If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
thanks for all your explains and that actually made me in the way of
understanding. now, another question poped up in my mind: how to map a 18% point ( or a mid-tone point ) in a 1 to 255 scale in digital photo file? there are four possible answers i can guess, 1, 255/2 = 128 2, 255*0.18 = 45 3, 0.18^(1/2.2)*255 = 117 4, 0.5^(1/2.2)*255 = 186 which one is right? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
On Nov 26, 1:21 pm, "Douglas" wrote:
"David J. Littleboy" wrote in ... "Steven Woody" wrote: why 18% gray is in the mid of the full scale of brightness from darkest to brightest? what's the math behind it? While the "logarithmic" answer people have given is correct, it's easier to see if you remember that a one stop difference means a twice the brightness. So if you have mid-gray at 18%, you get five (that's all, folks) useful tones on a print: 4.5%, 9%, 18%, 36%, and 72%. If you toss in 0% and 100%, that makes 7 (although you probably won't be able to see the difference between 4.5% and 0). David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan Perhaps a usefulness not yet explained or stated is for matching colour. I use a white, black and grey card (home made) in the first shot of a scene. I use it with the "levels" function of Photoshop and so far (maybe 1000 frames) it works better than nearly any other post shoot white balance. I don't believe digital photography has the same use for a grey card as film shooters have. Douglas I'm too lazy to look it up now, but weren't the definitions for ASA and ISO speeds based on an exposure just above the toe of the characteristic curve? I always assumed the 18% value was related to that. On the other hand, didn't the ISO for digital speed try to stick as close to that for film speed as possible? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
Don Stauffer in Minnesota wrote in
: On Nov 26, 1:21 pm, "Douglas" wrote: "David J. Littleboy" wrote in ... "Steven Woody" wrote: why 18% gray is in the mid of the full scale of brightness from darkest to brightest? what's the math behind it? While the "logarithmic" answer people have given is correct, it's easier to see if you remember that a one stop difference means a twice the brightness. So if you have mid-gray at 18%, you get five (that's all, folks) useful tones on a print: 4.5%, 9%, 18%, 36%, and 72%. If you toss in 0% and 100%, that makes 7 (although you probably won't be able to see the difference between 4.5% and 0). David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan stuff sniped One other reason I've not seen mentioned yet is that it's the level all our exposure meters, even the ones in our digital cameras are set to "see". That is if you expose a white or black object with you built in meter, it tries to give you an expose that will make it 18% gray. So including a gray card will give you something to set your meter by. John Passaneau |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
On Nov 27, 11:16 pm, Don Stauffer in Minnesota
wrote: On Nov 26, 1:21 pm, "Douglas" wrote: "David J. Littleboy" wrote in ... "Steven Woody" wrote: why18% gray is in the mid of the full scale of brightness from darkest to brightest? what's the math behind it? While the "logarithmic" answer people have given is correct, it's easier to see if you remember that a one stop difference means a twice the brightness. So if you have mid-gray at18%, you get five (that's all, folks) useful tones on a print: 4.5%, 9%,18%, 36%, and 72%. If you toss in 0% and 100%, that makes 7 (although you probably won't be able to see the difference between 4.5% and 0). David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan Perhaps a usefulness not yet explained or stated is for matching colour. I use a white, black and grey card (home made) in the first shot of a scene. I use it with the "levels" function of Photoshop and so far (maybe 1000 frames) it works better than nearly any other post shoot white balance. I don't believe digital photography has the same use for a grey card as film shooters have. Douglas I'm too lazy to look it up now, but weren't the definitions for ASA and ISO speeds based on an exposure just above the toe of the characteristic curve? I always assumed the18% value was related to that. what i can remember is the 0.1 plus filmbase + fog density on which the ISO speed was based. On the other hand, didn't the ISO for digital speed try to stick as close to that for film speed as possible? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
On Nov 27, 12:13 pm, Steven Woody wrote:
thanks for all your explains and that actually made me in the way of understanding. now, another question poped up in my mind: how to map a18% point ( or a mid-tone point ) in a 1 to 255 scale in digital photo file? there are four possible answers i can guess, 1, 255/2 = 128 2, 255*0.18 = 45 3, 0.18^(1/2.2)*255 = 117 4, 0.5^(1/2.2)*255 = 186 which one is right? any clue? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:20:58 -0800 (PST), Steven Woody
wrote: On Nov 27, 12:13 pm, Steven Woody wrote: thanks for all your explains and that actually made me in the way of understanding. now, another question poped up in my mind: how to map a18% point ( or a mid-tone point ) in a 1 to 255 scale in digital photo file? there are four possible answers i can guess, 1, 255/2 = 128 2, 255*0.18 = 45 3, 0.18^(1/2.2)*255 = 117 4, 0.5^(1/2.2)*255 = 186 which one is right? any clue? I don't understand the question. I know "poped" means to make holier, but what does "in digital photo file" mean? And how is 255 supposed to relate to a percent? Ed |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
Steven Woody wrote:
