What program will view RAW Format picture? Freeware?

tx

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:16:40 -0800, lbbss wrote:

tx
Rawstudio
UFRaw
cdraw
Rawphoto

Just a few.

--
Neil
reverse ra and delete l
Linux user 335851

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:21:08 -0600, Neil Ellwood
wrote:

cdraw

?

Why is dyslexia such a hard word to spell? ;-;

Just a few.

Indeed. My most used viewer is the excellent Faststone, but
there are lots of good ones out there.

--
John Bean

"lbbss" wrote in message
...
tx

Irfanview. Great deal. Does lots of stuff.

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:31:38 +0000, John Bean
wrote:

Indeed. My most used viewer is the excellent Faststone, but
there are lots of good ones out there.

FastStone is also my viewer of choice. It views, renumbers, converts
format, and has other features. Free.


--

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

tony cooper wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:31:38 +0000, John Bean
wrote:

Indeed. My most used viewer is the excellent Faststone, but
there are lots of good ones out there.

FastStone is also my viewer of choice. It views, renumbers, converts
format, and has other features. Free.

Another free one is Raw Therapee

http://www.rawtherapee.com/

David

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:16:40 -0800, lbbss wrote:

tx

ufraw - not "freeware", but Open Source.

On 2 Feb 2008 20:08:30 GMT, ray wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:16:40 -0800, lbbss wrote:

tx

ufraw - not "freeware", but Open Source.

Pedantry. "Freeware" is generally used to mean any software
legally available without cost to the end user. When someone
asks about "freeware" they are not generally concerned about
the niceties of the licence so long as it costs them nothing
to install and use.

I couldn't care less whether the "freeware" I use is "Open
Source" so long as it does what it says on the tin.

--
John Bean

John Bean wrote:
On 2 Feb 2008 20:08:30 GMT, ray wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:16:40 -0800, lbbss wrote:

tx

ufraw - not "freeware", but Open Source.

Pedantry. "Freeware" is generally used to mean any software
legally available without cost to the end user. When someone
asks about "freeware" they are not generally concerned about
the niceties of the licence so long as it costs them nothing
to install and use.

I couldn't care less whether the "freeware" I use is "Open
Source" so long as it does what it says on the tin.

Open Source is significantly distinct from "Freeware".

Freeware -- The cost to use it is zero, but you do *not*
have a license to use the source code.

Open Source -- The cost to use it may or may not be zero,
but you have a license to use, modify
and/or redistribute the source code.

It may or may not make any difference to *you*, but the
distinction is vastly important to many, if not to most,
users.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:48:46 -0900, (Floyd
L. Davidson) wrote:

John Bean wrote:
On 2 Feb 2008 20:08:30 GMT, ray wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:16:40 -0800, lbbss wrote:

tx

ufraw - not "freeware", but Open Source.

Pedantry. "Freeware" is generally used to mean any software
legally available without cost to the end user. When someone
asks about "freeware" they are not generally concerned about
the niceties of the licence so long as it costs them nothing
to install and use.

I couldn't care less whether the "freeware" I use is "Open
Source" so long as it does what it says on the tin.

Open Source is significantly distinct from "Freeware".

Freeware -- The cost to use it is zero, but you do *not*
have a license to use the source code.

Read what I wrote - I don't give a stuff about the source
code licensing, I'm interested in the final product not the
nuts and bolts to make it.

Open Source -- The cost to use it may or may not be zero,
but you have a license to use, modify
and/or redistribute the source code.

Lecture me no lectures about licences I neither need nor
desire. The OP here asked about free (to him) software, he
didn't mention "Open Source" - only you did that.

It may or may not make any difference to *you*

[snip]

Nor to the OP I imagine. Go mount your "Open Source" soapbox
somewhere else please, it's not relevant to the OP's
question in this case.


--
John Bean