If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
I am looking for a new high end digital camera. I was looking at the Sony
F828 but someone told me to pay that little bit extra & go for the Eos300D SLR. Is there a big difference between these apart from one being SLR & which would i really be better off buying as i can't help feeling that i will end up getting the wrong one so all posotive advice would be welcome please. Thanks Phil. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"Philip" wrote in message ... I am looking for a new high end digital camera. I was looking at the Sony F828 but someone told me to pay that little bit extra & go for the Eos300D SLR. Is there a big difference between these apart from one being SLR & which would i really be better off buying as i can't help feeling that i will end up getting the wrong one so all posotive advice would be welcome please. Go to a camera store and handle both of them. The feel is very important as is the user interface. Many stores will let you take shots inside. You can download the 300D user's manual from Canon's site and the same could be so for Sony. A SLR is more camera and might be in excess of what you need or want. The big SLR advantage is flexibility with lenses and other accessories. But, you could wind up spending more than you counted on as SLRs tempt owners to buy additional lenses and other accessories. Response time and lower noise are also notable factors. I have a 300D and would recommend that you also look at the D70 if you decide on the SLR path. I like my 300D very much, by the way. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"Philip" wrote in message ... I am looking for a new high end digital camera. I was looking at the Sony F828 but someone told me to pay that little bit extra & go for the Eos300D SLR. Is there a big difference between these apart from one being SLR & which would i really be better off buying as i can't help feeling that i will end up getting the wrong one so all posotive advice would be welcome please. Go to a camera store and handle both of them. The feel is very important as is the user interface. Many stores will let you take shots inside. You can download the 300D user's manual from Canon's site and the same could be so for Sony. A SLR is more camera and might be in excess of what you need or want. The big SLR advantage is flexibility with lenses and other accessories. But, you could wind up spending more than you counted on as SLRs tempt owners to buy additional lenses and other accessories. Response time and lower noise are also notable factors. I have a 300D and would recommend that you also look at the D70 if you decide on the SLR path. I like my 300D very much, by the way. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"Philip" wrote in message ... I am looking for a new high end digital camera. I was looking at the Sony F828 but someone told me to pay that little bit extra & go for the Eos300D SLR. Is there a big difference between these apart from one being SLR & which would i really be better off buying as i can't help feeling that i will end up getting the wrong one so all posotive advice would be welcome please. Actually, the price of the two is right about the same, so you wouldn't be paying extra. It depends on what you're looking for from the camera. The Canon is more of a CAMERA camera, that just happens to be digital. The Sony is a digital machine from the word go. It has all the bells and whistles associated with digicams, including the ability to record digital movies with sound, and an infrared filter to make recordings and pictures at night. It also has a great lens. What the Canon has is versatility and a much better sensor. Though the Sony has 8MP that is squeezed onto a smaller chip, which can create problems with purple fringing and digital noise. The Canon's sensor will give you MUCH less digital noise, clearer pictures in general and better colors. It also has the ability to accept a wide variety of lenses, from wide angle fish eyes to 500mm telephotos. Now, you will pay extra for these lenses, but you don't have to buy them all at once. The DRebel is more for a photography hobbyist, while the Sony is a high end consumer camera when all is said and done. If you are "into" photography, get the Canon. If you just want to take some cool pictures on your vacation, get the Sony. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"Philip" wrote in message ... I am looking for a new high end digital camera. I was looking at the Sony F828 but someone told me to pay that little bit extra & go for the Eos300D SLR. Is there a big difference between these apart from one being SLR & which would i really be better off buying as i can't help feeling that i will end up getting the wrong one so all posotive advice would be welcome please. Actually, the price of the two is right about the same, so you wouldn't be paying extra. It depends on what you're looking for from the camera. The Canon is more of a CAMERA camera, that just happens to be digital. The Sony is a digital machine from the word go. It has all the bells and whistles associated with digicams, including the ability to record digital movies with sound, and an infrared filter to make recordings and pictures at night. It also has a great lens. What the Canon has is versatility and a much better sensor. Though the Sony has 8MP that is squeezed onto a smaller chip, which can create problems with purple fringing and digital noise. The Canon's sensor will give you MUCH less digital noise, clearer pictures in general and better colors. It also has the ability to accept a wide variety of lenses, from wide angle fish eyes to 500mm telephotos. Now, you will pay extra for these lenses, but you don't have to buy them all at once. The DRebel is more for a photography hobbyist, while the Sony is a high end consumer camera when all is said and done. If you are "into" photography, get the Canon. If you just want to take some cool pictures on your vacation, get the Sony. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"Rick" wrote in message
