|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
June 3rd 07, 09:51 PM
posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
1D3: BETTER THAN THIS?
Here's an actual sized crop from a photo I took today:
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/79898815/original This was shot with my 20D at ISO 800. This is a straight conversion from the RAW file with no other post- processing done in Photoshop. To me, that looks like outstanding low- noise performance from an ISO 800 shot. I want to see some samples from the 1DMKIII at high ISO settings. Preferably, something similar with a smooth OOF background where noise would be obvious. Get to it, PW! BTW, I'd hate you less if you e-mailed me some RAW files shot with your new cammy. 
|
|
#2
June 3rd 07, 10:38 PM
posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
1D3: BETTER THAN THIS?
On Jun 3, 4:51 pm, Annika1980 wrote:
Here's an actual sized crop from a photo I took today:http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/79898815/original This was shot with my 20D at ISO 800. This is a straight conversion from the RAW file with no other post- processing done in Photoshop. To me, that looks like outstanding low- noise performance from an ISO 800 shot. I want to see some samples from the 1DMKIII at high ISO settings. Preferably, something similar with a smooth OOF background where noise would be obvious. Get to it, PW! BTW, I'd hate you less if you e-mailed me some RAW files shot with your new cammy. The 20D is well known for it's very low noise with high ISO numbers. I admit I'm not an expert on it. But this pic Bret is absolutely AWESOME!! Great composition and exposure. Wow, I can even see the tiny hairs on it's delicate legs. Beautiful shot! Helen
|
|
#3
June 3rd 07, 11:05 PM
posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
1D3: BETTER THAN THIS?
On Jun 3, 10:51 am, Annika1980 wrote:
Here's an actual sized crop from a photo I took today:http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/79898815/original This was shot with my 20D at ISO 800. This is a straight conversion from the RAW file with no other post- processing done in Photoshop. To me, that looks like outstanding low- noise performance from an ISO 800 shot. I want to see some samples from the 1DMKIII at high ISO settings. Preferably, something similar with a smooth OOF background where noise would be obvious. Get to it, PW! BTW, I'd hate you less if you e-mailed me some RAW files shot with your new cammy. Wow, very nice photo you got there. BTW I would be more then happy to send a few raw files from a 1D3, but first can you send me a 1D3? Scott
|
|
#4
June 4th 07, 01:13 AM
posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
BETTER THAN THIS?
To answer the subject line... Yes.
I hate shooting for tests...but I'll try to get on it. Actually, the eye-ball shots were at 400 ISO...straight out of camera, and shot in jpeg--so they didn't benefit from ANY raw conversion choices... Here's one of those 100% crops: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79826760/original If you try really hard, you might find noise in the darkness of the pupil...but you won't find much in the "lit" areas, and certainly not in areas lit as brightly as the butterfly background (green). -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson
|
|
#5
June 4th 07, 01:16 AM
posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
BETTER THAN THIS?
On Jun 3, 8:13 pm, "MarkČ" mjmorgan(lowest even number
wrote: To answer the subject line... Yes. I hate shooting for tests...but I'll try to get on it. Look, it is obvious that the only way we are gonna settle this is for me to do some serious one-on-one comparsions. So please FEDEX me your 1D3 so I can begin proper testing immediately.
|
|
#6
June 4th 07, 01:20 AM
posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
BETTER THAN THIS?
Annika1980 wrote:
On Jun 3, 8:13 pm, "MarkČ" mjmorgan(lowest even number wrote: To answer the subject line... Yes. I hate shooting for tests...but I'll try to get on it. Look, it is obvious that the only way we are gonna settle this is for me to do some serious one-on-one comparsions. So please FEDEX me your 1D3 so I can begin proper testing immediately. Hey, you already blew your chance to divert delivery... Your bad... -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson
|
|
#7
June 4th 07, 06:40 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
BETTER THAN THIS? *Some 100% crops*
Annika1980 wrote:
Here's an actual sized crop from a photo I took today: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/79898815/original This was shot with my 20D at ISO 800. This is a straight conversion from the RAW file with no other post- processing done in Photoshop. To me, that looks like outstanding low- noise performance from an ISO 800 shot. I want to see some samples from the 1DMKIII at high ISO settings. Preferably, something similar with a smooth OOF background where noise would be obvious. Get to it, PW! BTW, I'd hate you less if you e-mailed me some RAW files shot with your new cammy. I just posted four 100% crops...800...1600...3200...6400. There are jpegs, straight from the camera. I didn't use RAW conversion, simply because that can introduce variables. Personally, I am very pleased with the high ISO performance. -See what you think... **There is a bit of texture to the felt...so I'll probably have to post another set with a better subject. Noise becomes obvious at 6400, but is amazingly restrained at all levels (basically non-existent at 800). See below: **NOTE: Each "original" size file is about 0.8MB... 800: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933906/original 1600: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933903/original 3200: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933904/original 6400: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933905/original MarkČ -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson
