MR. ED LOVES THE TOTALLY INFRARED D60!

I was touched and truly honored, but then you brought Rita into it. :-(

My, god, man, get a little closer to the horse; it's not going to bite,
gently. :-)

Have you been happy with the AF across the range of the 28-135 or are these
manually focused and then IR adjusted?
-Jim

"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
This one is for you, Jim Kramer....

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/101056640/original

Oh, and you too, Rita.

"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
On Aug 2, 9:20 am, "jimkramer"
wrote:
I was touched and truly honored, but then you brought Rita into it. :-(

My, god, man, get a little closer to the horse; it's not going to bite,
gently. :-)

But then I'd have to get out of the car.

Well, laziness is it's own reward. :-)


Have you been happy with the AF across the range of the 28-135 or are
these
manually focused and then IR adjusted?

I just let it auto-focus. Supposedly, my infrared cammy was
calibrated for the 50 f/1.8, but I haven't noticed too many probs with
the other lenses. Perhaps a tad softer.

I had mine done for the 50,1.8 too. I've had good luck with the 20,2.8 and
the 50,1.4 (well shaded as it has a very bad hot spot), mixed results with
the Sigma 15,2.8 and the Canon 28-135, but anything longer has just been
awful for AF and guestimating focus is hit and miss even with digital.
:-( I don't even want to talk about the experiences with the 100,2.8 macro
-Jim

jimkramer wrote:
"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
On Aug 2, 9:20 am, "jimkramer"
wrote:
I was touched and truly honored, but then you brought Rita into it. :-(

My, god, man, get a little closer to the horse; it's not going to bite,
gently. :-)

But then I'd have to get out of the car.

Well, laziness is it's own reward. :-)

Have you been happy with the AF across the range of the 28-135 or are
these
manually focused and then IR adjusted?

I just let it auto-focus. Supposedly, my infrared cammy was
calibrated for the 50 f/1.8, but I haven't noticed too many probs with
the other lenses. Perhaps a tad softer.

I had mine done for the 50,1.8 too. I've had good luck with the 20,2.8 and
the 50,1.4 (well shaded as it has a very bad hot spot), mixed results with
the Sigma 15,2.8 and the Canon 28-135, but anything longer has just been
awful for AF and guestimating focus is hit and miss even with digital.
:-( I don't even want to talk about the experiences with the 100,2.8 macro
-Jim





Has Aussie Mark Thomas left and given you the smileys, Jim?

--

visit www.D-Mac.info
to relieve the tension...
Usenet is after all Usenet!