If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
People say it is not a good idea to purchase the smaller sensor lenses
for Nikon and Canon since they would be ineffective if you want to upgrade to a full frame 5D or if Nikon brings out a full frame DSLR. Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Is there any advantage to purchasing smaller sensor lenses? What are the designations for both Canon and Nikon for the full frame and small sensor lenses? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
measekite wrote:
People say it is not a good idea to purchase the smaller sensor lenses for Nikon and Canon since they would be ineffective if you want to upgrade to a full frame 5D or if Nikon brings out a full frame DSLR. That's true and it is a consideration. But some people believe that the current sensor size will be around for a long time. 35 mm cameras did not disappear because of large format cameras. Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Heavier, more expensive, plus see next answer. Is there any advantage to purchasing smaller sensor lenses? Lighter, less expensive. Also, some manufacturers claim they have optimized the lenses for use with the shiny sensor in digital cameras. What are the designations for both Canon and Nikon for the full frame and small sensor lenses? For Nikon it's DX for the small sensor lenses; any lens without the DX designation is for full frame. .. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses?
Yup. Quite often the range of full frame zoom lenses aren't suited to cropped sensors. For example, a zoom starting at 24-105mm lens would have an excellent range for full frame, but not very wide on a cropped sensor. Also, with the Canon range, the better quality 'L' lenses are really tailored towards full frame. So getting a 'L' zoom for a cropped sensor body usually results in a non ideal range. A 16-35 L isn't really that wide on a cropped body, so to get a super wide angle lens, you would need to go for a 10-22 non 'L' lens. Is there any advantage to purchasing smaller sensor lenses? Pretty much the opposite to above. What are the designations for both Canon and Nikon for the full frame and small sensor lenses? Canon full frame lenses are EF, Canon cropped sensor body lenses are EF-S. Although the full frame EF lenses will fit on the cropped sensor bodies without any problems. "measekite" wrote in message . .. People say it is not a good idea to purchase the smaller sensor lenses for Nikon and Canon since they would be ineffective if you want to upgrade to a full frame 5D or if Nikon brings out a full frame DSLR. Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Is there any advantage to purchasing smaller sensor lenses? What are the designations for both Canon and Nikon for the full frame and small sensor lenses? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
Shaun wrote:
Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Yup. Quite often the range of full frame zoom lenses aren't suited to cropped sensors. For example, a zoom starting at 24-105mm lens would have an excellent range for full frame, but not very wide on a cropped sensor. Also, with the Canon range, the better quality 'L' lenses are really tailored towards full frame. So getting a 'L' zoom for a cropped sensor body usually results in a non ideal range. A 16-35 L isn't really that wide on a cropped body, so to get a super wide angle lens, you would need to go for a 10-22 non 'L' lens. That's not true. absolutely. Cropped image is what it is. cropped. most of the lenses inacuracies exist in the outer fringes of its image. Very often a mediocre full frame lense will be just perfect for a small sensor because it will not show its outer area. In addition, a 10-22 lense is still 10-22 equivalent. it's about 16-30 on the camera. an EF-S lens doenst mean its numbers are as of 35mm, they dont do this conversion for you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
What part isn't true?
wrote in message ps.com... Shaun wrote: Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Yup. Quite often the range of full frame zoom lenses aren't suited to cropped sensors. For example, a zoom starting at 24-105mm lens would have an excellent range for full frame, but not very wide on a cropped sensor. Also, with the Canon range, the better quality 'L' lenses are really tailored towards full frame. So getting a 'L' zoom for a cropped sensor body usually results in a non ideal range. A 16-35 L isn't really that wide on a cropped body, so to get a super wide angle lens, you would need to go for a 10-22 non 'L' lens. That's not true. absolutely. Cropped image is what it is. cropped. most of the lenses inacuracies exist in the outer fringes of its image. Very often a mediocre full frame lense will be just perfect for a small sensor because it will not show its outer area. In addition, a 10-22 lense is still 10-22 equivalent. it's about 16-30 on the camera. an EF-S lens doenst mean its numbers are as of 35mm, they dont do this conversion for you. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
pixel_a_ted wrote:
