If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 05:29:52 -0700, QX wrote:
On 6 Sep 2006 19:56:35 -0700, "Mr.Bolshoyhuy" wrote: Seems a lot of brands/manufacturers have gotten out of the digital camera market. Some made cameras, but no longer do Here is a partial list: AGFA, Contax, Epson, JVC, Konica-Minolta, Kyocera, Sanyo, Toshiba. All big names. Whats going on here? Konica-Minolta (KMMI) is very active with their line of Digital & Computed Radiography products for the medical market. I use their Regius-IM/XPress CR systems at work and it's really awesome as far as image quality, speed, and user friendliness. http://kmmi.konicaminolta.us/ Correction: Make that Konica-Minolta Medical Imaging (KMMI). |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
It is alleged that Philip Homburg claimed:
In article , Marvin wrote: The bigger a company is, the harder it is for them to change when new technology changes hte nature of the market, which has happened in photography. There are some classic examples. For example, not one of the companies that used to make vacuum tubes for electronics made the transition to semiconductors. Except that Kodak and Fuji make quite a lot digital cameras. And a significant fraction of the companies that made analog cameras also produce(d) digital cameras. And some have transitioned almost entirely to digital. Didn't Nikon dump the entire middle-range on film cameras this year, keeping only the el-cheapos and high-ends? -- Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org The from userid is killfiled Send personal mail to gordol "Those who enter the country illegally violate the law." - George W. Bush, November 2005 describing illegal immigrants |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
It is alleged that Mr.Bolshoyhuy claimed:
Seems a lot of brands/manufacturers have gotten out of the digital camera market. Some made cameras, but no longer do; Others still do, but no one sells them, such as Casio, Polaroid, and Ricoh. I got a Casio camera at Ritz only a few months ago. They had about a half-dozen models on display. I think they had some Ricohs as well. Here is a partial list: AGFA, Contax, Epson, JVC, Konica-Minolta, Kyocera, Sanyo, Toshiba. All big names. Whats going on here? I've never seen a Kyocera camera, ever. Nor JVC or Toshiba. From what I've seen, out on the fringes of things, Minolta has been a slowly dying brand ever since they failed to make it in the autofocus SLR market, eventually being acquired by Konica, and now apparently Sony(!) if Sony's new DSLR is any indication. We are left with these. However, I do not like proprietary flash cards, anything other than CF or SD. P&S: Fuji & Olympus still use xD, and Sony uses MemoryStick (Canon I think xD was supposed to be the "even smaller form factor" replacement to SD and just never really caught on. IOW, it's not a proprietary format, it's just widely used. MemoryStick, however... that's the main reason why I eventually replaced my Sony ultracompact with the Casio. And then discovered that its speed and picture quality means I can use it to also replace my Sony regular-compact. PS: why is CF used in DSLRs instead of SD? Size and speed would be my guess. Until very recently, SD couldn't touch CF capacities, and likewise the speed issue is only recently getting even. Plus, DSLRs have the physical size to hold a CF card and the compacts don't. -- Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org The from userid is killfiled Send personal mail to gordol "Ambassador Delenn remains indisposed." "Indisposed? She's in a cocoon!" "Yes." (Lennier and Amb. Mollari, B5 "Revelations") |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
Marvin wrote:
edited, for brevity The bigger a company is, the harder it is for them to change when new technology changes hte nature of the market, which has happened in photography. There are some classic examples. For example, not one of the companies that used to make vacuum tubes for electronics made the transition to semiconductors. Hello, Marvin: Are you sure about this? I find it hard to believe, that no tube manufacturer made the "transition to transistors!" g Cordially, John Turco |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
Stewy wrote:
In article .com, wrote: them, such as Casio, Polaroid, and Ricoh. Here is a partial list: Epson, i like their printer Unfortunately they cheat you on every cart you buy. JVC i like theiraudio players Steer clear of their VHS/DVD/HDD combos, though Hello, Stewy: So sad, but true, about Epson! Cordially, John Turco |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:56:29 -0400, John Turco wrote:
Marvin wrote: edited, for brevity The bigger a company is, the harder it is for them to change when new technology changes hte nature of the market, which has happened in photography. There are some classic examples. For example, not one of the companies that used to make vacuum tubes for electronics made the transition to semiconductors. Hello, Marvin: Are you sure about this? I find it hard to believe, that no tube manufacturer made the "transition to transistors!" g Cordially, John Turco Yes - Phillips (of Eindhoven) used to make valves (Mullard Ltd was the subsidiary in the UK) and then made transistors. -- Neil Delete l to reply |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
On 11 Sep 2006 07:56:29 EDT, John Turco wrote:
The bigger a company is, the harder it is for them to change when new technology changes hte nature of the market, which has happened in photography. There are some classic examples. For example, not one of the companies that used to make vacuum tubes for electronics made the transition to semiconductors. Hello, Marvin: Are you sure about this? I find it hard to believe, that no tube manufacturer made the "transition to transistors!" g Although I can't say for sure, I'd guess that Raytheon made both. Fairchild made memory chips but I don't know if they ever made tubes. RCA made tubes, I believe, and I know that they produced computer chips. Their early COSMAC 4-bit cpu with its innovative architecture was one of the first. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
ASAAR wrote:
On 11 Sep 2006 07:56:29 EDT, John Turco wrote: The bigger a company is, the harder it is for them to change when new technology changes hte nature of the market, which has happened in photography. There are some classic examples. For example, not one of the companies that used to make vacuum tubes for electronics made the transition to semiconductors. Hello, Marvin: Are you sure about this? I find it hard to believe, that no tube manufacturer made the "transition to transistors!" g Although I can't say for sure, I'd guess that Raytheon made both. Fairchild made memory chips but I don't know if they ever made tubes. RCA made tubes, I believe, and I know that they produced computer chips. Their early COSMAC 4-bit cpu with its innovative architecture was one of the first. I think that the point was that dominance moved to other companies. RCA, which was the industry giant, basically sank without a trace in spite of some feeble efforts in producing chips. The early chip leader in the US was Texas Instruments which produced a full line of ICs back in the days when a CPU board might contain about 100 chips. Then they too lost the lead. ---- Paul J. Gans |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
why major brands got out of the market?
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:06:31 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans wrote:
Although I can't say for sure, I'd guess that Raytheon made both. Fairchild made memory chips but I don't know if they ever made tubes. RCA made tubes, I believe, and I know that they produced computer chips. Their early COSMAC 4-bit cpu with its innovative architecture was one of the first. I think that the point was that dominance moved to other companies. RCA, which was the industry giant, basically sank without a trace in spite of some feeble efforts in producing chips. That's a valid point. If only it was the one that was made. The early chip leader in the US was Texas Instruments which produced a full line of ICs back in the days when a CPU board might contain about 100 chips. Then they too lost the lead. And another maker of mini and micro computers, and I was once interested in their 99000 microcomputer chip set. Aren't they still one of the larger producers of DSPs, or have they lost the lead there as well? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The state of the Japanese DSLR market | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | August 25th 06 02:21 AM |
Gray Market Lens? | JR | Digital Photography | 5 | April 4th 05 04:18 AM |
Book: 2005 Photographers Market (Photographer's Market) | AnalogKid | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | December 28th 04 06:45 PM |
Share of Market? | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 4 | December 3rd 04 07:47 PM |
Digital Cameras Market Leaders in the U.S.: Sony, Kodak, Canon | Peter Lawrence | Digital Photography | 0 | August 9th 04 10:13 PM |