If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
+ I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the
line, or brand new, but still fast. The problem Im having is with simple editing of digital images, and these are from a 2 megapixel camera. It just seems to take a very long time to open one full resolution image... 10-20 seconds maybe. Granted, I seldom use the entire image, but even cropped down, these higher res images take time... now my question. With the newer 6 and 8 and higher megapixel cameras, I could forsee an opening time of a minute or more. S-oooooo... while this kind of delay is fine for one image, it would clearly be unacceptable for a production environ; and, if we're shooting a dozen, or a hundred images in a day, and trying to process these, downright impossible. What kind of computer would be better than a home PC for this ? Does anyone make equipment especially applicable to large scale processing of megapixel images ? Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
"stuseven" wrote in message
oups.com... + I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the line, or brand new, but still fast. The problem Im having is with simple editing of digital images, and these are from a 2 megapixel camera. It just seems to take a very long time to open one full resolution image... 10-20 seconds maybe. Granted, I seldom use the entire image, but even cropped down, these higher res images take time... now my question. With the newer 6 and 8 and higher megapixel cameras, I could forsee an opening time of a minute or more. S-oooooo... while this kind of delay is fine for one image, it would clearly be unacceptable for a production environ; and, if we're shooting a dozen, or a hundred images in a day, and trying to process these, downright impossible. What kind of computer would be better than a home PC for this ? Does anyone make equipment especially applicable to large scale processing of megapixel images ? Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. 1GHz is not that slow. Start by loading your current computer to the gills with memory. Get 2 Gigabytes if your system will take it. A 7200 rpm drive will also speed things up noticeably, but that's a bit more of a bother to install. By now, memory prices will be very low for your system. At that point, you can decide whether you need to upgrade. Have a vacuum cleaner handy when you open up the case. There are many reputable places for purchasing memory on the web. www.satech.com is where I usually get mine - they are fast and friendly and cheap. -- Mike Russell www.curvemeister.com/forum/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
In article .com,
stuseven writes + I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the line, or brand new, but still fast. The problem Im having is with simple editing of digital images, and these are from a 2 megapixel camera. It just seems to take a very long time to open one full resolution image... 10-20 seconds maybe. Granted, I seldom use the entire image, but even cropped down, these higher res images take time... now my question. With the newer 6 and 8 and higher megapixel cameras, I could forsee an opening time of a minute or more. S-oooooo... while this kind of delay is fine for one image, it would clearly be unacceptable for a production environ; and, if we're shooting a dozen, or a hundred images in a day, and trying to process these, downright impossible. What kind of computer would be better than a home PC for this ? Does anyone make equipment especially applicable to large scale processing of megapixel images ? Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. A 1GHz 'home' PC should be fine, provided you have enough memory. With Microsoft Windows XP I found 1GB restrictive, with 2GB my images open quickly, How much memory do you have, and what operating system? -- Ian G8ILZ There are always two people in every pictu the photographer and the viewer. ~Ansel Adams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
I presume the computer is one of the new 64bit machines (Core 2 duo?) so I
suspect the problem may be amount of RAM available. 20 seconds for a two mp file seems very long (2MP jpegs should open almost instantaneously). There are a number of articles written on optimising photoshop (virtual memory available to photoshop, etc) and you may be able to find them via google - I read one to set up my machine in a book on photoshop. I have recently read that the watermark software is a killer with loading time so disabling it speeds things up (go to the photoshop program files and rename the watermark directory so photoshop can't find it I think).. best of luck Malcolm "stuseven" wrote in message oups.com... + I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the line, or brand new, but still fast. The problem Im having is with simple editing of digital images, and these are from a 2 megapixel camera. It just seems to take a very long time to open one full resolution image... 10-20 seconds maybe. Granted, I seldom use the entire image, but even cropped down, these higher res images take time... now my question. With the newer 6 and 8 and higher megapixel cameras, I could forsee an opening time of a minute or more. S-oooooo... while this kind of delay is fine for one image, it would clearly be unacceptable for a production environ; and, if we're shooting a dozen, or a hundred images in a day, and trying to process these, downright impossible. What kind of computer would be better than a home PC for this ? Does anyone make equipment especially applicable to large scale processing of megapixel images ? Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
Go to Program filesadobecs2plugins and the watermark folder is digimark -
if renaming it doesn't help just change the name back. Malcolm "Malcolm Smith" wrote in message ... I presume the computer is one of the new 64bit machines (Core 2 duo?) so I suspect the problem may be amount of RAM available. 20 seconds for a two mp file seems very long (2MP jpegs should open almost instantaneously). There are a number of articles written on optimising photoshop (virtual memory available to photoshop, etc) and you may be able to find them via google - I read one to set up my machine in a book on photoshop. I have recently read that the watermark software is a killer with loading time so disabling it speeds things up (go to the photoshop program files and rename the watermark directory so photoshop can't find it I think).. best of luck Malcolm "stuseven" wrote in message oups.com... + I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the line, or brand new, but still fast. The problem Im having is with simple editing of digital images, and these are from a 2 megapixel camera. It just seems to take a very long time to open one full resolution image... 10-20 seconds maybe. Granted, I seldom use the entire image, but even cropped down, these higher res images take time... now my question. With the newer 6 and 8 and higher megapixel cameras, I could forsee an opening time of a minute or more. S-oooooo... while this kind of delay is fine for one image, it would clearly be unacceptable for a production environ; and, if we're shooting a dozen, or a hundred images in a day, and trying to process these, downright impossible. What kind of computer would be better than a home PC for this ? Does anyone make equipment especially applicable to large scale processing of megapixel images ? Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
In article , Malcolm Smith
writes "stuseven" wrote in message roups.com... + I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the line, or brand new, but still fast. I presume the computer is one of the new 64bit machines (Core 2 duo?) so I suspect the problem may be amount of RAM available. ? -- Ian G8ILZ There are always two people in every pictu the photographer and the viewer. ~Ansel Adams |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
+ OK - most of these replies are suggesting adding memory...
