If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix 5700 Digital Camera 5.0MP - Question
I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? Thanks for any replies. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Matalog wrote:
I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". That last part is subjective. An image printed at that size would only be 128dpi, which based on numbers alone, probably isn't enough for a 20x16 print unless viewed from 5 or more metres away, in my opinion. Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? I've got very nice 150dpi 15x10s from my 4 megapixel camera. They look as sharp at about 2 metres as a 300dpi 6x4 looks handheld. -- -- Ben Thomas - Software Engineer - Melbourne, Australia My Digital World: Kodak DX6490, Canon i9950, Pioneer A05; Hitachi 37" HD plasma display, DGTEC 2000A, Denon 2800, H/K AVR4500, Whatmough Encore; Sony Ericsson K700i, Palm Tungsten T. Disclaimer: Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my employer shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Matalog wrote:
I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? That'd be 128dpi which is not very good, just barely passsable but probably acceptable if you aren't at all picky. 200dpi is very good, more than 300 dpi is not usable. Hint: dpi is Dots Per Inch. That would make about a 13 inch print at 200dpi. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Matalog wrote:
I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? That'd be 128dpi which is not very good, just barely passsable but probably acceptable if you aren't at all picky. 200dpi is very good, more than 300 dpi is not usable. Hint: dpi is Dots Per Inch. That would make about a 13 inch print at 200dpi. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"paul" wrote in message ... Matalog wrote: I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? That'd be 128dpi which is not very good, just barely passsable but probably acceptable if you aren't at all picky. 200dpi is very good, more than 300 dpi is not usable. Hint: dpi is Dots Per Inch. That would make about a 13 inch print at 200dpi. 13 x 16 or 13 x 9 or 10? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"paul" wrote in message ... Matalog wrote: I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? That'd be 128dpi which is not very good, just barely passsable but probably acceptable if you aren't at all picky. 200dpi is very good, more than 300 dpi is not usable. Hint: dpi is Dots Per Inch. That would make about a 13 inch print at 200dpi. 13 x 16 or 13 x 9 or 10? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Matalog commented courteously ...
That'd be 128dpi which is not very good, just barely passsable but probably acceptable if you aren't at all picky. 200dpi is very good, more than 300 dpi is not usable. Part of visual quality is the subject matter. For example, scenics or soft portraits can be printed larger, particularly if you soften them a little first. But, images with sharpness and detail - for example, my hobby is car pictures - demand more PPI. 13 x 16 or 13 x 9 or 10? I have an HP 1220C wide-bed ink jet. Even at 1280 x 960, I can get reasonable 13" x 19" prints on glossy paper *if* I'm willing to stand back and view from 3 to 5 feet. That's only 67 PPI! Note that I said "reasonable", not "great". If your plan is to go to a custom lab and pay some bucks for your big prints, then I'd agree that 200 PPI is dead minimum, preferably 300. But remember, it's not just raw mega pixels (which translate to PPI which translates to DPI) that matters, its the lens and the camera's electronics that go into whether the mega pixels (no matter how many there are) actually carry real image information. And then, people have been known to blow an otherwise good image by overcompressing if they save in JPEG rather than TIFF... FWIW, I have a Nikon 5700, and find it a little soft. I use Paint Shop Pro's Unsharp Mask at a mild setting on all of my pictures, even to view them. But, I need to be careful of too much artificial sharpening, else, I'll start to see jaggies on the near-horizontal or near- vertical lines in my car pictures. That's my take, your mileage may vary ... -- ATM, aka Jerry Rivers "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm!" - Ralph Waldo Emerson "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity!" - Hanlon's Razor Delete the reverse SPAM to reply by E-mail |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Matalog wrote:
I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? Thanks for any replies. Good 8x 10s, some possibly excellent 8 x10s, possibly a few good 11 x 14s. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Matalog wrote:
I was looking on ebay at this camera and it seems very fitting to what I am looking for. But the auction sasys this :- "The 5.0 effective megapixel CCD captures images with multiple image quality settings at a maximum resolution of 2,560 x 1,920 pixels, which is capable of producing 16 x 20- inch prints and larger with outstanding quality". Would this be true for this camera? If not, what printsize do you think I could get from this camera at maximum res? Thanks for any replies. Good 8x 10s, some possibly excellent 8 x10s, possibly a few good 11 x 14s. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NYT article - GPS tagging of digital photos | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 4 | December 22nd 04 07:36 AM |
Digital zoom camera & lots of selection questions | Lou | Digital Photography | 5 | November 12th 04 12:43 AM |
FS: 5GB Compact Flash memory Card for Digital Camera | fda | Digital Photography | 0 | October 22nd 04 03:56 AM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |