If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
"Commander Kinsey"
news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:33:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 17:02:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: No, you just admitted to being a good hacker. That's like saying "I'm an excellent bank robber". I fail to see the comparison, but, thanks for the compliment. I consider myself to be fairly good at it too. I should be, considering how long I've been doing it. Both are despicable things to do. To anyone with a conscience that is. Before I waste any more time on this subject with you, I'd like for yuo to provide me your understanding of what the word hacker means. I'd like to be able to say write that I want to make sure we're on the same page here, but, I'm reasonably certain we are not and i'm seeking confirmation at this point. Please don't cheat and google/wikipedia a copy/paste job. I want you to tell me in your own words what you think the word hacker means. Do you still think David is a good honest guy? Yes, I'm a good judge of character. Damn. That's going to make another fine tagline! Thank you very much!!! There are none so blind as those who cannot see. Oh? Have a look see at this then: David recently wrote this: Message-ID: I proceeded to answer other questions you provided in the same email asking about it. You indicated no issue with me, no accusation of my being a 'bad guy' until years later, here on usenet. That's correct. I didn't let on that you were a target and I'd scored a bullseye. Other than your known dishonesty, is there a particular reason you aren't sharing the entire contents of your inquiry leading up to that paste? I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to tell any newbies about you? *** end paste To which I responded: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155063392200 I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to tell any newbies about you? You're about as honest as you are sober, David. Say you were setting me up the entire time. Does that mean (as I accused you of) that you tried to provide a google street map view of my house on purpose, then? And when you met in person with Aardvark and discussed the matter, were you knowingly lying right to his face? Are you now admitting that every attempt you made to get to know me, to be my friend, etc via email were all lies? Are you also admitting that you told various lies to GM to have a cease fire on jenn arranged? Under normal conditions, that would void the agreement. Lucky for jenn, I see no reason for her to have any issues because you're a dishonest drunkard. Are you also admitting that you've told lies concerning other peace arrangements in play? Are you also admitting that I cannot trust a single thing you write as being in any way truthful? So have you been lying for years on usenet or the emails, or both, then David? Any reason you neglected to respond to this, days ago, David? You've been active on usenet and the www. Are you avoiding the reply because, you don't have any answers to the questions that'll give anyone the idea you're a "good guy"; rather, it'll only help to confirm (not that anyone needs further confirmation at this point) that you are in all actuality, a dangerous nutjob stalker amongst other things, none of which are good. You can claim to be something you're not (a good guy) all you like, David. It doesn't hide what you actually are (a bad guy). I already covered the part of the post he's never (afaik) shared when he's out to remind me of something I wrote, but, I'll do it again, just to drive that point home. As I said, I like to be thorough. This is the remainder of the post that David only shared a section of, until recently when he screwed up (he didn't double check, I'm sure of it) and provided the url to the post in full. Begin: I am taking the time to write you all this not because you are the only VXer "out there" but because I have a feeling that you will understand what I am trying to say and who knows... you may even take the time to think about what I am saying. I understand what your trying to say, and I'm sorry if one of my viruses ever does cause you harm. Your clearly one of the few people on this planet that doesn't just make my skin crawl. *** end snippit paste So much for that good judge of character you claim to have. -- You can't achieve the impossible unless you attempt the absurd. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 02:45:37 -0000, Diesel wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:33:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 17:02:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: No, you just admitted to being a good hacker. That's like saying "I'm an excellent bank robber". I fail to see the comparison, but, thanks for the compliment. I consider myself to be fairly good at it too. I should be, considering how long I've been doing it. Both are despicable things to do. To anyone with a conscience that is. Before I waste any more time on this subject with you, I'd like for yuo to provide me your understanding of what the word hacker means. I'd like to be able to say write that I want to make sure we're on the same page here, but, I'm reasonably certain we are not and i'm seeking confirmation at this point. Please don't cheat and google/wikipedia a copy/paste job. I want you to tell me in your own words what you think the word hacker means. Gaining access to a computer which ain't yours. Do you still think David is a good honest guy? Yes, I'm a good judge of character. Damn. That's going to make another fine tagline! Thank you very much!!! There are none so blind as those who cannot see. Oh? Have a look see at this then: David recently wrote this: Message-ID: Do you really think I want to waste my time reading a message with no ****ing context whatsoever? I've not seen what came before it, what you pasted has no meaning to me at all. [snip huge pasting of bull**** in a feeble attempt to defame someone because of some silly childish "war"]. Grow the **** up. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
"Commander Kinsey"
news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 02:45:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 22:33:32 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:33:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 17:02:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: No, you just admitted to being a good hacker. That's like saying "I'm an excellent bank robber". I fail to see the comparison, but, thanks for the compliment. I consider myself to be fairly good at it too. I should be, considering how long I've been doing it. Both are despicable things to do. To anyone with a conscience that is. Before I waste any more time on this subject with you, I'd like for yuo to provide me your understanding of what the word hacker means. I'd like to be able to say write that I want to make sure we're on the same page here, but, I'm reasonably certain we are not and i'm seeking confirmation at this point. Please don't cheat and google/wikipedia a copy/paste job. I want you to tell me in your own words what you think the word hacker means. Gaining access to a computer which ain't yours. Sigh. You'd have been better off ignoring my request not to cheat and done so in this case. That's technically known as cracking. You've watched one too many hacker movies (hehe, ****ing hollywood for you) if you think that's what hacking primarily is and/or means. Cracking is one ability in a decent hackers skillset, sure, but, that's not all that's involved and that alone DOES NOT make you a Hacker. You can be a Hacker without having entered a single system in your entire life without permission from it's admin and/or owners. If one wants to get real hair splitting anal technical with the term, one doesn't even need to have anything to do with computers to be a Hacker. -- 'I think it's good that everyone becomes food.' -- Hobbes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
