Substitute for Tech Pan?

Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

Uranium Committee ha scritto:
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

I can't help you with that but you may try Bluefire Police, see
http://www.frugalphotographer.com for details.

--
Registered user at http://counter.li.org # 170453
Jabber JID:
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 10E0 2B05 0B0A 3525 8760 788B 59B6 C74A 250E 65B6

Uranium Committee ha scritto:
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

I can't help you with that but you may try Bluefire Police, see
http://www.frugalphotographer.com for details.

--
Registered user at http://counter.li.org # 170453
Jabber JID:
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 10E0 2B05 0B0A 3525 8760 788B 59B6 C74A 250E 65B6

(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

Motion Picture film. Are you or are you not the total dumb **** that
spewed mega amounts of **** all over someone else for experimenting
with motion picture film?

You are a ****ing IDIOT and TOTALLY WORTHLESS. Why don't you figure
it out and realize you are not needed, wanted, liked, or tolerated in
ANY rec.photo groups anymore.

GO THE **** AWAY YOU TOTAL DIP****!!!

(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

Motion Picture film. Are you or are you not the total dumb **** that
spewed mega amounts of **** all over someone else for experimenting
with motion picture film?

You are a ****ing IDIOT and TOTALLY WORTHLESS. Why don't you figure
it out and realize you are not needed, wanted, liked, or tolerated in
ANY rec.photo groups anymore.

GO THE **** AWAY YOU TOTAL DIP****!!!

(Plutonium Committee) wrote in message . com...
(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

Motion Picture film. Are you or are you not the total dumb **** that
spewed mega amounts of **** all over someone else for experimenting
with motion picture film?

Yes, but that was COLOR FILM, you ****wit! Motion Picture color films
take a different process and have incompatible masks and anti-halation
backings, you dumbass. B&W Motion Picture films do not have these
problems, ****face.



You are a ****ing IDIOT and TOTALLY WORTHLESS. Why don't you figure
it out and realize you are not needed, wanted, liked, or tolerated in
ANY rec.photo groups anymore.

GO THE **** AWAY YOU TOTAL DIP****!!!

(Plutonium Committee) wrote in message . com...
(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

Motion Picture film. Are you or are you not the total dumb **** that
spewed mega amounts of **** all over someone else for experimenting
with motion picture film?

Yes, but that was COLOR FILM, you ****wit! Motion Picture color films
take a different process and have incompatible masks and anti-halation
backings, you dumbass. B&W Motion Picture films do not have these
problems, ****face.



You are a ****ing IDIOT and TOTALLY WORTHLESS. Why don't you figure
it out and realize you are not needed, wanted, liked, or tolerated in
ANY rec.photo groups anymore.

GO THE **** AWAY YOU TOTAL DIP****!!!

Hi

Originally Tech Pan replaced 5469 High Contrast Copy film sometime in the early
80's. It was really not a replacement since HCC had about 25% more resolution.
Kodak felt that the 100% more speed of TP was more important then 25% less
resolution of HCC.

Anyway, Kodak still made 5460 AHU Microfilm whick was almost identical to 5469
HCC. But unlike HCC, it only came in 100 ft 35mm rolls and 20 rolls was the
minimum order at $8 a roll in 1985.

Not sure if 5460 is still being made. Banks mostly used it to copy checks. It
was also the main film for microfish,

Larry

Hi

Originally Tech Pan replaced 5469 High Contrast Copy film sometime in the early
80's. It was really not a replacement since HCC had about 25% more resolution.
Kodak felt that the 100% more speed of TP was more important then 25% less
resolution of HCC.

Anyway, Kodak still made 5460 AHU Microfilm whick was almost identical to 5469
HCC. But unlike HCC, it only came in 100 ft 35mm rolls and 20 rolls was the
minimum order at $8 a roll in 1985.

Not sure if 5460 is still being made. Banks mostly used it to copy checks. It
was also the main film for microfish,

Larry

(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
(Plutonium Committee) wrote in message . com...
(Uranium Committee) wrote in message . com...
Would this work?

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/pr....4.6.6.8&lc=en

Motion Picture film. Are you or are you not the total dumb **** that
spewed mega amounts of **** all over someone else for experimenting
with motion picture film?

Yes, but that was COLOR FILM, you ****wit! Motion Picture color films
take a different process and have incompatible masks and anti-halation
backings, you dumbass. B&W Motion Picture films do not have these
problems, ****face.



And I quote:

"Use conventional film and quite farting around with this ****.
Cimenmatographers are even stupider than still photographers. Moron."

Makes you a moron as well! No wonder your wife left you for that
little spanish girl. ****, you even made her swap over to be a dyke!
I just have two questions for you Asslicker. Was sex with the waffle
boy really the best you ever had, and did you really need to put syrup
on it?

And I repeat, as I am talking to a complete ****ing stupid asshole
moron:

GO THE **** AWAY YOU TOTAL DIP****!!!

You are so ****ing stupid you can't even spell cinematographer. What
you spelled must make hot cross buns at the mall...

Die you scum licking putrid *******. Your mama should let daddy ****
her in the ass the night you were conceived. Oh, sorry, she did...