If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
Francis A. Miniter posted:
Petros wrote: Well... I'll be using two cameras. One is a duck Sigma SD9 Ouch! Digital. I'm wounded. Don't take it personally, I also used to paint with oils and watercolor, and built most of my furniture out of hardwood, but I live in a different reality now and the other is a duck again 35mm slr. Favor the 35 mm slr. See if you can rent or borrow a second body for the day. The Sigma is mine, the 35mm belongs to the bride. I'm not doing this for money, but as a favor to the bride. As for medium format, the costs are too high here in Poland for such luxuries Too late for the wedding but you might look into a Russian Lubitel. A low cost and basic TLR. There is also the Chinese made Seagull. I actually have an old rolliflex, which just needs some cleaning, but it's the film that costs too much here. 108 frames for $6 (bride's choice) vs. 12 frames for $10, plus waiting two weeks to get it developed... For most of the graphic work that I do, the digital is the best option, as it saves me many hours of scanning and transfer and money spent on developing film and driving back and forth to the photo store. No turning back now! -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
zeitgeist posted:
Not likely to be from the sound of the shutter, probably he sees your finger tense on the shutter. One remedy would be to use a long cable release and hold your hand behind your back. A lot of pros use a flash bracket with a handle on the side and a pistol grip with a shutter release, with all the cables and stuff on the bracket handle, as well as the tilt of it, you can hide or obscure the trigger finger's flex. Good point. I'll see if I can get a hold of something by Saturday. How often does he do this? half or more of the exposures? His record is close to that of The Pill, ie. 99.9% of the time. I've run across this problem several times, usually with (possibly) abused kids and some women (again possibly abused as kids) Never a guy. Frankly it sounds like latent assholism. You know, a weasel control freak. I don't know about latent... Use a tripod, you can stand and look at the couple's eyes when you shoot and see the reflection of the flash in their eyes, the catch lights. You can see if this guy is a jerk or just has a psychological problem. If its the former you can bash the guy upside the head with the tripod and then tell the bride (I'll bet she's the one you're friends with) not to marry this creep, she won't listen, they still won't be a happy couple but at least you won't spend the rest of your life knowing you saw your friend walk in front of a moving train without saying anything. I've tried to say it diplomatically, but to no avail. She's feels like an old maid, and is willing to take whatever she can get (although she wouldn't admit to that). blink blink blink, swap swap swap. Hopefully it won't come to this, but if it does, I'm prepared Thanks for all the advice. I'm sure it will come in handy. -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
zeitgeist posted:
Not likely to be from the sound of the shutter, probably he sees your finger tense on the shutter. One remedy would be to use a long cable release and hold your hand behind your back. A lot of pros use a flash bracket with a handle on the side and a pistol grip with a shutter release, with all the cables and stuff on the bracket handle, as well as the tilt of it, you can hide or obscure the trigger finger's flex. Good point. I'll see if I can get a hold of something by Saturday. How often does he do this? half or more of the exposures? His record is close to that of The Pill, ie. 99.9% of the time. I've run across this problem several times, usually with (possibly) abused kids and some women (again possibly abused as kids) Never a guy. Frankly it sounds like latent assholism. You know, a weasel control freak. I don't know about latent... Use a tripod, you can stand and look at the couple's eyes when you shoot and see the reflection of the flash in their eyes, the catch lights. You can see if this guy is a jerk or just has a psychological problem. If its the former you can bash the guy upside the head with the tripod and then tell the bride (I'll bet she's the one you're friends with) not to marry this creep, she won't listen, they still won't be a happy couple but at least you won't spend the rest of your life knowing you saw your friend walk in front of a moving train without saying anything. I've tried to say it diplomatically, but to no avail. She's feels like an old maid, and is willing to take whatever she can get (although she wouldn't admit to that). blink blink blink, swap swap swap. Hopefully it won't come to this, but if it does, I'm prepared Thanks for all the advice. I'm sure it will come in handy. -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
zeitgeist posted:
Not likely to be from the sound of the shutter, probably he sees your finger tense on the shutter. One remedy would be to use a long cable release and hold your hand behind your back. A lot of pros use a flash bracket with a handle on the side and a pistol grip with a shutter release, with all the cables and stuff on the bracket handle, as well as the tilt of it, you can hide or obscure the trigger finger's flex. Good point. I'll see if I can get a hold of something by Saturday. How often does he do this? half or more of the exposures? His record is close to that of The Pill, ie. 99.9% of the time. I've run across this problem several times, usually with (possibly) abused kids and some women (again possibly abused as kids) Never a guy. Frankly it sounds like latent assholism. You know, a weasel control freak. I don't know about latent... Use a tripod, you can stand and look at the couple's eyes when you shoot and see the reflection of the flash in their eyes, the catch lights. You can see if this guy is a jerk or just has a psychological problem. If its the former you can bash the guy upside the head with the tripod and then tell the bride (I'll bet she's the one you're friends with) not to marry this creep, she won't listen, they still won't be a happy couple but at least you won't spend the rest of your life knowing you saw your friend walk in front of a moving train without saying anything. I've tried to say it diplomatically, but to no avail. She's feels like an old maid, and is willing to take whatever she can get (although she wouldn't admit to that). blink blink blink, swap swap swap. Hopefully it won't come to this, but if it does, I'm prepared Thanks for all the advice. I'm sure it will come in handy. -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
