cloudy this morning

On 12/27/2013 4:33 AM, RichA wrote:


Very nice shot, I don't see any real issues with it. Had I tried to shoot that today, the bee would have been under 1/2 inch of ice! Lucky to be in a warmer clime.

Thanks. I do not live in the warmer climes.

somehow, through snipping, or my idiocy, that bee, which was intended to
be in a macro reply, would up in a different location.
the bee was shot on Long Island.
I suspect who the inaccurate snipper was, but.......

--
PeterN

On 2013-12-27 12:32:09 +0000, PeterN said:

On 12/26/2013 8:38 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-12-27 00:55:27 +0000, PeterN said:

On 12/26/2013 8:03 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-12-26 08:38:12 +0000, Eric Stevens
said:

On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 20:20:07 -0800, Savageduck
wrote:

Le Snip


Just for fun I only used the "Camera RAW Filter" and the selective
adjustment brush to paint the underside of the wings. Then adjusted
the
shadows, contrast, clarity, and a touch more sharpness.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/Fil...enshot_487.jpg
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O1.jpg

That one seems a little bit overdone to my eyes.

Just toying about with the jpeg, to illustrate a tool. As you know,
there is a big difference between having a very compressed jpeg or a 24
MB NEF to work on. That was the reason to show the ACR mask shot.


I know.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20131225_sanibel%20birds_1625.NEF


That

was

lost in the 404 error of the internet.



I checked the link, it sseems to be correct. Try again.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20131225_sanibel%20birds_1625.NEF

That

time it worked.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2013-12-27 13:14:21 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2013-12-27 12:32:09 +0000, PeterN said:

Le Snip

I checked the link, it sseems to be correct. Try again.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20131225_sanibel%20birds_1625.NEF

That

time it worked.

That was much better, and easier to work on. Here is version #1:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O1Acc.jpg

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 12/27/2013 8:43 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-12-27 13:14:21 +0000, Savageduck
said:

On 2013-12-27 12:32:09 +0000, PeterN said:

Le Snip

I checked the link, it sseems to be correct. Try again.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20131225_sanibel%20birds_1625.NEF


That

time it worked.

That was much better, and easier to work on. Here is version #1:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O1Acc.jpg


So far i like the M-M version.

--
PeterN

In article , PeterN
wrote:


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...0birds_1625.NE
F

Here's a cool version of the NEF file with that mouse-over thing. The
clouds are really there- just brought out in levels:

http://mhmyers.home.comcast.net/webdir/osp2/osp2.html

--
m-m
photo gallery:
http://mhmyers.com

On 12/27/2013 2:15 PM, M-M wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...0birds_1625.NE
F

Here's a cool version of the NEF file with that mouse-over thing. The
clouds are really there- just brought out in levels:

http://mhmyers.home.comcast.net/webdir/osp2/osp2.html


Neat. Just for the record, I am traveling and using my laptop. Since it
has a 14" screen, which I do not color correct, I use it only for keeper
& possibility decisions.

BTW how do you do the mouse-over thing?

--
PeterN

In article , PeterN
wrote:


Here's a cool version of the NEF file with that mouse-over thing. The
clouds are really there- just brought out in levels:

http://mhmyers.home.comcast.net/webdir/osp2/osp2.html


Neat. Just for the record, I am traveling and using my laptop. Since it
has a 14" screen, which I do not color correct, I use it only for keeper
& possibility decisions.

BTW how do you do the mouse-over thing?

javascript.

view the page source and you can see exactly what it does.

On 2013-12-27 15:25:03 +0000, PeterN said:

On 12/27/2013 8:43 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-12-27 13:14:21 +0000, Savageduck
said:

On 2013-12-27 12:32:09 +0000, PeterN said:

Le Snip

I checked the link, it sseems to be correct. Try again.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20131225_sanibel%20birds_1625.NEF


That

time

it worked.

That was much better, and easier to work on. Here is version #1:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O1Acc.jpg


So far i like the M-M version.

The beauty of having the NEF to work with, gives one a whole bunch of
options. Here is my NEF version #2, which is very different from the
other results.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O2Ac.jpg

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2013-12-27 19:53:56 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2013-12-27 15:25:03 +0000, PeterN said:

On 12/27/2013 8:43 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-12-27 13:14:21 +0000, Savageduck
said:

On 2013-12-27 12:32:09 +0000, PeterN said:

Le Snip

I checked the link, it sseems to be correct. Try again.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/20131225_sanibel%20birds_1625.NEF


That

time

it

worked.

That was much better, and easier to work on. Here is version #1:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O1Acc.jpg


So far i like the M-M version.

The beauty of having the NEF to work with, gives one a whole bunch of
options. Here is my NEF version #2, which is very different from the
other results.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O2Ac.jpg

....and a toned down NEF version #3:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/PN-O3Ac.jpg

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:31:37 -0500, PeterN
wrote:

Neat. Just for the record, I am traveling and using my laptop. Since it
has a 14" screen, which I do not color correct, I use it only for keeper
& possibility decisions.


Question, out of every possibility posited so far, which is the
closest to your personal perception at the moment?