If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:43:28 -0700, S. S. wrote:
Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... I am trying to decide whether to go with a Nikon F4 / F5 or an MF Nikon prior to F4. What lenses are you looking to use? If you buy an F4 you will be able to make use of pretty much any Nikon lenses, including pre-AI manual focus, G type and AF-S. With AF-S lenses the F4 becomes a very good AF body (not so hot with ordinary AF lenses). The F5 OTOH, is only able to use pre-AI lenses with a Nikon modification to the mount. Otherwise it is probably the most adaptable Nikon body around. Of course it will cost a lot more than an F4. -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded" - Sixto Rodriguez |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:17:37 +0000, Tony wrote:
Actually the MF will be the heavier given similar models. They tend to be old designs with mechanical linkages and metal bodies. The only advantage to them is that some equipment snobs will tell you that you'll learn more about photography from them - they are wrong, and in fact actually don't have the vaguest idea how wrong they are, but that's the way they are, and no amount of evidence is gonna change them. Go for AF - and take a look at Canon and Pentax while you're at it. Nikon has been running on empty for a while now. So the rest of the world is wrong and Mr Spadaro is right. What an idiot. What a complete and utter idiot you have become. What a complete and utterly prejudiced idiot you have become. Has something been eating at your grey matter that you could bring yourself to make such inane comments? You are the Godfather of brand prejudice and as such, who can take anything you say seriously anymore? Are you still ****ed off about your Nikon scanner that broke and had to be repaired? -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded" - Sixto Rodriguez |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:43:28 -0700, S. S. wrote:
Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... I am trying to decide whether to go with a Nikon F4 / F5 or an MF Nikon prior to F4. What lenses are you looking to use? If you buy an F4 you will be able to make use of pretty much any Nikon lenses, including pre-AI manual focus, G type and AF-S. With AF-S lenses the F4 becomes a very good AF body (not so hot with ordinary AF lenses). The F5 OTOH, is only able to use pre-AI lenses with a Nikon modification to the mount. Otherwise it is probably the most adaptable Nikon body around. Of course it will cost a lot more than an F4. -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded" - Sixto Rodriguez |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"S. S." wrote:
If you have bad eyesight, then you would probably do worse with manual focusing. Thank you very much for the answer! I do wear a pair of prescription glasses. Do you know whether wearing glasses has any impact on manual focus in particular and handling 35mm (versus digital where you do not need to look into viewfinder) in general? Thank you once again! In general, you would want a better screen that allowed easier focusing manually. There are a few options to consider, such as high eyepoint finders. The smaller manual focus bodies are not so good for that, though the F3HP, and the F4 are well suited to manual focusing for eyeglasses wearers. The other option is to not wear your eyeglasses, and use a diopter lens on the finder. Any optics place could make one, or if your eyesight is correctable in whole number increments, there are many Nikon made diopters for most of the manual focus bodies. Some people prefer to keep their glasses on while shooting, while others like the diopter choice. My personal preference is to wear contact lenses, and use a 0 diopter on my cameras. I should mention that my eyesight without contact lenses is actually fairly good, and I have a very weak strength prescription. I guess since you asked about Nikon, I should mention that I use a Nikon FE for most of my 35 mm work. While the eyepoint of the FE is not as good as for the F3 or F4, it is a much smaller and more compact camera body. I think the idea of digital, using just the LCD (like on a P&S), leads to other problems. There is no way to hold a camera steady at bent arms distance. Also, judging focus is questionable on an LCD, and I would hesitate to recommend manually focusing using one like that. Prices on the F4 are actually fairly low currently, with many good used examples. Check the prices at KEH in Atlanta first http://www.keh.com, since sometimes EBAY auctions go too high on prices. The F4 would also allow autofocus lenses to be used, though only with a centre focus area selection. The F3 is slightly smaller and lighter, and just a little less expensive than an F4. Avoid the F3AF, since that early autofocus camera has some weird lenses, and is not very ergonomic. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com/gallery.html Updated! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"S. S." wrote:
If you have bad eyesight, then you would probably do worse with manual focusing. Thank you very much for the answer! I do wear a pair of prescription glasses. Do you know whether wearing glasses has any impact on manual focus in particular and handling 35mm (versus digital where you do not need to look into viewfinder) in general? Thank you once again! In general, you would want a better screen that allowed easier focusing manually. There are a few options to consider, such as high eyepoint finders. The smaller manual focus bodies are not so good for that, though the F3HP, and the F4 are well suited to manual focusing for eyeglasses wearers. The other option is to not wear your eyeglasses, and use a diopter lens on the finder. Any optics place could make one, or if your eyesight is correctable in whole number increments, there are many Nikon made diopters for most of the manual focus bodies. Some people prefer to keep their glasses on while shooting, while others like the diopter choice. My personal preference is to wear contact lenses, and use a 0 diopter on my cameras. I should mention that my eyesight without contact lenses is actually fairly good, and I have a very weak strength prescription. I guess since you asked about Nikon, I should mention that I use a Nikon FE for most of my 35 mm work. While the eyepoint of the FE is not as good as for the F3 or F4, it is a much smaller and more compact camera body. I think the idea of digital, using just the LCD (like on a P&S), leads to other problems. There is no way to hold a camera steady at bent arms distance. Also, judging focus is questionable on an LCD, and I would hesitate to recommend manually focusing using one like that. Prices on the F4 are actually fairly low currently, with many good used examples. Check the prices at KEH in Atlanta first http://www.keh.com, since sometimes EBAY auctions go too high on prices. The F4 would also allow autofocus lenses to be used, though only with a centre focus area selection. The F3 is slightly smaller and lighter, and just a little less expensive than an F4. Avoid the F3AF, since that early autofocus camera has some weird lenses, and is not very ergonomic. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com/gallery.html Updated! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"S. S." wrote:
If you have bad eyesight, then you would probably do worse with manual focusing. Thank you very much for the answer! I do wear a pair of prescription glasses. Do you know whether wearing glasses has any impact on manual focus in particular and handling 35mm (versus digital where you do not need to look into viewfinder) in general? Thank you once again! In general, you would want a better screen that allowed easier focusing manually. There are a few options to consider, such as high eyepoint finders. The smaller manual focus bodies are not so good for that, though the F3HP, and the F4 are well suited to manual focusing for eyeglasses wearers. The other option is to not wear your eyeglasses, and use a diopter lens on the finder. Any optics place could make one, or if your eyesight is correctable in whole number increments, there are many Nikon made diopters for most of the manual focus bodies. Some people prefer to keep their glasses on while shooting, while others like the diopter choice. My personal preference is to wear contact lenses, and use a 0 diopter on my cameras. I should mention that my eyesight without contact lenses is actually fairly good, and I have a very weak strength prescription. I guess since you asked about Nikon, I should mention that I use a Nikon FE for most of my 35 mm work. While the eyepoint of the FE is not as good as for the F3 or F4, it is a much smaller and more compact camera body. I think the idea of digital, using just the LCD (like on a P&S), leads to other problems. There is no way to hold a camera steady at bent arms distance. Also, judging focus is questionable on an LCD, and I would hesitate to recommend manually focusing using one like that. Prices on the F4 are actually fairly low currently, with many good used examples. Check the prices at KEH in Atlanta first http://www.keh.com, since sometimes EBAY auctions go too high on prices. The F4 would also allow autofocus lenses to be used, though only with a centre focus area selection. The F3 is slightly smaller and lighter, and just a little less expensive than an F4. Avoid the F3AF, since that early autofocus camera has some weird lenses, and is not very ergonomic. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com/gallery.html Updated! |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"S. S." wrote in message om... Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... I am trying to decide whether to go with a Nikon F4 / F5 or an MF Nikon prior to F4. Both are very good camera bodies. The F5 will cost considerably more than the F4 but that's to be expected. I have both cameras and it suites me to use the F4 much more often than I use the F5. Although both bodies are top-o-the-line, each has advantages in how they are used. Since Dallas has already mentioned the lenses, I won't repeat what he said. IMO, you will not go wrong with either camera body but you should be aware that some parts for the F4 may not be readily available, if repairs are needed. But accessories for the F4 are readily available and inexpensive. An F4e with a MF23 back is a potent tool photographic tool and IMO, more user friendly than the F5. nick |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"S. S." wrote in message om... Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... I am trying to decide whether to go with a Nikon F4 / F5 or an MF Nikon prior to F4. Both are very good camera bodies. The F5 will cost considerably more than the F4 but that's to be expected. I have both cameras and it suites me to use the F4 much more often than I use the F5. Although both bodies are top-o-the-line, each has advantages in how they are used. Since Dallas has already mentioned the lenses, I won't repeat what he said. IMO, you will not go wrong with either camera body but you should be aware that some parts for the F4 may not be readily available, if repairs are needed. But accessories for the F4 are readily available and inexpensive. An F4e with a MF23 back is a potent tool photographic tool and IMO, more user friendly than the F5. nick |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:43:28 -0700, S. S. wrote: Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... I am trying to decide whether to go with a Nikon F4 / F5 or an MF Nikon prior to F4. What lenses are you looking to use? If you buy an F4 you will be able to make use of pretty much any Nikon lenses, including pre-AI manual focus, G type and AF-S. With AF-S lenses the F4 becomes a very good AF body (not so hot with ordinary AF lenses). As I uderstand it, the F4 has no idea what to do with an AFS lense. Indeed, it is less "hot" on account of AF not working at all :-) Also, G type lenses will only work in the Program modes; so no A,S, or M. Cheers, Proud F4s owner. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:43:28 -0700, S. S. wrote: Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... I am trying to decide whether to go with a Nikon F4 / F5 or an MF Nikon prior to F4. What lenses are you looking to use? If you buy an F4 you will be able to make use of pretty much any Nikon lenses, including pre-AI manual focus, G type and AF-S. With AF-S lenses the F4 becomes a very good AF body (not so hot with ordinary AF lenses). As I uderstand it, the F4 has no idea what to do with an AFS lense. Indeed, it is less "hot" on account of AF not working at all :-) Also, G type lenses will only work in the Program modes; so no A,S, or M. Cheers, Proud F4s owner. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need Nikon FG Instruction Manual | Amit Joneja | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | August 6th 04 01:39 PM |
Nikon D70 (and my 35mm Nikon equipment) | Matt Clara | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | July 2nd 04 11:58 AM |
What's the "leica look"? | TP | 35mm Photo Equipment | 68 | June 24th 04 05:05 PM |
Nikon SF-200 Auto slide feeder (like new) for sale | Ronald Shu | Photographing Nature | 0 | January 31st 04 07:46 PM |
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner | bleanne | APS Photographic Equipment | 1 | November 27th 03 07:34 AM |