If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
"Sammy" wrote in message ... On 12 Jun 2007, Yoshi wrote: You are clueless. There are no "Nikkormat lenses" At the time the Nikkormats were produced, Nikon marketed Nikkor lenses for them. The Series E lenses marketed as "Nikon" weren't rebranded, and were made to sell with the EM and FG series cameras. Don't spread misinformation. If you don't know what you are talking about, STFU. "Sammy" wrote in message ... Many years ago we saw Nikon rebrand Nikkormat lenses as Nikkor. It diluted some of the brand value of Nikon but in the end all was ok. Now some Panasonic subcompact digital cameras have Leica lenses. (I've only just noticed but maybe they have done it for a long time.) http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/l..._10/leica.html http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/l..._10/index.html I can't think Leitz would want to have its name on something which was very average. Is this baby a Leica lens generally better than the lenses on similar cameras? You are clueless. There are no "Nikkormat lenses" At the time the Nikkormats were produced, Nikon marketed Nikkor lenses for them. The Series E lenses marketed as "Nikon" weren't rebranded, and were made to sell with the EM and FG series cameras. Don't spread misinformation. If you don't know what you are talking about, STFU. Yoshi "Nikkormat lenses" can mean lenses which are for a Nikkormat. Is English your first language? You apparently didn't even read the original post... or else you are the one who English comprehension is impaired. The OP specifically mentions rebranding Nikkormat lenses as Nikkor. This precludes your interpretation. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
"=(8)" wrote in message ... "Sammy" wrote in message ... Many years ago we saw Nikon rebrand Nikkormat lenses as Nikkor. It diluted some of the brand value of Nikon but in the end all was ok. Now some Panasonic subcompact digital cameras have Leica lenses. (I've only just noticed but maybe they have done it for a long time.) http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/l..._10/leica.html http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/l..._10/index.html I can't think Leitz would want to have its name on something which was very average. Is this baby a Leica lens generally better than the lenses on similar cameras? Leica sets the specifications that Panasonic must follow in order to claim it is a Leica lens. However, Leica does not make the lens Panasonic does. Having owned both a FZ20 and I still own an FZ30 the lenses are very impressive. The same is true for the FZ50, however for it the higher resolution, small sensor and totally crappy noise reduction makes that camera total junk. However, the Leica lenses are fantastic. =(8) Question: I also own the FZ30, but was thinking about getting the FZ50. Based upon your comments regarding the FZ50, I guess you are saying the FZ30 is a better camera overall. Is that correct? Thanks, Robert A. Cunningham |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
On Jun 13, 6:17 pm, "Stan Beck"
wrote: You are paying $3000 for the red dot, not the camera. It's not how much something is worth, but rather how much you can get for it. -- True, you do pay a premium. Which is why the Leica Digilux 3 (Panasonic L1) costs 50% more than the L1. But, Leica boosters will tell you...it's got different internal software.... |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
On Jun 13, 6:44 pm, "Robert A. Cunningham"
wrote: "=(8)" wrote in message ... "Sammy" wrote in message ... Many years ago we saw Nikon rebrand Nikkormat lenses as Nikkor. It diluted some of the brand value of Nikon but in the end all was ok. Now some Panasonic subcompact digital cameras have Leica lenses. (I've only just noticed but maybe they have done it for a long time.) http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/l..._10/leica.html http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/l..._10/index.html I can't think Leitz would want to have its name on something which was very average. Is this baby a Leica lens generally better than the lenses on similar cameras? Leica sets the specifications that Panasonic must follow in order to claim it is a Leica lens. However, Leica does not make the lens Panasonic does. Having owned both a FZ20 and I still own an FZ30 the lenses are very impressive. The same is true for the FZ50, however for it the higher resolution, small sensor and totally crappy noise reduction makes that camera total junk. However, the Leica lenses are fantastic. =(8) Question: I also own the FZ30, but was thinking about getting the FZ50. Big mistake. The FZ50 is where Panasonic caved in to the masses and ladelled on the NR in-camera. Result? A 10 meg camera with LESS resolution than the old 8 meg!! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
On 2007-06-13, Rich wrote:
made 50mm lens for around $3,000. Do you honestly think anything remotely related to that kind of engineering and production ends up in a Chinese made Panasonic? Sure. China is not Germany and nobody claimed to be selling $3k 50mm German Leica lenses of Chinese manufacture. What? Leica can't produce a low end line and sub it out like everyone else? nb |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
On Jun 13, 7:58 pm, notbob wrote:
On 2007-06-13, Rich wrote: made 50mm lens for around $3,000. Do you honestly think anything remotely related to that kind of engineering and production ends up in a Chinese made Panasonic? Sure. China is not Germany and nobody claimed to be selling $3k 50mm German Leica lenses of Chinese manufacture. What? Leica can't produce a low end line and sub it out like everyone else? nb Sure they can, and they have. But lets not toss around the Leica name as if their participation amounted to anything more than a badge. Personally, I would like to see Leica put resources into a good P&S long zoom lens, just to see what they could come up with, but would anyone pay the $5000 the resultant camera would cost? And why would ANYONE pay that for another P&S POS with a 1/2.5" sensor, unless they were brain-dead? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
"Garrot" wrote in message