measekite wrote: People say it is not a good idea to purchase the smaller sensor lenses for Nikon and Canon since they would be ineffective if you want to upgrade to a full frame 5D or if Nikon brings out a full frame DSLR. That's true and it is a consideration. But some people believe that the current sensor size will be around for a long time. 35 mm cameras did not disappear because of large format cameras. In the interest of historical accuracy, 35mm cameras appeared after large format cameras, which, while they didn't disappear did shrink a little. Dave Cohen Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Heavier, more expensive, plus see next answer. Is there any advantage to purchasing smaller sensor lenses? Lighter, less expensive. Also, some manufacturers claim they have optimized the lenses for use with the shiny sensor in digital cameras. What are the designations for both Canon and Nikon for the full frame and small sensor lenses? For Nikon it's DX for the small sensor lenses; any lens without the DX designation is for full frame. . |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
In article om,
" writes Shaun wrote: Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Yup. Quite often the range of full frame zoom lenses aren't suited to cropped sensors. For example, a zoom starting at 24-105mm lens would have an excellent range for full frame, but not very wide on a cropped sensor. Also, with the Canon range, the better quality 'L' lenses are really tailored towards full frame. So getting a 'L' zoom for a cropped sensor body usually results in a non ideal range. A 16-35 L isn't really that wide on a cropped body, so to get a super wide angle lens, you would need to go for a 10-22 non 'L' lens. That's not true. absolutely. Cropped image is what it is. cropped. most of the lenses inacuracies exist in the outer fringes of its image. Very often a mediocre full frame lense will be just perfect for a small sensor because it will not show its outer area. In addition, a 10-22 lense is still 10-22 equivalent. it's about 16-30 on the camera. an EF-S lens doenst mean its numbers are as of 35mm, they dont do this conversion for you. That is not what he is saying, he is saying that a 16 mm lens is not very wide on a cropped body because it will only have the angle of view a 26 mm lens gives on a full-frame body, if you want the view that a 16 mm lens gave you on 35 mm film you will need a 10 mm lens for your (1.6) cropped sensor. And a 24 mm lens only gives the angle of view that a 38 mm lens has. -- Ian G8ILZ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
Shaun wrote:
What part isn't true? The part about top posting. -- lsmft |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
pixel_a_ted wrote: measekite wrote: People say it is not a good idea to purchase the smaller sensor lenses for Nikon and Canon since they would be ineffective if you want to upgrade to a full frame 5D or if Nikon brings out a full frame DSLR. That's true and it is a consideration. But some people believe that the current sensor size will be around for a long time. 35 mm cameras did not disappear because of large format cameras. I understand but if you look at the past few years DSLR camera are becomming a better value. More for the same or less money. Look at the $7000 full frame Canon and now you can get the little brother 5D for around $3000. Going on then in the not too distant future you may be able to get maybe a 4D for around $1500. If that is the case then people who bought the APS size lenses would be at a disadvantage if they wanted to upgrade. It seems that to get the benefits of DX or EF-S lenses one is taking a chance that they will not be able to upgrade. Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Heavier, more expensive, plus see next answer. Is there any advantage to purchasing smaller sensor lenses? Lighter, less expensive. Also, some manufacturers claim they have optimized the lenses for use with the shiny sensor in digital cameras. What are the designations for both Canon and Nikon for the full frame and small sensor lenses? For Nikon it's DX for the small sensor lenses; any lens without the DX designation is for full frame. . |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Full Frame Lenses vs Small Sensor Lenses
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:17:13 +0100, "Shaun" wrote:
What part isn't true? The part about the L lenses. wrote in message ups.com... Shaun wrote: Is there any disadvantage to purchasing only full frame lenses? Yup. Quite often the range of full frame zoom lenses aren't suited to cropped sensors. For example, a zoom starting at 24-105mm lens would have an excellent range for full frame, but not very wide on a cropped sensor. Also, with the Canon range, the better quality 'L' lenses are really tailored towards full frame. So getting a 'L' zoom for a cropped sensor body usually results in a non ideal range. A 16-35 L isn't really that wide on a cropped body, so to get a super wide angle lens, you would need to go for a 10-22 non 'L' lens. That's not true. absolutely. Cropped image is what it is. cropped. most of the lenses inacuracies exist in the outer fringes of its image. Very often a mediocre full frame lense will be just perfect for a small sensor because it will not show its outer area. In addition, a 10-22 lense is still 10-22 equivalent. it's about 16-30 on the camera. an EF-S lens doenst mean its numbers are as of 35mm, they dont do this conversion for you. -- Bill Funk replace "g" with "a" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Full frame lenses resolution on smaller sensor question. | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | January 15th 06 08:32 PM |
Analogue Lenses on Digital Body | CJB | Digital Photography | 76 | December 25th 05 09:22 AM |
Less than stellar, dPreviews EOS-5D test... | ThomasH | 35mm Photo Equipment | 68 | November 21st 05 05:57 AM |
4/3 vs 1.x crop vs full frame lens | UrbanVoyeur | Digital SLR Cameras | 71 | April 20th 05 09:48 AM |
FS: 8 Nikon lenses including 80-200 Nikkor 2.8 zoom and accessories | Henry Peña | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | November 11th 03 06:20 PM |