A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

scanning negatives - resolution



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 13th 05, 08:33 PM
freightcar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default scanning negatives - resolution

i would like to scan all my negatives to have digital copy of all my photos.
when I came to lab I asked them to scan them in 2400 dpi. i sure sounded
like an idiot, because they obviously scan only in 300 dpi :-) but my point
is, 25x36 (cm) in 300 dpi equals 9.84x 14.17 inch and that is 2952 x 4251
pixels. if I want to scan negative in this resolution it actually is 4251 /
1.41in (36mm) eq 3014 dpi. this ~ 3000 dpi is actually an optical resolution
of the scanner. so it is a really different if you scan at 1200, 2400 or
3000 dpi. is that so the scanner always use same optical resolution and the
result is sized by the software? am I completely wrong? can someone bring
more light here?
thank you


  #2  
Old November 13th 05, 10:09 PM
Marvin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default scanning negatives - resolution

freightcar wrote:
i would like to scan all my negatives to have digital copy of all my photos.
when I came to lab I asked them to scan them in 2400 dpi. i sure sounded
like an idiot, because they obviously scan only in 300 dpi :-) but my point
is, 25x36 (cm) in 300 dpi equals 9.84x 14.17 inch and that is 2952 x 4251
pixels. if I want to scan negative in this resolution it actually is 4251 /
1.41in (36mm) eq 3014 dpi. this ~ 3000 dpi is actually an optical resolution
of the scanner. so it is a really different if you scan at 1200, 2400 or
3000 dpi. is that so the scanner always use same optical resolution and the
result is sized by the software? am I completely wrong? can someone bring
more light here?
thank you


Scanning negatives at 300 dpi isn't good enough. Find another lab.
  #3  
Old November 14th 05, 08:10 PM
kctan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default scanning negatives - resolution

The confusion here is DPI. It is better to work in pixel's dimensions. First
you must know the maximum optical scanning DPI or PPI is more precise. Let
assume 4000 PPI and this is known as max input PPI. Your source is 35mm
negative so for full frame scan is 24x36mm (1x1.5 inches). Apply max input
PPI will give you 1 x 4000 and 1.5 x 4000 = 4000 x 6000 PPI (pixel's
dimensions). Now come to image output PPI and 300 is more than sufficient
for printing. So 4000/300 PPI and 6000/300 PPI will give you print size
13.33 x 20 inches. Remember don't confuse image input and output PPI also
don't confuse image output PPI and printing output DPI. Your lab probably
give you image output PPI 300 which is correct.

"freightcar" . wrote in message
. ..
i would like to scan all my negatives to have digital copy of all my
photos. when I came to lab I asked them to scan them in 2400 dpi. i sure
sounded like an idiot, because they obviously scan only in 300 dpi :-) but
my point is, 25x36 (cm) in 300 dpi equals 9.84x 14.17 inch and that is
2952 x 4251 pixels. if I want to scan negative in this resolution it
actually is 4251 / 1.41in (36mm) eq 3014 dpi. this ~ 3000 dpi is actually
an optical resolution of the scanner. so it is a really different if you
scan at 1200, 2400 or 3000 dpi. is that so the scanner always use same
optical resolution and the result is sized by the software? am I completely
wrong? can someone bring more light here?
thank you




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8Mp Digital The Theoretical 35mm Quality Equivelant Matt 35mm Photo Equipment 932 December 17th 04 09:48 PM
scanning negatives Mike - EMAIL IGNORED 35mm Photo Equipment 12 November 27th 04 07:31 AM
New UK slide scanning service launched Chris Todhunter Digital Photography 6 November 20th 04 11:32 AM
New UK slide scanning service launched Chris Todhunter Film & Labs 6 November 20th 04 11:32 AM
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? Toralf 35mm Photo Equipment 274 July 30th 04 12:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.