... On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:07:07 -0700, Rich wrote: Panasonic has said that they build the lenses but have to mean Leica's standards to use their name. Makes sense Leica wouldn't want their name tarnished with crap lenses. They leave that to Kodak. =(8) Sure. Kodak, who uses the Schneider lens name on THEIR cameras. It is all big con. Yea, all other lenses besides Leica are crap. I'm pretty certain now that our little friend is a Panasonic employee who has come here to do damage control by trying to sell us his bull****. Until you can show a statement from Kodak or anyone else using a well respected name that in order for them to put that name on their products that the lenses have to meet or exceed their quality specifications then they are questionable. Panasonic and Leica have both stated that in order for Panasonic to use the Leica name the lenses have to meet Leica specifications. That is proof. Kodak and others have never made such a statement. So for all we know they bought the company for the name and just put it on any old thing. Add to that that for a very long time Kodak used plastic lenses in their cameras that also adds doubts. I want proof and a statement saying they have to meet specifications before they can use the name is that proof. =(8) |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
"Rich" wrote in message
oups.com... On Jun 13, 12:12 am, "=\(8\)" wrote: "Rich" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 12, 1:38 pm, Sammy wrote: Many years ago we saw Nikon rebrand Nikkormat lenses as Nikkor. It diluted some of the brand value of Nikon but in the end all was ok. Now some Panasonic subcompact digital cameras have Leica lenses. (I've only just noticed but maybe they have done it for a long time.) http://panasonic.co.jp/pavc/global/l...htmlhttp://pan... I can't think Leitz would want to have its name on something which was very average. Is this baby a Leica lens generally better than the lenses on similar cameras? Those Leica lenses are as "Leica" as the lens in an old Kodak. The biggest con in cheap cameras is namedropping German lens design companies, that have next to ZERO to do with the lens their name is stamped on. You are so full of it Rich. I submit that any company that allows there names to be slapped on another's products and has no say in the quality of the products or the quality of the technology said company is responsible for is not a company that makes a good product. Leica is simply not going to let Panasonic of anyone else simply slap their name on a product unless it meets or exceeds their quality and design requirements. Sure, which is why we see the same chromatic aberration from their P&S camera lenses(Panasonics) as everyone else's. Leica with Panasonic, Schneider on Kodaks, Zeiss on Sony's. It's the use of names for names sake, and has nothing to do with the actual quality or design of the lenses on those cheap cameras. Chromatic aberration means nothing. All lenses are capable of that given the right circumstances. To use that as your proof just makes you more an ass and a dumb one too boot! =(8) |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
"Rich" wrote in message
ups.com... On Jun 13, 2:43 pm, notbob wrote: On 2007-06-13, Rich wrote: Schneider on Kodaks, Zeiss on Sony's. It's the use of names for names sake, and has nothing to do with the actual quality or design of the lenses on those cheap cameras. ...and of course you have irrefutable proof of all these accusations and are going to share them with us, right? nb The proof is in the results you see. Leica sells a real West German made 50mm lens for around $3,000. Do you honestly think anything remotely related to that kind of engineering and production ends up in a Chinese made Panasonic? Panasonic nor Leica ever claimed that they did. What both companies have claimed is that in order for Panasonic to put the Leica name on their cameras they lenses have to meet Leica's specifications. If you think that lenses makers only have one grade of lens then once again that makes your a dumb ass. =(8) |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Leica lens on Panasonic subcompact - any good?
"Rich" wrote in message
ups.com... On Jun 13, 7:58 pm, notbob wrote: On 2007-06-13, Rich wrote: made 50mm lens for around $3,000. Do you honestly think anything remotely related to that kind of engineering and production ends up in a Chinese made Panasonic? Sure. China is not Germany and nobody claimed to be selling $3k 50mm German Leica lenses of Chinese manufacture. What? Leica can't produce a low end line and sub it out like everyone else? nb Sure they can, and they have. But lets not toss around the Leica name as if their participation amounted to anything more than a badge. Personally, I would like to see Leica put resources into a good P&S long zoom lens, just to see what they could come up with, but would anyone pay the $5000 the resultant camera would cost? And why would ANYONE pay that for another P&S POS with a 1/2.5" sensor, unless they were brain-dead? Once again you miss the whole point of this discussion. We are talking about how Panasonic is able to use the Leica name and they are able to do so by meeting the lens specifications laid out by Leica. Show me that Kodak or anyone else using one of the older highly regarded lenses names has to do this. You can't as Kodak has never said to use the name they do that they have to meet a specification set out by the lens people. Sony is the same way, never a statement. So for all we know Kodak and Sony bought the names and are just wily nilly stamping them on anything they want hoping to sucker people in. I want to see a public statement that says they aren't doing this. And, if you think they wouldn't do this think about Sony's recent purchase of Minolta. That is how they got the dSLR camera technology so them buying another company for a name they feel will bring in money or licensing the name with no quality strings involved doesn't seem that far fetched. If this isn't the case then they need to make a public statement indicating that just like Leica and Panasonic have done. =(8) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leica D Vario Elmarit 14-50 lens not as good as Olympus 14-54 pro lens. | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | October 6th 06 08:40 AM |
Panasonic Lumix digital 35-420mm Leica lens | Miriam Agron | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | October 20th 04 12:23 AM |
FA: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1 Digital camera with Leica 12X optical zoom lens | Marvin Culpepper | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | October 15th 04 01:05 AM |
FA: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1 Digital camera with Leica 12X optical zoom lens | Marvin Culpepper | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | October 15th 04 01:05 AM |
FA: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1 Digital camera with Leica 12X optical zoom lens | Marvin Culpepper | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | October 15th 04 01:05 AM |