If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
FYI (copy/paste)
"In-camera double exposures are wonderfully creative and work very well for portraits. I love creating these in the summertime to take advantage of flowers in bloom. However, Autumn is a great time of year for double exposures as well. Fall leaves, pine trees, and holiday decor work really well with this style and the opportunities to experiment are endless. In order to create double exposures in-camera, you need to have a camera with this feature built-in. I’m using a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV but there are a number of cameras with the feature available. You can also create a double exposure look using an editing program like Photoshop but I find that creating these in camera is a lot more fun and can yield unexpected results." https://s3.amazonaws.com/viewbug_com...leExposure.pdf -- David B. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
In article , "David
says... FYI (copy/paste) "In-camera double exposures are wonderfully creative and work very well for portraits. I love creating these in the summertime to take advantage of flowers in bloom. However, Autumn is a great time of year for double exposures as well. Fall leaves, pine trees, and holiday decor work really well with this style and the opportunities to experiment are endless. In order to create double exposures in-camera, you need to have a camera with this feature built-in. I?m using a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV but there are a number of cameras with the feature available. You can also create a double exposure look using an editing program like Photoshop but I find that creating these in camera is a lot more fun and can yield unexpected results." https://s3.amazonaws.com/viewbug_com...leExposure.pdf .... what's the big deal? You can mix an endless number of images in post. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at https://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
On 13/01/2019 17.15, David B. wrote:
FYIÂ*Â* (copy/paste) "In-camera double exposures are wonderfully creative and work very well for portraits. I love creating these in the summertime to take advantage of flowers in bloom. However, Autumn is a great time of year for double exposures as well. Fall leaves, pine trees, and holiday decor work really well with this style and the opportunities to experiment are endless. In order to create double exposures in-camera, you need to have a camera with this feature built-in. I’m using a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV but there are a number of cameras with the feature available. You can also create a double exposure look using an editing program like Photoshop but I find that creating these in camera is a lot more fun and can yield unexpected results." https://s3.amazonaws.com/viewbug_com...leExposure.pdf Double exposure in film, I can understand. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote: Double exposure in film, I can understand. yep. there are far fewer options with film. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. it's different in that it doesn't require a computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? that's not required, nor would it work particularly well. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
On Jan 14, 2019, Carlos E.R. wrote
(in article ): On 13/01/2019 17.15, David B. wrote: FYI (copy/paste) "In-camera double exposures are wonderfully creative and work very well for portraits. I love creating these in the summertime to take advantage of flowers in bloom. However, Autumn is a great time of year for double exposures as well. Fall leaves, pine trees, and holiday decor work really well with this style and the opportunities to experiment are endless. In order to create double exposures in-camera, you need to have a camera with this feature built-in. I’m using a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV but there are a number of cameras with the feature available. You can also create a double exposure look using an editing program like Photoshop but I find that creating these in camera is a lot more fun and can yield unexpected results." https://s3.amazonaws.com/viewbug_com...leExposure.pdf Double exposure in film, I can understand. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm (and probably others) have a multi-exposure feature/mode which allows for two separate exposures, on two frames, which are blended into a single file. It is a bit of a novelty and nothing that cannot be done in post. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
On 14/01/2019 20.53, Savageduck wrote:
On Jan 14, 2019, Carlos E.R. wrote (in article ): On 13/01/2019 17.15, David B. wrote: FYI (copy/paste) "In-camera double exposures are wonderfully creative and work very well for portraits. I love creating these in the summertime to take advantage of flowers in bloom. However, Autumn is a great time of year for double exposures as well. Fall leaves, pine trees, and holiday decor work really well with this style and the opportunities to experiment are endless. In order to create double exposures in-camera, you need to have a camera with this feature built-in. I’m using a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV but there are a number of cameras with the feature available. You can also create a double exposure look using an editing program like Photoshop but I find that creating these in camera is a lot more fun and can yield unexpected results." https://s3.amazonaws.com/viewbug_com...leExposure.pdf Double exposure in film, I can understand. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm (and probably others) have a multi-exposure feature/mode which allows for two separate exposures, on two frames, which are blended into a single file. It is a bit of a novelty and nothing that cannot be done in post. Ok, so they do two frames, then merge or blend them into a single file. That's postprocessing, not really "double exposure" in my book. It simply emulates it, but it is not it. Understood :-) -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote: Double exposure in film, I can understand. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm (and probably others) have a multi-exposure feature/mode which allows for two separate exposures, on two frames, which are blended into a single file. It is a bit of a novelty and nothing that cannot be done in post. Ok, so they do two frames, then merge or blend them into a single file. That's postprocessing, not really "double exposure" in my book. It simply emulates it, but it is not it. are you channeling eric? it's double exposure, without any emulation whatsoever. also, a double exposure of the same scene will have less noise, and it's a lot easier to do it in camera than later. that's also part of how google night sight works. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
On 14/01/2019 23.10, nospam wrote:
In article , Carlos E.R. wrote: Double exposure in film, I can understand. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm (and probably others) have a multi-exposure feature/mode which allows for two separate exposures, on two frames, which are blended into a single file. It is a bit of a novelty and nothing that cannot be done in post. Ok, so they do two frames, then merge or blend them into a single file. That's postprocessing, not really "double exposure" in my book. It simply emulates it, but it is not it. are you channeling eric? it's double exposure, without any emulation whatsoever. Not to me, it isn't. End of discussion. -- Cheers, Carlos. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote: Double exposure in film, I can understand. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm (and probably others) have a multi-exposure feature/mode which allows for two separate exposures, on two frames, which are blended into a single file. It is a bit of a novelty and nothing that cannot be done in post. Ok, so they do two frames, then merge or blend them into a single file. That's postprocessing, not really "double exposure" in my book. It simply emulates it, but it is not it. are you channeling eric? it's double exposure, without any emulation whatsoever. Not to me, it isn't. End of discussion. then film is also emulating... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for Mastering In-Camera,Double Exposure Portraits
On Jan 15, 2019, Whisky-dave wrote
(in ): On Monday, 14 January 2019 22:10:08 UTC, nospam wrote: In , Carlos E.R. wrote: Double exposure in film, I can understand. But a digital camera would just add the pixel values from two files, thus being no different from postprocessing on the computer. To be valid, the sensor would have to be exposed, and then, without reading it, exposing it again. Are they really doing it? Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm (and probably others) have a multi-exposure feature/mode which allows for two separate exposures, on two frames, which are blended into a single file. It is a bit of a novelty and nothing that cannot be done in post. Ok, so they do two frames, then merge or blend them into a single file. That's postprocessing, not really "double exposure" in my book. It simply emulates it, but it is not it. are you channeling eric? it's double exposure, without any emulation whatsoever. It's not a double exposure it's two seperate exposures on two seperate frames. Which is what happenes whenever you take two photos. Then they are merged together something that doesn't happen when taking single exposures. Is HDR a multi-exposure technigue I'd say yes but it isn't the same as what was done in film multi-exposures. While HDR shot in a digital camera is a digital multi-exposure technique, I would consider it an exposure bracketing rather than an analog double exposure. Then you have Focus Stacking/Bracketing which is another digital multi-exposure technique which would be a royal pain to execute with film. So I'd say it was emulation of double exposure, or it could be a simulation if exactly the same method was used as would be used in film. also, a double exposure of the same scene will have less noise, The vast majority of double exposures wouldn't be of exactly the same scene otherwise they'd be little point in doing it, unless for HDR of course which is when you do take multiple shots of the same scene. Once you have the CPU of the digital camera available a whole World of possibilities opens up none of which other, than the classic double-exposure, are easily available to film. For example with my Fujifilm cameras with a single press of the shutter release, with WB/bracketing, ISO/bracketing or Film Simulation/bracketing I can obtain three individual exposures of the exact same scene with either different WB, ISO, or Film Sim all generated via the in-camera CPU. You just cannot do that with film. All of those digital multi-exposure techniques can actually be quite useful, whereas, I consider the digital ‘double-exposure’ a novelty as it can be done far better, and more deliberately in post processing, even on different days, months, or even years. Not so with film, unless by some freak accident. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WANTED TO BUY: Revere 3M model 154 double 8mm magazine loaded movie camera | Dwight D. Eisenhower | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 0 | November 2nd 07 10:32 PM |
RAW vs tif vs jpg (was Double Exposure) | Robert Peirce | Digital SLR Cameras | 65 | March 2nd 07 05:34 PM |
Double Exposure | Robert Peirce | Digital SLR Cameras | 45 | February 25th 07 04:24 PM |
Why no cameras with double exposure ? | Alan Meyer | Digital Photography | 1 | October 14th 05 09:38 AM |
Double exposure with Cannon D10 How ? | sfts | Digital Photography | 4 | October 26th 04 12:54 AM |