|
|
#8
June 4th 07, 06:59 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
BETTER THAN THIS? *Some 100% crops*
MarkČ wrote:
Annika1980 wrote: Here's an actual sized crop from a photo I took today: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/79898815/original This was shot with my 20D at ISO 800. This is a straight conversion from the RAW file with no other post- processing done in Photoshop. To me, that looks like outstanding low- noise performance from an ISO 800 shot. I want to see some samples from the 1DMKIII at high ISO settings. Preferably, something similar with a smooth OOF background where noise would be obvious. Get to it, PW! BTW, I'd hate you less if you e-mailed me some RAW files shot with your new cammy. I just posted four 100% crops...800...1600...3200...6400. There are jpegs, straight from the camera. I didn't use RAW conversion, simply because that can introduce variables. Personally, I am very pleased with the high ISO performance. -See what you think... **There is a bit of texture to the felt...so I'll probably have to post another set with a better subject. Noise becomes obvious at 6400, but is amazingly restrained at all levels (basically non-existent at 800). See below: **NOTE: Each "original" size file is about 0.8MB... 800: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933906/original 1600: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933903/original 3200: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933904/original 6400: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933905/original That's impressive. Your really slow ISO- 800, heh! shows just the felt. The 6400 one, though, the speckles aren't just the felt. It's noise, and maybe in five years we'll get noise free 6400, but what you've got there now is fantastic. == John McWilliams
|
|
#9
June 4th 07, 07:05 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
BETTER THAN THIS? *Some 100% crops*
John McWilliams wrote:
MarkČ wrote: Annika1980 wrote: Here's an actual sized crop from a photo I took today: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/79898815/original This was shot with my 20D at ISO 800. This is a straight conversion from the RAW file with no other post- processing done in Photoshop. To me, that looks like outstanding low- noise performance from an ISO 800 shot. I want to see some samples from the 1DMKIII at high ISO settings. Preferably, something similar with a smooth OOF background where noise would be obvious. Get to it, PW! BTW, I'd hate you less if you e-mailed me some RAW files shot with your new cammy. I just posted four 100% crops...800...1600...3200...6400. There are jpegs, straight from the camera. I didn't use RAW conversion, simply because that can introduce variables. Personally, I am very pleased with the high ISO performance. -See what you think... **There is a bit of texture to the felt...so I'll probably have to post another set with a better subject. Noise becomes obvious at 6400, but is amazingly restrained at all levels (basically non-existent at 800). See below: **NOTE: Each "original" size file is about 0.8MB... 800: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933906/original 1600: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933903/original 3200: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933904/original 6400: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933905/original That's impressive. Your really slow ISO- 800, heh! shows just the felt. The 6400 one, though, the speckles aren't just the felt. It's noise, Of course it's noise.  I didn't mean to imply otherwise. The felt shows speckles in all shots, but the noise is certainly present. Amazingly little... Obvious at 6400, but amazingly good at 3200. and maybe in five years we'll get noise free 6400, but what you've got there now is fantastic. == John McWilliams I agree. -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson
|
|
#10
June 4th 07, 07:11 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
|
BETTER THAN THIS? *Some 100% crops*
John McWilliams wrote:
MarkČ wrote: Annika1980 wrote: Here's an actual sized crop from a photo I took today: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/79898815/original This was shot with my 20D at ISO 800. This is a straight conversion from the RAW file with no other post- processing done in Photoshop. To me, that looks like outstanding low- noise performance from an ISO 800 shot. I want to see some samples from the 1DMKIII at high ISO settings. Preferably, something similar with a smooth OOF background where noise would be obvious. Get to it, PW! BTW, I'd hate you less if you e-mailed me some RAW files shot with your new cammy. I just posted four 100% crops...800...1600...3200...6400. There are jpegs, straight from the camera. I didn't use RAW conversion, simply because that can introduce variables. Personally, I am very pleased with the high ISO performance. -See what you think... **There is a bit of texture to the felt...so I'll probably have to post another set with a better subject. Noise becomes obvious at 6400, but is amazingly restrained at all levels (basically non-existent at 800). See below: **NOTE: Each "original" size file is about 0.8MB... 800: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933906/original 1600: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933903/original 3200: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933904/original 6400: http://www.pbase.com/markuson/image/79933905/original That's impressive. Your really slow ISO- 800, heh! shows just the felt. The 6400 one, though, the speckles aren't just the felt. It's noise, and maybe in five years we'll get noise free 6400, but what you've got there now is fantastic. == It is impressive. But you can see from the loss of texture on the surface of the ball and the threads, that some heavy NR is applied in-camera to the jpgs.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