On Nov 27, 12:13 pm, Steven Woody wrote: thanks for all your explains and that actually made me in the way of understanding. now, another question poped up in my mind: how to map a18% point ( or a mid-tone point ) in a 1 to 255 scale in digital photo file? there are four possible answers i can guess, 1, 255/2 = 128 2, 255*0.18 = 45 3, 0.18^(1/2.2)*255 = 117 4, 0.5^(1/2.2)*255 = 186 which one is right? any clue? Here's a table that might interest you. The two columns marked "Levels" list the number of levels that fstop range is divided into; hence, in the brightest zone an image from 12-bit linear data can have 2048 distinctly different values for brightness, while in an 8-bit gamma corrected image there are 69 possible distinct levels in that zone. Fstop | Linear Linear Gam.Cor. Gam.Cor. Gam.Cor. | 12 bit Analog Analog 8 bit 8 bit Range | Levels Value Value Value Levels ------|----------------------------------------------- 1 | 2048 1.0 1.0 255 69 2 | 1024 0.5 0.72974 186 50 3 | 512 0.25 0.53252 136 37 4 | 256 0.125 0.38860 99 27 5 | 128 0.0625 0.28358 72 20 6 | 64 0.03125 0.20694 53 14 7 | 32 0.015625 0.15101 38 10 8 | 16 0.007812 0.11020 28 8 9 | 8 0.003906 0.08042 21 6 10 | 4 0.001953 0.05868 15 4 11 | 2 0.0009765 0.04282 11 3 12 | 1 0.0004883 0.03125 8 2 The useful dynamic range basically ends when one full fstop is divided into fewer than 8 values. Hence a 12-bit linear data set has about a 9 stop useful dynamic range, while an 8-bit gamma corrected data set has about an 8 stop range. (With fewer than 8 levels the quantization distortion becomes too apparent, and the results are referred to as "posterized".) To answer your question above requires knowing where you are going to set the white and the black points of the "display" (paper or monitor). For example, when printing on paper with a 5 fstop dynamic range, the printer would normally be adjusted to make 255 be "white" and 52 black. The middle zone, 3, would have values ranging from 100 to 136. Does "3, 0.18^(1/2.2)*255 = 117" look grey to you? -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
Steven Woody writes:
thanks for all your explains and that actually made me in the way of understanding. now, another question poped up in my mind: how to map a 18% point ( or a mid-tone point ) in a 1 to 255 scale in digital photo file? there are four possible answers i can guess, 1, 255/2 = 128 2, 255*0.18 = 45 3, 0.18^(1/2.2)*255 = 117 4, 0.5^(1/2.2)*255 = 186 #1 would be correct if the file used 8-bit linear coding, but nobody does that because 8 bits simply doesn't give enough dynamic range or intensity resolution in the shadow areas. On the other hand, 16-bit linear coding is sometimes used. #2 makes no sense to me. #3 is close to correct assuming a particular exposure (see below). The nonlinear function y = x^(1/2.2) is how intensity is encoded in video, in JPEG files, and lots of other places. This is generally not adjustable, nor not adjustable very much. #4 tells you what you'd expect to find in the image file for a scene brightness of 50% of peak (e.g. one stop down), not 18%. Now more about exposu You or the camera has a choice of what brightness in the image gets considered "1.0" and mapped to 255 in the file. Since images have areas of widely varying reflectance illuminated by different amounts of light, 255 doesn't necessarily represent "100% reflectance"; it's just the brightest tone that the camera has decided to handle. So the "0.18" in this expression is best regarded as "0.18 times peak white in this photo", not any absolute reflectance. It's actually more complex, too, because cameras may depart from this power function in the highlight and/or shadow areas in order to capture more brightness range at lower contrast in those areas. The "shoulder" and "toe" in film response does the same thing in chemical photography. Since the response tends to be more predictable in the midtones, one good way to expose images in the first place is to adjust the exposure so that something you have decided is of average brightness (e.g. an 18% grey card) ends up in the middle of the tonal scale where you've decided it should be (theoretically 117, but 115 or 120 or even 128 work too). Exposing so a grey card ends up in the middle of the code value range, or the middle of the film density range as measured by a densitometer, is very common. In the electronic world, it's sometimes more convenient to expose so that the brightest thing in the scene that you want to preserve information from ends up near, but not beyond, 255. You can do this approximately using any digital camera that has a histogram display. Some cameras also flash or put zebra stripes in areas that were overexposed in the preview image, which gives better visualization of what will be recorded correctly and what will be clipped. Dave |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
How to understand 18% gray?
if you look at a photographic grayscale of 11 steps, the centre mid-gray
(the sixth step) is indicated as 0.7. this is sensitometric density value, a log value of opacity. opacity = 100% of illumination upon X% reflected or transmitted light. if X=18%, then opacity = 100/18=5.5 therefore sensitometric density = log5.5 = 0.74...-round off to 0.7. hence 18% reflection gray is 0.7 sensitometric density value and is the mid-gray between the white and black of a grayscale. "Steven Woody" wrote in message ... why 18% gray is in the mid of the full scale of brightness from darkest to brightest? what's the math behind it? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finally, art I can understand. | Kinon O'Cann | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | July 10th 07 05:00 PM |
Finally, art I can understand. | Kinon O'Cann | Digital Photography | 2 | July 10th 07 01:35 AM |
Canon--Trying to Understand | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 17 | June 14th 07 07:06 PM |
What Don't I understand? | Bob Hatch | Digital Photography | 2 | July 7th 04 06:01 PM |
I've Gotta Gripe somewhere-Hopefully you'll understand!! | one_of_many | Large Format Photography Equipment | 4 | June 24th 04 05:59 AM |