A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » Film & Labs
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Wal-Mart's Online Photo Center - Change for the worse



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 23rd 04, 07:53 PM
Joe Pucillo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wasn't it Bill Tuthill who said...
Can anyone recommend other photo processing dealers that have an
interface for downloading developed 35mm pictures from the internet?


Ofoto.com does this, although not for "full resolution" scans.


Clark Color Labs (District Photo) can also do this, allowing 30
days for download of "hi resolution" (about 250ppi) files for an
extra buck, I think. You can find their mailers in just about
any Sunday newspaper.

I use them for my 7 year-old daughter's film, and APS images come
back "hi-res" at 1692x968 px. Given the size of the APS
negatives, you can infer that 35mm scans would either be
~3000x2000 or 1500x1000. Maybe they have info on their site:
clarkcolor.com



--
Joe Pucillo
Baltimore, Maryland USA

To reply by email, please remove the .xx
  #12  
Old December 24th 04, 05:00 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Tuthill wrote:

In rec.photo.film+labs O.B. wrote:

Can anyone recommend other photo processing dealers that have an
interface for downloading developed 35mm pictures from the internet?



Ofoto.com does this, although not for "full resolution" scans.


the years. At one time, I remember that [Walmart's] overnight film
development used Kodak processing. Excellent pictures. At some point
they switched to Fuji and the pictures have become extremely grainy.



That's not grain, it's pixellation from scanning on a Fuji Frontier
digital minilab. Some people think it makes their pictures look sharper.
Others, like you, don't like it. The Agfa d-Lab.2 scans at 400 dpi
instead of 300 dpi, so pixellation is less of an issue.


Hang on... the print dpi may be 300/400, but certainly not the scan dpi. I've
been told that for MF FujiFrontier can scan 3000x2000 (for, I assume 35mm).


Cheers,
Alan


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  #13  
Old December 24th 04, 05:00 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Tuthill wrote:

In rec.photo.film+labs O.B. wrote:

Can anyone recommend other photo processing dealers that have an
interface for downloading developed 35mm pictures from the internet?



Ofoto.com does this, although not for "full resolution" scans.


the years. At one time, I remember that [Walmart's] overnight film
development used Kodak processing. Excellent pictures. At some point
they switched to Fuji and the pictures have become extremely grainy.



That's not grain, it's pixellation from scanning on a Fuji Frontier
digital minilab. Some people think it makes their pictures look sharper.
Others, like you, don't like it. The Agfa d-Lab.2 scans at 400 dpi
instead of 300 dpi, so pixellation is less of an issue.


Hang on... the print dpi may be 300/400, but certainly not the scan dpi. I've
been told that for MF FujiFrontier can scan 3000x2000 (for, I assume 35mm).


Cheers,
Alan


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  #14  
Old December 26th 04, 06:01 PM
dooey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"fika" wrote in message
news
Once upon a time, Alan Browne wrote:


Hang on... the print dpi may be 300/400, but certainly not the scan dpi.
I've been told that for MF FujiFrontier can scan 3000x2000 (for, I

assume
35mm).


The Frontier usually scans at about 2 megapixels, more or less. You can
ask it to scan at about 16 megapixels, but apparently this takes a long
time. The lab near me will do high resolution scans only during slow
periods.

Seasons Greetings.



The Frontier scans to make the output 300dpi at the print size. However,
the standard FDI CD is almost always 300dpi at 6x4 (1800x1200). If you want
a higher resolution a Pro CD can be made at up to 300dpi at 10x15
(4500x3000).



--
Dooey


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Online photo storage with EXIF data? Renee Digital Photography 5 July 3rd 04 07:17 AM
How do I center a photo on a page? Brian Kendig Digital Photography 4 July 1st 04 06:11 PM
Online Photo Albums Ray Normandeau Digital Photography 5 June 26th 04 06:07 PM
Free online photo album offer. Ron Large Format Photography Equipment 0 March 3rd 04 02:16 PM
Win an online photo gallery or other prizes Mathias Schaust Jr. Advanced Photography 0 November 19th 03 05:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.