m... [] The DRebel is more for a photography hobbyist, while the Sony is a high end consumer camera when all is said and done. If you are "into" photography, get the Canon. If you just want to take some cool pictures on your vacation, get the Sony. I don't see it quite like that. I bought Nikon Coolpix (first a 900, then 990 and now a 5700) because I am serious about photography and want full manual control, but I no longer wish to cart round a heavy bagful of lenses, flashguns etc. The much lower cost comes as a welcome bonus. I have been delighted with the 5700 (having come from a film SLR with interchangeable lens background). Unless low-noise at high ISO is essential, or extreme lenses are required, I see the DSLR more as a way that manufacturers can get someone just starting into buying their lenses, i.e. tying you into a brand. It's an expensive route. A good point-and-shoot is just as suitable for the "photographic hobbyist", IMHO, providing it does not get in the way of picture making. It's the photographer who makes the picture, not the camera! Cheers, David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"David J Taylor" wrote: "Rick" wrote in message The DRebel is more for a photography hobbyist, while the Sony is a high end consumer camera when all is said and done. If you are "into" photography, get the Canon. If you just want to take some cool pictures on your vacation, get the Sony. I don't see it quite like that. I bought Nikon Coolpix (first a 900, then 990 and now a 5700) because I am serious about photography and want full manual control, but I no longer wish to cart round a heavy bagful of lenses, flashguns etc. The much lower cost comes as a welcome bonus. I have been delighted with the 5700 (having come from a film SLR with interchangeable lens background). Unless low-noise at high ISO is essential, or extreme lenses are required, I see the DSLR more as a way that manufacturers can get someone just starting into buying their lenses, i.e. tying you into a brand. It's an expensive route. You've got it ass backwards: the consumer cameras are sleazy tricks the mfrs are putting over on us to force us to buy a new expensive complex zoom lens every time they update the sensor. With the dSLRs, about the time you've worn out the shutter and need a new body anyway, they'll have a new sensor out. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"David J Taylor" wrote: "Rick" wrote in message The DRebel is more for a photography hobbyist, while the Sony is a high end consumer camera when all is said and done. If you are "into" photography, get the Canon. If you just want to take some cool pictures on your vacation, get the Sony. I don't see it quite like that. I bought Nikon Coolpix (first a 900, then 990 and now a 5700) because I am serious about photography and want full manual control, but I no longer wish to cart round a heavy bagful of lenses, flashguns etc. The much lower cost comes as a welcome bonus. I have been delighted with the 5700 (having come from a film SLR with interchangeable lens background). Unless low-noise at high ISO is essential, or extreme lenses are required, I see the DSLR more as a way that manufacturers can get someone just starting into buying their lenses, i.e. tying you into a brand. It's an expensive route. You've got it ass backwards: the consumer cameras are sleazy tricks the mfrs are putting over on us to force us to buy a new expensive complex zoom lens every time they update the sensor. With the dSLRs, about the time you've worn out the shutter and need a new body anyway, they'll have a new sensor out. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"David J. Littleboy" wrote in message
... [] You've got it ass backwards: the consumer cameras are sleazy tricks the mfrs are putting over on us to force us to buy a new expensive complex zoom lens every time they update the sensor. With the dSLRs, about the time you've worn out the shutter and need a new body anyway, they'll have a new sensor out. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan I *think* I detect humour there? The last time I updated my camera was effectively for a new lens - 35 - 280mm to replace 38 - 114mm, it was chance that a 5MP sensor came with it instead of my existing 3.3MP one! For my purposes now, the 5MP sensor may well be enough, although if one came out in a significantly larger format, but keeping the camera size and weight the same I might be tempted. Actually, right now we are looking for a stabilised telephoto P&S - which will be say 420mm f/4.5 or 350mm f/2.8 (top of the head specs). Cost - about $500. What would be the cost of the equivalent DSLR IS lens? Cheers, David |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Canon Eos 300D
"David J. Littleboy" wrote in message
... [] You've got it ass backwards: the consumer cameras are sleazy tricks the mfrs are putting over on us to force us to buy a new expensive complex zoom lens every time they update the sensor. With the dSLRs, about the time you've worn out the shutter and need a new body anyway, they'll have a new sensor out. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan I *think* I detect humour there? The last time I updated my camera was effectively for a new lens - 35 - 280mm to replace 38 - 114mm, it was chance that a 5MP sensor came with it instead of my existing 3.3MP one! For my purposes now, the 5MP sensor may well be enough, although if one came out in a significantly larger format, but keeping the camera size and weight the same I might be tempted. Actually, right now we are looking for a stabilised telephoto P&S - which will be say 420mm f/4.5 or 350mm f/2.8 (top of the head specs). Cost - about $500. What would be the cost of the equivalent DSLR IS lens? Cheers, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yet another 300d vs D70 post! | Rich Powell | Digital Photography | 18 | July 14th 04 05:37 PM |
Recommendation for a Canon lens | [email protected] | Photographing Nature | 13 | July 8th 04 02:10 AM |
Which lens for wedding (Canon 300d) | Joseph Meehan | Digital Photography | 11 | July 8th 04 01:40 AM |
Canon 300D + RC-5 | Mark | Photographing Nature | 0 | May 7th 04 07:19 PM |
Sunpak flash on new Canon 300d? | Paul Proefrock | Other Photographic Equipment | 2 | November 14th 03 04:36 AM |