Fuji. So now interchangeable lenses are "luxury?"

On 06/07/2011 18:02, PeterN wrote:
On 7/6/2011 11:27 AM, Irwell wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:58:55 -0400, PeterN wrote:
Did you plagiarizer it/

Your failure to provide quotes and a link to the original is dully
noted.

He does state the report is from Reuters and provides the date
and the authors, what more do you want?


See my response to Bob Coe.


Wow, "PeterN" - a more tedious poster than "RichA" - whodathunkitpossible"?

Oh yes, you don't know the difference between
"Duly noted"
and
"Dully noted".

Noted!

On 7/15/2011 9:04 PM, Jim Newman wrote:
On 06/07/2011 18:02, PeterN wrote:
On 7/6/2011 11:27 AM, Irwell wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:58:55 -0400, PeterN wrote:
Did you plagiarizer it/

Your failure to provide quotes and a link to the original is dully
noted.

He does state the report is from Reuters and provides the date
and the authors, what more do you want?


See my response to Bob Coe.


Wow, "PeterN" - a more tedious poster than "RichA" - whodathunkitpossible"?

Oh yes, you don't know the difference between
"Duly noted"
and
"Dully noted".

Noted!

then don't respond.

--
Peter