something I hadnt even considered with the newer unit... sounds great, and thanks to all for the advice. On Jan 28, 3:50 pm, "stuseven" wrote: + I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the line, or brand new, but still fast. The problem Im having is with simple editing of digital images, and these are from a 2 megapixel camera. It just seems to take a very long time to open one full resolution image... 10-20 seconds maybe. Granted, I seldom use the entire image, but even cropped down, these higher res images take time... now my question. With the newer 6 and 8 and higher megapixel cameras, I could forsee an opening time of a minute or more. S-oooooo... while this kind of delay is fine for one image, it would clearly be unacceptable for a production environ; and, if we're shooting a dozen, or a hundred images in a day, and trying to process these, downright impossible. What kind of computer would be better than a home PC for this ? Does anyone make equipment especially applicable to large scale processing of megapixel images ? Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
In article .com,
stuseven wrote: Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. Just a wild thought - you ARE copying the image to the computers hard drive before trying to open it, aren't you? What you describe sounds more like an I/O bottleneck than insufficient processing power. Or it could be a lousy program, or a poorly configured good one. Everyone is assuming Photoshop, but you didn't state that... More RAM is always a good thing (especially for Photoshop). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
Scott Schuckert wrote:
In article .com, stuseven wrote: Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. Just a wild thought - you ARE copying the image to the computers hard drive before trying to open it, aren't you? What you describe sounds more like an I/O bottleneck than insufficient processing power. Or it could be a lousy program, or a poorly configured good one. Everyone is assuming Photoshop, but you didn't state that... More RAM is always a good thing (especially for Photoshop). Hee hee... I ran into that with someone at work... They were complaining about speed, and it turned out they were working with an image that was still (and only) on their CF card!! -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
computer for new mega-pixel images ?
stuseven wrote:
+ I use a fairly "fast" computer... 1ghz+... not top of the line, or brand new, but still fast. The problem Im having is with simple editing of digital images, and these are from a 2 megapixel camera. It just seems to take a very long time to open one full resolution image... 10-20 seconds maybe. Granted, I seldom use the entire image, but even cropped down, these higher res images take time... now my question. With the newer 6 and 8 and higher megapixel cameras, I could forsee an opening time of a minute or more. S-oooooo... while this kind of delay is fine for one image, it would clearly be unacceptable for a production environ; and, if we're shooting a dozen, or a hundred images in a day, and trying to process these, downright impossible. What kind of computer would be better than a home PC for this ? Does anyone make equipment especially applicable to large scale processing of megapixel images ? Other than using lower res images, I cant figure a way to speed up processing. While a 1ghz machine is quite slow by today's standards, I suspect it is rather more likely that you don't have enough ram for what you are trying to do, rather than the processor speed. You didn't mention the amount of ram. If you have less than 512meg, then you might consider increasing it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The move back to 2 Mega Pixel cameras | Big Brother | Digital Photography | 9 | March 7th 06 05:50 PM |
Fuji FinePix S9000 9 Mega Pixel Camera Came Out 17 Mega Pixel? | WannabeSomeone | Digital Photography | 5 | November 14th 05 05:09 PM |
8 mega pixel -which one | Leo Reyes | Digital Photography | 37 | August 5th 04 02:25 AM |
Sony 8 Mega Pixel camera | Leo Reyes | Digital Photography | 30 | July 15th 04 05:18 AM |
FS: Toshiba 4 Mega Pixel Digital Camera | Mark Martens | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 14th 03 07:02 AM |