If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Just bought a fuji GA645 ... my first medium-format
Well, some of you who frequent rpe35mm may already know that i quite
like small 35mm cameras such as the Minoxes. I didn't really see much point in buying a 35mm SLR because i don't care much for interchangeable lenses and i don't like flash, and i didn't see much that a heavier/bulkier SLR would give me over a quality compact such as a Minox GT-E/S. But from researching past threads in this newsgroup and rpe35mm it seems that almost all would agree that a 645 is a significant serious camera for an enthausiast, even more so than a leica. Larger formats than 645 seem not portable enough. Encouraged by this i have gone ahead and bought a like new GA645. I have not owned a medium format camera before, but i know from the landscape pictures i have taken with my compact 35mm cameras that i could easily be a detail junkie. Having used a 3.2 megapixel digital for 3 years, though amazingly found it uninspiring, in the sense that it'd sit in the drawer for months without use, i have been quite pleased with what i get from scanning a 35mm print at 600dpi and then looking at the little details (such as a bird in a lake). I imagine that i'd be even more pleased with a 1200dpi or more scans, if i could only find a better software for my scanner, and even more so with a 645 camera. Even the most ardent digital supporters seemed to agree that a scanned 645 image is better than one had from an $8000 dSRL; i got the GA645 for $550, and being an enthausiast rather than a pro, the time efficiency disadvantages of film are not really a problem for me. I'm also pleased with the idea that, hopefully provided that it'd work without a fault and there'd still be film sold, i could continue to use it for years without worrying about what new products are out there or how badly my stuff is depreciating. I have also been encouraged by finding out that the cost of buying 120mm film is only marginally higher than 35mm, at least from the supplier i buy from. Also, its professional development is more or less similar, in the sense that sending it to a mail-in lab would be more or less similar to a drop-in 35mm service. I think shooting with a 645 would require a different mindset from a 35mm in that per image it'd still cost twice or more as 35mm (i use a mail service for my 35mm thus it's cheap). The weight of the camera as well limit its use to pre-planned shots rather than the spontaneity of having my minox in a belt-pouch (maybe rucksack for the 645). That said though, I'm really not dreading the cost of film much, as i found that increasingly i'm becoming more selective in images i take, and that all in all a 24 roll (bought and printed) would cost me less, but last longer, than a big mac meal, and i do have a big mac habit. It pales when you compare to people i know with a $4 latte starbucks habit. So, i have followed the advice of some of you guys who replied to my previous two posts, about a portable medium format and a below $1000 film vs digital. I hope you welcome me in your ranks ;-) Also, if you have tips or suggestions, or comments, please go ahead. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Just bought a fuji GA645 ... my first medium-format
I've owned a GA645zi (the zoom version) for a number of years, and the
GS645 (the fully manual predecessor to the GA) for more than a decade. Both are rugged, reliable cameras with minimal problems, they have fantastically sharp lenses, and are great travel cameras because of their light weight. I'm sure you'll be very happy with it. LRK On 18 Jun 2004 15:21:56 -0700, Mike Henley wrote: Well, some of you who frequent rpe35mm may already know that i quite like small 35mm cameras such as the Minoxes. I didn't really see much point in buying a 35mm SLR because i don't care much for interchangeable lenses and i don't like flash, and i didn't see much that a heavier/bulkier SLR would give me over a quality compact such as a Minox GT-E/S. But from researching past threads in this newsgroup and rpe35mm it seems that almost all would agree that a 645 is a significant serious camera for an enthausiast, even more so than a leica. Larger formats than 645 seem not portable enough. Encouraged by this i have gone ahead and bought a like new GA645. I have not owned a medium format camera before, but i know from the landscape pictures i have taken with my compact 35mm cameras that i could easily be a detail junkie. Having used a 3.2 megapixel digital for 3 years, though amazingly found it uninspiring, in the sense that it'd sit in the drawer for months without use, i have been quite pleased with what i get from scanning a 35mm print at 600dpi and then looking at the little details (such as a bird in a lake). I imagine that i'd be even more pleased with a 1200dpi or more scans, if i could only find a better software for my scanner, and even more so with a 645 camera. Even the most ardent digital supporters seemed to agree that a scanned 645 image is better than one had from an $8000 dSRL; i got the GA645 for $550, and being an enthausiast rather than a pro, the time efficiency disadvantages of film are not really a problem for me. I'm also pleased with the idea that, hopefully provided that it'd work without a fault and there'd still be film sold, i could continue to use it for years without worrying about what new products are out there or how badly my stuff is depreciating. I have also been encouraged by finding out that the cost of buying 120mm film is only marginally higher than 35mm, at least from the supplier i buy from. Also, its professional development is more or less similar, in the sense that sending it to a mail-in lab would be more or less similar to a drop-in 35mm service. I think shooting with a 645 would require a different mindset from a 35mm in that per image it'd still cost twice or more as 35mm (i use a mail service for my 35mm thus it's cheap). The weight of the camera as well limit its use to pre-planned shots rather than the spontaneity of having my minox in a belt-pouch (maybe rucksack for the 645). That said though, I'm really not dreading the cost of film much, as i found that increasingly i'm becoming more selective in images i take, and that all in all a 24 roll (bought and printed) would cost me less, but last longer, than a big mac meal, and i do have a big mac habit. It pales when you compare to people i know with a $4 latte starbucks habit. So, i have followed the advice of some of you guys who replied to my previous two posts, about a portable medium format and a below $1000 film vs digital. I hope you welcome me in your ranks ;-) Also, if you have tips or suggestions, or comments, please go ahead. -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |
Want to move to medium format? I am selling a Rollei 6008 Pro system on eBAY UK! | ricciaa2004 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | June 30th 04 09:36 PM |
How much RAM for medium format (6x6) scanning? | zxcvbob | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 34 | May 2nd 04 01:35 AM |
New to Medium Format: Camera Suggestions? | B.M.D. | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 22 | April 23rd 04 07:33 PM |
Medium format film printing | Todd F | In The Darkroom | 12 | April 10th 04 07:53 PM |