If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
The Pentax K Series cameras are a little past their 1/2 year (K10) and 1
year (K100D, K110D) times-on-market. How about some hand-on owner's impression of these cameras? - Oveall quality - Operating ease - Picture Quality - Practical K-Mount utility - Quirks (lotsa stuff about jpg processing, etc. What is real?) - Happy, Mad? - Etc. Thanks RonB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
"RonB" wrote: The Pentax K Series cameras are a little past their 1/2 year (K10) and 1 year (K100D, K110D) times-on-market. How about some hand-on owner's impression of these cameras? Not me, but a friend I respect highly is a very happy Pentax user. - Oveall quality - Operating ease - Picture Quality - Practical K-Mount utility - Quirks (lotsa stuff about jpg processing, etc. What is real?) - Happy, Mad? The things he's saying in favor of the system include the image stabilization (it just works, with every lens, even the long ones, despite what we Canonistas say) and the wide selection of lenses, including many incredibly compact primes. He likes it so much, he went out and bought a Pentax 645 system! The only problem with Pentax is that they have not yet announced a full-frame camera. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
David J. Littleboy wrote:
The only problem with Pentax is that they have not yet announced a full-frame camera. I thought that they'd announced a 645 digital, thus better/larger than 35mm. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
"frederick" wrote in message news:1177554824.18068@ftpsrv1... David J. Littleboy wrote: The only problem with Pentax is that they have not yet announced a full-frame camera. I thought that they'd announced a 645 digital, thus better/larger than 35mm. Yes. But it's more than 10 times more expensive than the cameras the OP asked about, so I ignored it. (More accurately, didn't even think about it.) FWIW and IMHO, MF digital is problematic. Since the unit sales are so small, the technology is nowhere near as mature as APS-C or 24x36mm dSLR technology. Also, it's not "full frame", so has wide angle problems. And since sensor fabrication costs go up exponentially with area, it's never going to be cheap. So it's largely a fantasy for real people. At US$2500 or so, 24x36 digital is "affordable" to anyone who can afford a car, although most will not chose to spend that much on a camera. David J. Littleboy Who has a 5D and an L5, but no car, in Tokyo, Japan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
David J. Littleboy wrote:
"frederick" wrote in message news:1177554824.18068@ftpsrv1... David J. Littleboy wrote: The only problem with Pentax is that they have not yet announced a full-frame camera. I thought that they'd announced a 645 digital, thus better/larger than 35mm. Yes. But it's more than 10 times more expensive than the cameras the OP asked about, so I ignored it. (More accurately, didn't even think about it.) FWIW and IMHO, MF digital is problematic. Since the unit sales are so small, the technology is nowhere near as mature as APS-C or 24x36mm dSLR technology. Also, it's not "full frame", so has wide angle problems. And since sensor fabrication costs go up exponentially with area, it's never going to be cheap. So it's largely a fantasy for real people. At US$2500 or so, 24x36 digital is "affordable" to anyone who can afford a car, although most will not chose to spend that much on a camera. Yeah - but that US$2,500 is still 5 times more than an "entry" dslr, and there's only minor differences in IQ. (yeah - I sound like Ken Rockwell). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
"frederick" wrote:
David J. Littleboy wrote: So it's largely a fantasy for real people. At US$2500 or so, 24x36 digital is "affordable" to anyone who can afford a car, although most will not chose to spend that much on a camera. Yeah - but that US$2,500 is still 5 times more than an "entry" dslr, and there's only minor differences in IQ. Exactly. Unless one needs 12x18 and larger prints that are going to be compared with medium and large format, or one needs sharp images at wide apertures in low light, or one needs tilt, shift, or extreme wide angle, the 10MP entry level dSLRs are fine. I suspect, though, that the next generation of the 5D will probably provide a larger step up from APS-C. (Since the new 1DmkIII sensor technology implies a 16MP 5DmkII.) David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
David J. Littleboy wrote:
