If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digital camera specs
Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? Just curious... - Eugel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Eugel Yeo wrote:
Happy 2005! I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? Just curious... - Eugel Well in fact both sensor size and the number of pixels and the type and design of the sensor are all important as are other factors. However that is not what is important to the marketing team. They use whatever is easy to sell. Pixels are easy to understand (more is better) and therefore can be sold without explication. -- Joseph Meehan 26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Eugel Yeo wrote:
Happy 2005! I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? Just curious... - Eugel Well in fact both sensor size and the number of pixels and the type and design of the sensor are all important as are other factors. However that is not what is important to the marketing team. They use whatever is easy to sell. Pixels are easy to understand (more is better) and therefore can be sold without explication. -- Joseph Meehan 26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Eugel Yeo" wrote in message ... Happy 2005! I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? Just curious... - Eugel As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others followed like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better totalling ignoring sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The manufacturers are gearing their sales pitches to the AVI (Average Village Idiot) with an eighth grade education. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Eugel Yeo" wrote in message ... Happy 2005! I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? Just curious... - Eugel As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others followed like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better totalling ignoring sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The manufacturers are gearing their sales pitches to the AVI (Average Village Idiot) with an eighth grade education. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Harvey wrote:
[] As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others followed like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better totalling ignoring sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The manufacturers are gearing their sales pitches to the AVI (Average Village Idiot) with an eighth grade education. Much more fun if they labelled the cameras: - cheap and nasty - entry level, don't expect much - mid price, we don't make too much profit from this but we sell a lot - expensive for those idiots who have more money than sense David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Harvey wrote:
[] As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others followed like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better totalling ignoring sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The manufacturers are gearing their sales pitches to the AVI (Average Village Idiot) with an eighth grade education. Much more fun if they labelled the cameras: - cheap and nasty - entry level, don't expect much - mid price, we don't make too much profit from this but we sell a lot - expensive for those idiots who have more money than sense David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:45:36 +0800, "Eugel Yeo" wrote:
Happy 2005! I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? The most important thing IMHO is the quality of the lens. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:45:36 +0800, "Eugel Yeo" wrote:
Happy 2005! I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? The most important thing IMHO is the quality of the lens. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:45:36 +0800, "Eugel Yeo" wrote:
Happy 2005! I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of image quality. Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes? Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare megapixels. Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras within a specific budget range? The most important thing IMHO is the quality of the lens. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
once agin: medium vs. digital | Steve Lefevre | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 39 | November 23rd 04 12:49 AM |
Digital zoom camera & lots of selection questions | Lou | Digital Photography | 5 | November 12th 04 12:43 AM |
What was wrong with film? | George | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 192 | March 4th 04 02:44 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras that use film? | [email protected] | Film & Labs | 20 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |