A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"digital" darkroom -- ok to discuss?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old March 28th 05, 01:58 AM
silver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LightJet does not qualify. It is a digital printing methodolgy. Also
note that very few photographers are going to have one in their
personal darkroom.

  #42  
Old March 28th 05, 02:00 AM
silver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It refers to a mental state - a dark one.

As in a void

  #43  
Old March 28th 05, 02:00 AM
silver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It refers to a mental state - a dark one.

As in a void

  #44  
Old March 28th 05, 02:07 AM
John Bartley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

You will be the first to be killfiled.


It took you a long time to smarten up - lots of us have been using
filters for years.

--
regards from ::

John Bartley
43 Norway Spruce Street
Stittsville, Ontario
Canada, K2S1P5

( If you slow down it takes longer
- does that apply to life also?)
  #45  
Old March 28th 05, 02:07 AM
John Bartley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

You will be the first to be killfiled.


It took you a long time to smarten up - lots of us have been using
filters for years.

--
regards from ::

John Bartley
43 Norway Spruce Street
Stittsville, Ontario
Canada, K2S1P5

( If you slow down it takes longer
- does that apply to life also?)
  #46  
Old March 28th 05, 02:27 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Bartley" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:

It took you a long time to smarten up - lots of us have been using filters
for years.


Hell, I'm in my own killfile. Been using 'em since day-one.


  #47  
Old March 28th 05, 02:27 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Bartley" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:

It took you a long time to smarten up - lots of us have been using filters
for years.


Hell, I'm in my own killfile. Been using 'em since day-one.


  #48  
Old March 28th 05, 02:27 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Bartley" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:

It took you a long time to smarten up - lots of us have been using filters
for years.


Hell, I'm in my own killfile. Been using 'em since day-one.


  #49  
Old March 28th 05, 02:39 AM
John Bartley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

Hell, I'm in my own killfile. Been using 'em since day-one.


Well, at least you still have your sense of humour :-) , unlike many
other newsgroup users.

But....whether you stick with this group or start a new one for "digital
darkroom", the fact that "killfiles" even exist says something very
clearly about the lack of control that exists by the group founders.

Lack of enforcement = neutered charters.

Going to a new group to discuss digital darkroom activities will only be
controllable if the group is moderated and the only way to moderate it
it to set up a group on your own website, or to make use of the Yahoo
(or similar) services. These groups that we are currently using strongly
resemble the mess that CB radio became after the Feds in both our
countries lost control.

Back on topic.........I don't see any place in this newsgroup for
digital discussion. I've learned a pile of analog stuff by lurking here.

cheers

--
regards from ::

John Bartley
43 Norway Spruce Street
Stittsville, Ontario
Canada, K2S1P5

( If you slow down it takes longer
- does that apply to life also?)
  #50  
Old March 28th 05, 02:39 AM
John Bartley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

Hell, I'm in my own killfile. Been using 'em since day-one.


Well, at least you still have your sense of humour :-) , unlike many
other newsgroup users.

But....whether you stick with this group or start a new one for "digital
darkroom", the fact that "killfiles" even exist says something very
clearly about the lack of control that exists by the group founders.

Lack of enforcement = neutered charters.

Going to a new group to discuss digital darkroom activities will only be
controllable if the group is moderated and the only way to moderate it
it to set up a group on your own website, or to make use of the Yahoo
(or similar) services. These groups that we are currently using strongly
resemble the mess that CB radio became after the Feds in both our
countries lost control.

Back on topic.........I don't see any place in this newsgroup for
digital discussion. I've learned a pile of analog stuff by lurking here.

cheers

--
regards from ::

John Bartley
43 Norway Spruce Street
Stittsville, Ontario
Canada, K2S1P5

( If you slow down it takes longer
- does that apply to life also?)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital darkroom Paul Friday Medium Format Photography Equipment 84 July 9th 04 05:26 AM
New Leica digital back info.... Barney 35mm Photo Equipment 19 June 30th 04 12:45 AM
"Darkroom vs. digital" Mike In The Darkroom 0 June 17th 04 09:30 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM
Lost Your Digital Pictures? Recover Them - Are you a professional photographer w corrupt digital images, an end user with missing photos? eProvided.com General Equipment For Sale 0 September 5th 03 06:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.