|If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(
there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
it's to shorten long urls, so that can be very useful on usenet as
well as web based forums.
usenet is not space-limited. urls can be as long as necessary, as can
No need to deal with pesky line wrap and
risk url breakage or re-assembly required by another reader on
there's nothing to deal with. delimit the url with and it 'just
if it doesn't, then the newsreader being used is buggy. fix *that*
rather than inconvenience others.
url shorteners obscure the actual url, potentially hiding malicious
sites. they should *only* be used as a last resort in space-limited
mediums where there's no other option and only when the source can be
trusted to not link to something other than what they're claiming.
usenet is not such a medium.
It's possible the OP meant that google has declared tinyurl a 'non
safe' site and firefox is whining about that when the OP tries to
visit. it's happened before with false positives via google.
he said it was the lack of https.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|digital back for sf1||biffster||Digital Photography||4||April 28th 08 01:53 AM|
|Digital back for F3?||Aaron Blacksmith||Digital SLR Cameras||14||May 13th 05 05:03 PM|
|digital back on MF vs digital 35mm?||ColdCanuck||Digital Photography||12||January 14th 05 11:00 PM|
|digital back on MF vs digital 35mm?||ColdCanuck||Digital Photography||0||January 14th 05 04:59 AM|
|Digital back!||Mojtaba||Medium Format Photography Equipment||8||August 19th 04 11:17 PM|