"frederick" wrote: David J. Littleboy wrote: So it's largely a fantasy for real people. At US$2500 or so, 24x36 digital is "affordable" to anyone who can afford a car, although most will not chose to spend that much on a camera. Yeah - but that US$2,500 is still 5 times more than an "entry" dslr, and there's only minor differences in IQ. Exactly. Unless one needs 12x18 and larger prints that are going to be compared with medium and large format, or one needs sharp images at wide apertures in low light, or one needs tilt, shift, or extreme wide angle, the 10MP entry level dSLRs are fine. I suspect, though, that the next generation of the 5D will probably provide a larger step up from APS-C. (Since the new 1DmkIII sensor technology implies a 16MP 5DmkII.) You are probably right, but having seen some (even compressed jpegs) from 39mp H3d, 1ds II 35mm frame size isn't "full frame" any more. ;-) Some time not so far away, Canon will need some new tricks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:18:32 +0900, David J. Littleboy wrote:
"frederick" wrote: David J. Littleboy wrote: So it's largely a fantasy for real people. At US$2500 or so, 24x36 digital is "affordable" to anyone who can afford a car, although most will not chose to spend that much on a camera. Yeah - but that US$2,500 is still 5 times more than an "entry" dslr, and there's only minor differences in IQ. Exactly. Unless one needs 12x18 and larger prints that are going to be compared with medium and large format, or one needs sharp images at wide apertures in low light, or one needs tilt, shift, or extreme wide angle, the 10MP entry level dSLRs are fine. I suspect, though, that the next generation of the 5D will probably provide a larger step up from APS-C. (Since the new 1DmkIII sensor technology implies a 16MP 5DmkII.) David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan Canon have that technology already although it is pricy - 1Ds mkll -- Neil reverse 'r' and'a' - delete 'l' for email |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
On Apr 25, 9:50 pm, "David J. Littleboy" wrote:
"frederick" wrote in messagenews:1177554824.18068@ftpsrv1... David J. Littleboy wrote: The only problem with Pentax is that they have not yet announced a full-frame camera. I thought that they'd announced a 645 digital, thus better/larger than 35mm. Yes. But it's more than 10 times more expensive than the cameras the OP asked about, so I ignored it. (More accurately, didn't even think about it.) FWIW and IMHO, MF digital is problematic. Since the unit sales are so small, the technology is nowhere near as mature as APS-C or 24x36mm dSLR technology. Also, it's not "full frame", so has wide angle problems. And since sensor fabrication costs go up exponentially with area, it's never going to be cheap. So it's largely a fantasy for real people. At US$2500 or so, 24x36 digital is "affordable" to anyone who can afford a car, although most will not chose to spend that much on a camera. David J. Littleboy Who has a 5D and an L5, but no car, in Tokyo, Japan It's a wonder you can afford *any* sort of camera, wot with the cost of living in Tokyo! -- YOP... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions
"Nervous Nick" wrote: On Apr 25, 9:50 pm, "David J. Littleboy" wrote: "frederick" wrote in messagenews:1177554824.18068@ftpsrv1... David J. Littleboy wrote: So it's largely a fantasy for real people. At US$2500 or so, 24x36 digital is "affordable" to anyone who can afford a car, although most will not chose to spend that much on a camera. David J. Littleboy Who has a 5D and an L5, but no car, in Tokyo, Japan It's a wonder you can afford *any* sort of camera, wot with the cost of living in Tokyo! No car, no kids. Lots of guitars and cameras. But the cost of living here is only bad if one insists on living like an American. There are 124 million people here (including our CEO) who know how to find things at sensible prices. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SMC Pentax-M & -A series lens schematics | Malcolm Stewart | 35mm Photo Equipment | 8 | April 5th 05 04:19 PM |
GROUP: Opinions and info regarding PENTAX IST D/DS and Kit lens - Ken | Ken Ellis | Digital SLR Cameras | 10 | December 6th 04 07:46 PM |
Any Opinions on Cokin Filters for my Pentax 67 | James Dunn | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 6 | October 24th 04 12:14 AM |
FA: Pentax AF400FTZ Flash for 645 Series MF & SFX/SF1 SLR | Bob M | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | April 17th 04 05:38 PM |
FA: Pentax AF400FTZ Flash for 645 Series MF & SFX/SF1 SLR | Bob M | Medium Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | April 17th 04 04:59 PM |