Thank you, Lloyd, for your good advice. Unfortunately, the equipment I
listed is all I have to work with, so I'll have to make do with it. (The Sigma does sound a bit loud, and that concerns me more for the shots during the ceremony.) I think that I've gotten a number of really good ideas from this group, and one idea in particular hit me as I looked through your site: If you can't get the portrait with their eyes open and looking at the viewer, make it work some other way. "Stacey and Cassandra" is a good example. That helps me get out of the box I was in. Thanks! -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
Thank you, Lloyd, for your good advice. Unfortunately, the equipment I
listed is all I have to work with, so I'll have to make do with it. (The Sigma does sound a bit loud, and that concerns me more for the shots during the ceremony.) I think that I've gotten a number of really good ideas from this group, and one idea in particular hit me as I looked through your site: If you can't get the portrait with their eyes open and looking at the viewer, make it work some other way. "Stacey and Cassandra" is a good example. That helps me get out of the box I was in. Thanks! -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
Thank you, Lloyd, for your good advice. Unfortunately, the equipment I
listed is all I have to work with, so I'll have to make do with it. (The Sigma does sound a bit loud, and that concerns me more for the shots during the ceremony.) I think that I've gotten a number of really good ideas from this group, and one idea in particular hit me as I looked through your site: If you can't get the portrait with their eyes open and looking at the viewer, make it work some other way. "Stacey and Cassandra" is a good example. That helps me get out of the box I was in. Thanks! -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
wrote in message ... Kibo informs me that Petros stated that: My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. I photograph people like that all the time. My trick is to set the camera to continuous drive & take a double or triple burst instead of a single shot. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- Taking a couple of shots in quick succession works for me too. I am not really at ease photographing people, and there is always someone in a group who blinks or moves their head in some way. I work with digital images and it is then usually a simple matter to clone a head from the second-best picture to replace the awkward one in the better group picture. Dennis |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
wrote in message ... Kibo informs me that Petros stated that: My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. I photograph people like that all the time. My trick is to set the camera to continuous drive & take a double or triple burst instead of a single shot. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- Taking a couple of shots in quick succession works for me too. I am not really at ease photographing people, and there is always someone in a group who blinks or moves their head in some way. I work with digital images and it is then usually a simple matter to clone a head from the second-best picture to replace the awkward one in the better group picture. Dennis |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:40:39 +0200, Petros
wrote: Thank you, Lloyd, for your good advice. Unfortunately, the equipment I listed is all I have to work with, so I'll have to make do with it. (The Sigma does sound a bit loud, and that concerns me more for the shots during the ceremony.) I think that I've gotten a number of really good ideas from this group, and one idea in particular hit me as I looked through your site: If you can't get the portrait with their eyes open and looking at the viewer, make it work some other way. "Stacey and Cassandra" is a good example. That helps me get out of the box I was in. Thanks! aug304 from Lloyd Erlick, Glad to help! That portrait is a good example of why we should keep every negative, no matter what. I was looking over old work I had decided wasn't so great, and found a few I liked. I used to be very inflexible about subject's eyes being visible. Closed eyes were just a mistake. I guess I've grown up since then! Some of our errors are actually art... regards, --le ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I don't know how to phrase the subject line... .. | Mike Henley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | April 15th 06 05:41 AM |
Is selling photos difficult? | Mike Henley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | July 1st 04 08:51 PM |
How to determine distance from KEY light to subject | Phil Lamerton | Photographing People | 12 | April 27th 04 05:49 PM |
Same subject at different apertures | Bunyip | General Photography Techniques | 10 | March 17th 04 06:00 PM |
got rid of shadows on portraits, but now subject too dark - help? | Lynn | Photographing People | 7 | October 15th 03 10:44 PM |