If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Touch up or re-do?
Hi All,
I recently had a professional take studio portraits of my daughter. She had pink hair clips on either side and those things are the most dominant feature of the photos. The hair clips are those little wire things with one side colored pink, so they're pretty thin and normally unobtrusive. She has brown hair and honestly I don't think the hair clips stand out nearly this much in real life. Could the digital camera have unnaturally enhanced the pink hair clips? If so, should I ask the photographer to touch up the photos to diminish that, or should I ask him to take new photos with no hair clips, or should I find a studio that uses film, or... Thank you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
yep...been there. I took some shots of a teen who had written a phone number
on her arm a few days before. It was not noticeable to the eye in daylight. But it showed up in the print. There is no predicting things like this ( I expect....though with experience one might learn some things to avoid.) Well...you put them there? The photographer took the shot you put together. Could he have known? Sounds like shared responsibility there. The only costs are in the prints. Offer to pay costs for new prints and let the photographer decide on reshooting or repairing. Starting over with a new photographer puts you in the position of paying for everything again. "LAJI" wrote in message om... Hi All, I recently had a professional take studio portraits of my daughter. She had pink hair clips on either side and those things are the most dominant feature of the photos. The hair clips are those little wire things with one side colored pink, so they're pretty thin and normally unobtrusive. She has brown hair and honestly I don't think the hair clips stand out nearly this much in real life. Could the digital camera have unnaturally enhanced the pink hair clips? If so, should I ask the photographer to touch up the photos to diminish that, or should I ask him to take new photos with no hair clips, or should I find a studio that uses film, or... Thank you. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
yep...been there. I took some shots of a teen who had written a phone number
on her arm a few days before. It was not noticeable to the eye in daylight. But it showed up in the print. There is no predicting things like this ( I expect....though with experience one might learn some things to avoid.) Well...you put them there? The photographer took the shot you put together. Could he have known? Sounds like shared responsibility there. The only costs are in the prints. Offer to pay costs for new prints and let the photographer decide on reshooting or repairing. Starting over with a new photographer puts you in the position of paying for everything again. "LAJI" wrote in message om... Hi All, I recently had a professional take studio portraits of my daughter. She had pink hair clips on either side and those things are the most dominant feature of the photos. The hair clips are those little wire things with one side colored pink, so they're pretty thin and normally unobtrusive. She has brown hair and honestly I don't think the hair clips stand out nearly this much in real life. Could the digital camera have unnaturally enhanced the pink hair clips? If so, should I ask the photographer to touch up the photos to diminish that, or should I ask him to take new photos with no hair clips, or should I find a studio that uses film, or... Thank you. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Here is the shot with the ink on the arm....and that was invisible to the
eye in daylight. Easy enough to repair on the blue channel though. http://www.dotphoto.com/Go.asp?l=pal...ID=4533697&T=1 "Gene Palmiter" wrote in message news:gKl4d.2213$Pz3.955@trndny01... yep...been there. I took some shots of a teen who had written a phone number on her arm a few days before. It was not noticeable to the eye in daylight. But it showed up in the print. There is no predicting things like this ( I expect....though with experience one might learn some things to avoid.) Well...you put them there? The photographer took the shot you put together. Could he have known? Sounds like shared responsibility there. The only costs are in the prints. Offer to pay costs for new prints and let the photographer decide on reshooting or repairing. Starting over with a new photographer puts you in the position of paying for everything again. "LAJI" wrote in message om... Hi All, I recently had a professional take studio portraits of my daughter. She had pink hair clips on either side and those things are the most dominant feature of the photos. The hair clips are those little wire things with one side colored pink, so they're pretty thin and normally unobtrusive. She has brown hair and honestly I don't think the hair clips stand out nearly this much in real life. Could the digital camera have unnaturally enhanced the pink hair clips? If so, should I ask the photographer to touch up the photos to diminish that, or should I ask him to take new photos with no hair clips, or should I find a studio that uses film, or... Thank you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gene Palmiter wrote:
Here is the shot with the ink on the arm....and that was invisible to the eye in daylight. Easy enough to repair on the blue channel though. http://www.dotphoto.com/Go.asp?l=pal...ID=4533697&T=1 Holy Cow!! Kids do the darndest things! Thanks for sharing. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' "All that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of what we know." -- Richard Wilbur |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
mmmm nice photo
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
mmmm nice photo
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message newssm4d.3443$Ec4.3107@trndny04... Here is the shot with the ink on the arm....and that was invisible to the eye in daylight. Easy enough to repair on the blue channel though. http://www.dotphoto.com/Go.asp?l=pal...ID=4533697&T=1 Those kid photos are great! It looks like you made them feel very relaxed and natural. That's not always easy to do. Nice work. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message newssm4d.3443$Ec4.3107@trndny04... Here is the shot with the ink on the arm....and that was invisible to the eye in daylight. Easy enough to repair on the blue channel though. http://www.dotphoto.com/Go.asp?l=pal...ID=4533697&T=1 Those kid photos are great! It looks like you made them feel very relaxed and natural. That's not always easy to do. Nice work. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodak perfect touch | JZ | Film & Labs | 9 | September 18th 04 05:17 AM |
Seeking a Photoshop Artist to touch up some photos | eb7g | Digital Photography | 4 | September 10th 04 09:37 AM |
Kodak "Perfect Touch" processing -- VERY poor results! | John Salmon | Film & Labs | 15 | July 31st 04 11:19 PM |
Scanning prints to touch up and print | Bob Williams | Digital Photography | 0 | June 24th 04 08:22 AM |