I could get what I


[ ... ]

I would love to have a D2X but that is not reasonable
because of my income...and wife.


Ditto.

I really wanted the D200 but didn't want
to wait for its release(I ordered my D70s in December 2005).


Well ... when I got *my* D70, the alternative (in my budget
range) was the D100, and looking at the specs of the two, I found the
D70 to be the better choice -- for less money.

I am now very tempted by the D200, and just handled one at the
local photo store yesterday. I like several of its features, and may
wind up springing for it. But in the meanwhile, I've taken *lots* of
photos with the D70 -- which I would never have been able to take if I
had known the D200 was going to eventually come out, and decided to wait
for it.

Now -- you already had the D200 as an option -- albeit with some
wait factor involved -- so you got to decide whether to wait for a known
product, or to buy what was available already.

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon D200 and Canon 350D/Rebel XT Noise Tests wayne Digital Photography 1 April 4th 06 10:57 PM
Free Online Video for Nikon D200 on Auto Exposure and Auto Focus Lock [email protected] Digital Photography 0 April 3rd 06 10:17 PM
Nikon Capture 4 on a Mac...ARRRGH!!!! Amr Digital SLR Cameras 9 October 30th 05 07:04 PM
FS: 8 Nikon lenses including 80-200 Nikkor 2.8 zoom and accessories Henry Peña 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 November 11th 03 07:20 PM
Nikon F4s, F90x, 20,60,85,105,35-70,80-200 tony 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 October 19th 03 10:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.