If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ISBN 1-874416-68-0
"David B."
Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:42:21 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: You STILL refuse to address my comments about giving you an out regarding your special page. I'm not surprised; you can never change. Your demands are unrealistic. His demand is that you stop stalking people. How is that in any way unrealistic? -- https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php The best way to keep friends is not to give them away. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ISBN 1-874416-68-0
On 06-Aug-17 5:04 AM, Diesel wrote:
"David B." Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:42:21 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: You STILL refuse to address my comments about giving you an out regarding your special page. I'm not surprised; you can never change. Your demands are unrealistic. His demand is that you stop stalking people. How is that in any way unrealistic? He didn't want me to discover that he's been propogating malware on his web site. Too late now. Time for me to write to 'Go Daddy' about one of their subscribers abusing their facilities. THEY will check Charles out for sure! :-) -- Sometimes man stumbles over the truth. (W.Churchill) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ISBN 1-874416-68-0
David B. Stalker wrote:
On 06-Aug-17 5:04 AM, Diesel wrote: "David B. Stalker" wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: You STILL refuse to address my comments about giving you an out regarding your special page. I'm not surprised; you can never change. Your demands are unrealistic. His demand is that you stop stalking people. How is that in any way unrealistic? [D. B. Stalker's diversion rather than respond to the question:] He didn't want me to discover that he's been propogating malware on his web site. Too late now. Time for me to write to 'Go Daddy' about one of their subscribers abusing their facilities. THEY will check Charles out for sure! :-) Most unlikely, but if they do, they will investigate, find *NO MALWARE* and toss your stalking request into the skip. Anyone with a double-digit age and IQ will see you for the stalker you are. "propogating"? You cannot spell when you are drunk. You haven't read this one yet, have you? Your pet Sucuri is the subject. https://www.whitefirdesign.com/blog/...ves-highlight- deeply-flawed-website-malware-scanners/ -- -Charles |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ISBN 1-874416-68-0
On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 14:52:30 +0100, "David B."
wrote: t he's been propogating malware on his web site What "malware" would that be, exactly? Name it or shiut up, |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ISBN 1-874416-68-0
none@given Sun, 06
Aug 2017 20:07:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 14:52:30 +0100, "David B." wrote: t he's been propogating malware on his web site What "malware" would that be, exactly? A dead link to a non existant website. That was never actually present in the site he's claiming has malware. It's all a bogus message from the bull**** online tools he used. He has no concept of what malware is or isn't, and, the only reason he claims the site has malware is to divert peoples attention away from it. He does that because he's tried asking the site admin to remove the page describing him, but the admin won't. So, David has resorted to besmirching the site owner and the site itself. he's gone so far as of this weekend to issue threats about it. MID: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=150206165400 As I wrote in rec.photo.digital months ago, David Brooks *IS* a stalker and if he gets a hinky feeling about you, or, you don't do as he wishes for his benefit, he'll create a section in his dossier database for you and you'll experience what he's like for yourself. That is, if he can learn anything of value about you. And, he'll try hard to do so. Share personal information online and he finds it, it's your ass. When you catch him in an outright lie, this is his typical response: MID: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=150206183600 Name it or shiut up, That he will not do. -- https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php CChheecckk yyoouurr dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh.. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ISBN 1-874416-68-0
On 07-Aug-17 12:43 AM, Diesel wrote:
he's gone so far as of this weekend to issue threats about it. http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=150206165400 No threat, that is a promise! Here's some background folk can read about *YOU*. You are VERY well known, Dustin! *INFAMOUS* in fact! Spend half a hour he- https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+J.+...ngsport&ia=web -- A wave to Dave! http://picpaste.com/Dustin_and_his_van_-_JPEG_.jpg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ISBN 1-874416-68-0
"David B." news:QsVhB.271544$sL1.81338
@fx26.fr7 Mon, 07 Aug 2017 08:24:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 07-Aug-17 12:43 AM, Diesel wrote: he's gone so far as of this weekend to issue threats about it. http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=150206165400 No threat, that is a promise! I don't know what it is you think you'll gain. You have no standing with regard to the picture in question nor the site contents. Here's some background folk can read about *YOU*. They can acquire accurate background information on my simply by reading our email correspondence. I made no effort to hide anything from you, and, I answered your questions honestly, and, candidly. http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk You are VERY well known, Dustin! *INFAMOUS* in fact! Yes, I'm aware of that, thanks. It's the primary reason you sought my help in cracking into two very specific websites on your behalf. They can confirm this by reading those emails while they're learning more about me, if they so desire. Spend half a hour he- https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+J.+...ngsport&ia=web Why bother? It's filled with worthless information that was never accurate to begin with. It's called a smear campaign. OTH, It *does* confirm what I warned them about you being. So, I thank you most kindly for doing that, AND, including rec.photo.digital in your post. I don't think you'll be succesful trying to befriend any of them at this point for your own personal self serving interests. After all, you're a self admitted stalker, digital copyright infringer (especially with others pics and videos), and a drunkard. I couldn't ask for better proof. You're doing yourself in quite nicely. I appreciate your accidental honesty in that regard. Here's an example of how well your efforts are being received in the rec.photo.digital newsgroup: MID: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=150216691300 On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:31:58 +0100, "David B." wrote: Folk should skpend half a hour he- No. They should simply killfile you. so that no more of your ignorant and obsessive drivel will ever show up again. I'm not sure I even need to continue defending myself at this point. You're doing a great job of proving that what I wrote about you is true on your own. :-) -- https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php http://picpaste.com/m9WZ0KrA.jpg - David and Trisha http://picpaste.com/U5np7XvN.jpg - How to contact David and Trisha Oxymoron: Definite possibility |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|