A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stereo Imaging



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 4th 18, 09:16 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 97
Default Stereo Imaging

I have always been fascinated by the phenomenon of depth perception in
vision. It would seem that this is a combination of two mechanisms :

First there is the automatic simple focus position of the eye to
achieve a clear image. This doesn't depend on using both eyes and will
work just as well with one eye.

Then, there is the slight though very significant difference between
the perceived images in the left and right eyes, owing to the
difference in horizontal positions of the eyes. This is much greater
at closer image distances and dependant on using both eyes. It is my
perception ( no pun intended ), that at all close or reasonably
limited distances, that this is the greater part of depth perception.

Images, Stereo 1, -2 and -3 test this second mechanism. These depend
on deliberately misaligning eyes in such a way that the two orange
dots at the top of the image are spilt and resolved into three images.
This is achieved by staring as to more distance objects, which will
shift the left image to the right and the right image to the left.
When the images resolve to three, by overlapping of the right dot of
the left eye with the left dot of the right eye, the eyes are set to
perceive depth in the image.

Each image consists of a narrow random display of dots extending top
to bottom, where this displayed area is repeated horizontally across
the image width, with the same approximate spacing as between the
three orange dots. The eyes will lock on the display where each eye is
actually locked on subsequent repeats of the display. Now, the display
has deliberately been altered in the horizontal direction at various
areas of the whole image, such that the eyes will perceive an apparent
shift in angular position of these areas, which will be perceived as a
different depth via the second mechanism. A very neat trick that works
surprisingly well !

Post or Email if you'd like the 3 stereo
images.
  #2  
Old August 4th 18, 09:48 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Ron C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 415
Default Stereo Imaging

On 8/4/2018 4:16 PM, wrote:
I have always been fascinated by the phenomenon of depth perception in
vision. It would seem that this is a combination of two mechanisms :

First there is the automatic simple focus position of the eye to
achieve a clear image. This doesn't depend on using both eyes and will
work just as well with one eye.

Then, there is the slight though very significant difference between
the perceived images in the left and right eyes, owing to the
difference in horizontal positions of the eyes. This is much greater
at closer image distances and dependant on using both eyes. It is my
perception ( no pun intended ), that at all close or reasonably
limited distances, that this is the greater part of depth perception.

Images, Stereo 1, -2 and -3 test this second mechanism. These depend
on deliberately misaligning eyes in such a way that the two orange
dots at the top of the image are spilt and resolved into three images.
This is achieved by staring as to more distance objects, which will
shift the left image to the right and the right image to the left.
When the images resolve to three, by overlapping of the right dot of
the left eye with the left dot of the right eye, the eyes are set to
perceive depth in the image.

Each image consists of a narrow random display of dots extending top
to bottom, where this displayed area is repeated horizontally across
the image width, with the same approximate spacing as between the
three orange dots. The eyes will lock on the display where each eye is
actually locked on subsequent repeats of the display. Now, the display
has deliberately been altered in the horizontal direction at various
areas of the whole image, such that the eyes will perceive an apparent
shift in angular position of these areas, which will be perceived as a
different depth via the second mechanism. A very neat trick that works
surprisingly well !

Post or Email
if you'd like the 3 stereo
images.

I believe you'd enjoy exploring the work of Bela Julesz. Julesz was the
originator of random dot stereograms which led to the creation of
autostereograms.
He also worked on something he called textons; something like the phonemes
of texture.
--
==
Later...
Ron C
--

  #3  
Old August 6th 18, 05:59 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 97
Default Stereo Imaging

OK, thanks for the info.

These stereograms are quite good, and seem to work on the same
principle as mine.

However, I make use of what I call fusion dots, which help the user to
align eyes to perceive the depths.

Be happy to send my 3 images on request.
  #5  
Old August 25th 18, 02:15 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stereo Imaging

writes:

I have always been fascinated by the phenomenon of depth perception in
vision. It would seem that this is a combination of two mechanisms :

First there is the automatic simple focus position of the eye to
achieve a clear image. This doesn't depend on using both eyes and will
work just as well with one eye.

Then, there is the slight though very significant difference between
the perceived images in the left and right eyes, owing to the
difference in horizontal positions of the eyes. This is much greater
at closer image distances and dependant on using both eyes. It is my
perception ( no pun intended ), that at all close or reasonably
limited distances, that this is the greater part of depth perception.

Images, Stereo 1, -2 and -3 test this second mechanism. These depend
on deliberately misaligning eyes in such a way that the two orange
dots at the top of the image are spilt and resolved into three images.
This is achieved by staring as to more distance objects, which will
shift the left image to the right and the right image to the left.
When the images resolve to three, by overlapping of the right dot of
the left eye with the left dot of the right eye, the eyes are set to
perceive depth in the image.

Each image consists of a narrow random display of dots extending top
to bottom, where this displayed area is repeated horizontally across
the image width, with the same approximate spacing as between the
three orange dots. The eyes will lock on the display where each eye is
actually locked on subsequent repeats of the display. Now, the display
has deliberately been altered in the horizontal direction at various
areas of the whole image, such that the eyes will perceive an apparent
shift in angular position of these areas, which will be perceived as a
different depth via the second mechanism. A very neat trick that works
surprisingly well !

Post or Email
if you'd like the 3 stereo
images.


Why don't you just upload them on imgur.com and post the URL?

--
🔥🔥🔥
  #6  
Old August 27th 18, 07:34 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 97
Default Stereo Imaging


I have always been fascinated by the phenomenon of depth perception in
vision. It would seem that this is a combination of two mechanisms :

First there is the automatic simple focus position of the eye to
achieve a clear image. This doesn't depend on using both eyes and will
work just as well with one eye.

Then, there is the slight though very significant difference between
the perceived images in the left and right eyes, owing to the
difference in horizontal positions of the eyes. This is much greater
at closer image distances and dependant on using both eyes. It is my
perception ( no pun intended ), that at all close or reasonably
limited distances, that this is the greater part of depth perception.

Images, Stereo 1, -2 and -3 test this second mechanism. These depend
on deliberately misaligning eyes in such a way that the two orange
dots at the top of the image are spilt and resolved into three images.
This is achieved by staring as to more distance objects, which will
shift the left image to the right and the right image to the left.
When the images resolve to three, by overlapping of the right dot of
the left eye with the left dot of the right eye, the eyes are set to
perceive depth in the image.

Each image consists of a narrow random display of dots extending top
to bottom, where this displayed area is repeated horizontally across
the image width, with the same approximate spacing as between the
three orange dots. The eyes will lock on the display where each eye is
actually locked on subsequent repeats of the display. Now, the display
has deliberately been altered in the horizontal direction at various
areas of the whole image, such that the eyes will perceive an apparent
shift in angular position of these areas, which will be perceived as a
different depth via the second mechanism. A very neat trick that works
surprisingly well !

Thanks for great suggestion. I had no previous experience rith /
knowledge of imgue. Here's my stereo images :

https://imgur.com/a/Y3aWyrH
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stereo Imaging [email protected] Digital Photography 0 June 27th 18 03:12 PM
Stereo Imaging [email protected] Digital Photography 0 April 17th 18 04:09 PM
New 3D photography web-site stereo imaging and stereoviews No Name Digital SLR Cameras 2 January 25th 09 02:06 AM
New 3D photography web-site stereo imaging and stereoviews No Name Digital Photography 2 January 25th 09 12:39 AM
FA: DAVID WHITE STEREO REALIST 3.5 35MM STEREO CAMERA-1950 RICH-WA2RQY 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 March 22nd 05 04:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.