If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote:
On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. ~~ That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq...ykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 -- PeterN |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On Oct 20, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq5fp8f/Bucket-O-Keykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 As we all know, other than the occasional (usually accidental) goof, that sort of stuff is not for me. Sometimes I will use other effects, but not many which would fit your particular vision. ;-) -- Regards, Savageduck |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On 10/20/2017 10:36 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 20, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq5fp8f/Bucket-O-Keykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 As we all know, other than the occasional (usually accidental) goof, that sort of stuff is not for me. Sometimes I will use other effects, but not many which would fit your particular vision. ;-) It would be a very boring world if we all liked the same type of art, or food. -- PeterN |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On 10/20/2017 9:59 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. ~~ That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq...ykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 OK, no question the Duck is not a fan of that kind of treatment. I did a bunch of variations and like this one as an abstraction. The original photo was from my neighbor's phone. The quality was too low to pull out a good realistic photo. ~ Um, are you really surprised that the nursing administrators wouldn't respond well to that jab? ;-) -- == Later.... Ron C -- |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On 10/20/2017 10:48 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 10/20/2017 10:36 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 20, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq5fp8f/Bucket-O-Keykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 As we all know, other than the occasional (usually accidental) goof, that sort of stuff is not for me. Sometimes I will use other effects, but not many which would fit your particular vision. ;-) It would be a very boring world if we all liked the same type of art, or food. +1 -- == Later... Ron C -- |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:59:54 -0400, PeterN
wrote: On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. ~~ That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq...ykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 I *like* it! -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On 11-Oct-17 9:25 AM, David_B wrote:
Well, live and learn! :-) I've never before heard of "metro-recreation"! Just for fun, I took a 'drive' down Higuera St. I'm truly amazed by the technology of today! OrĀ* https://goo.gl/LYQEG9 Thanks for enlightening me, Savageduck! David. Oh! I forgot to ask. Is that where you live now that you've retired? -- David B. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On 10/20/2017 9:59 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. ~~ That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq...ykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 I had to go back and review my image and think about why I like it. For me it's all about the kabuki mask quality of cat's expression; it totally cracks me up. That's totally a YMMV thing. Anyway, goes to your premise: ...would be boring if we all liked the same things. :-) -- == Later... Ron C -- |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On 10/20/2017 11:17 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:59:54 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. ~~ That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq...ykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 I *like* it! Thank you. That image was intended as a fun poke at head nurses. It was not intended to be taken seriously. I have too much respect for most members of the nursing profession. -- PeterN |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Reason for an image, was ( Care for Some Gum?)
On 10/21/2017 10:10 PM, Ron C wrote:
On 10/20/2017 9:59 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 9:24 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 7:37 PM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 1:48 PM, Ron C wrote: On 10/20/2017 10:47 AM, PeterN wrote: On 10/20/2017 12:30 AM, Ron C wrote: snip For what little it's worth: Summer's gone .. here's my current Halloween twitter header: https://www.dropbox.com/s/89qs7etjg5...20%233A%20.jpg Very imaginative and well executed. I like it. Fits Halloween perfectly. Thanks. Thought you might like it. As I've said before, what matters is if you like it. If you have a vision, and execute it to your satisfaction, that's what it is all about. I get that, but in a way it feels a bit too self centered. When I mixed live sound I always did it to enhance the audience experience. At the end of the night I had the satisfaction that I had served well. Audience response allowed me to evaluate my tweaks. When on stage acting it was never about me, but about connecting. ~~ That said, my neighbor sent me an odd shot of my cat taken with her phone. I gave it a rather extreme artistic work-over. I'm not sure if I'm seeking an audience or adapting to the one at hand. Anyway, I'll throw it out for an audience response: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qp19vpusxq...ykat-3B%27.jpg I hope the Duck is sitting down. The way I look at it, a glow-electrification treatment should somehow blend and enhance the image. I just don't see that in your image. Here is an example of what I mean: Most of my nurse friends love it. The nursing administrators, without a sense of humor, don't. https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3ec75bxvw1288r/Head%20Nurse.jpg?dl=0 I had to go back and review my image and think about why I like it. For me it's all about the kabuki mask quality of cat's expression; it totally cracks me up. That's totally a YMMV thing. Anyway, goes to your premise: ...would be boring if we all liked the same things. :-) *-- == Later... Ron C I'm glad you did not take my comment as a personal insult. It was not intended as anything but my opinion of one particular image. That you like it, is really all that counts. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Care For Some Gum? | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 1 | November 5th 14 04:13 PM |
Does anybody really care . . . | Russell D. | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | August 26th 12 04:16 AM |
Why to care for our customers?? | Gungun | Digital Photography | 0 | March 20th 08 02:01 AM |
Negatran Care | John Rice | In The Darkroom | 1 | April 11th 06 06:01 AM |
The care of lenses | John | Large Format Photography Equipment | 3 | February 2nd 04 09:59 PM |