Whisky-dave
Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:08:52 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On Friday, 8 March 2019 12:08:28 UTC, David in Devon wrote: On 08/03/2019 11:23, Whisky-dave wrote: On Friday, 8 March 2019 05:19:15 UTC, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" http://eecs.qmul.ac.uk/news-and-even...success-for-qu een-mary-students-at-abbey-roads-hackathon.html Most interesting, as is this ..... So being a hacker doesnlt make you a bad person. As with most things it's more complicated than most understand. That's not going to work for his slime campaign against me. Consider the contents of your reply completely ignored by him. -- Confuse people ... quote from the wrong message. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 02:09:49 -0000, Diesel wrote:
Whisky-dave Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:08:52 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On Friday, 8 March 2019 12:08:28 UTC, David in Devon wrote: On 08/03/2019 11:23, Whisky-dave wrote: On Friday, 8 March 2019 05:19:15 UTC, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" http://eecs.qmul.ac.uk/news-and-even...success-for-qu een-mary-students-at-abbey-roads-hackathon.html Most interesting, as is this ..... So being a hacker doesnlt make you a bad person. As with most things it's more complicated than most understand. That's not going to work for his slime campaign against me. Consider the contents of your reply completely ignored by him. And of course you're not campaigning against him. I seem to remember threats of police coming to his door? Does the acronym PKB mean anything to you? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:08:52 -0000, Whisky-dave wrote:
On Friday, 8 March 2019 12:08:28 UTC, David in Devon wrote: On 08/03/2019 11:23, Whisky-dave wrote: On Friday, 8 March 2019 05:19:15 UTC, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" http://eecs.qmul.ac.uk/news-and-even...hackathon.html Most interesting, as is this ..... So being a hacker doesnlt make you a bad person. As with most things it's more complicated than most understand. Nope, breaking and entering is WRONG. Cyber Security Awareness Module A Cyber Security Awareness module is available for colleagues to self-enrol for in QMplus uysing the link below: The URL to the course: https://qmplus.qmul.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=8305 All university staff have a responsibility to ensure that information that they hold and use is handled appropriately. Yes which is why I don't hold or handle such information and why we don't have CCTV in the labs, so this problem doesn't arrise, and why I haven't been on this course. Pussy. The course is available on QMplus and should take about an hour to complete. There is a short test at the end of the course. If you do not succeed in achieving the pass mark the system will only retest on topics where the pass mark was not achieved. yes we have similar things with fire safety and H&S in general and other suff which is also usually a waste of time. Ah, you agree with me at last. I managed to never even do a ladder training course, even though I regularly used one. You can buy them in B&Q FFS! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:19:11 -0000, Diesel wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 02:45:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 22:33:32 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:33:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 17:02:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: No, you just admitted to being a good hacker. That's like saying "I'm an excellent bank robber". I fail to see the comparison, but, thanks for the compliment. I consider myself to be fairly good at it too. I should be, considering how long I've been doing it. Both are despicable things to do. To anyone with a conscience that is. Before I waste any more time on this subject with you, I'd like for yuo to provide me your understanding of what the word hacker means. I'd like to be able to say write that I want to make sure we're on the same page here, but, I'm reasonably certain we are not and i'm seeking confirmation at this point. Please don't cheat and google/wikipedia a copy/paste job. I want you to tell me in your own words what you think the word hacker means. Gaining access to a computer which ain't yours. Sigh. You'd have been better off ignoring my request not to cheat and done so in this case. That's technically known as cracking. You've watched one too many hacker movies (hehe, ****ing hollywood for you) if you think that's what hacking primarily is and/or means. Cracking is one ability in a decent hackers skillset, sure, but, that's not all that's involved and that alone DOES NOT make you a Hacker. You can be a Hacker without having entered a single system in your entire life without permission from it's admin and/or owners. If one wants to get real hair splitting anal technical with the term, one doesn't even need to have anything to do with computers to be a Hacker. If you don't enter a system, you failed as a hacker. That's like a burglar who just looks through windows. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
On 3/11/2019 2:05 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:19:11 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 02:45:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 22:33:32 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 07:33:37 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" news 17:02:28 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: No, you just admitted to being a good hacker.* That's like saying "I'm an excellent bank robber". I fail to see the comparison, but, thanks for the compliment. I consider myself to be fairly good at it too. I should be, considering how long I've been doing it. Both are despicable things to do.* To anyone with a conscience that is. Before I waste any more time on this subject with you, I'd like for yuo to provide me your understanding of what the word hacker means. I'd like to be able to say write that I want to make sure we're on the same page here, but, I'm reasonably certain we are not and i'm seeking confirmation at this point. Please don't cheat and google/wikipedia a copy/paste job. I want you to tell me in your own words what you think the word hacker means. Gaining access to a computer which ain't yours. Sigh. You'd have been better off ignoring my request not to cheat and done so in this case. That's technically known as cracking. You've watched one too many hacker movies (hehe, ****ing hollywood for you) if you think that's what hacking primarily is and/or means. Cracking is one ability in a decent hackers skillset, sure, but, that's not all that's involved and that alone DOES NOT make you a Hacker. You can be a Hacker without having entered a single system in your entire life without permission from it's admin and/or owners. If one wants to get real hair splitting anal technical with the term, one doesn't even need to have anything to do with computers to be a Hacker. If you don't enter a system, you failed as a hacker.* That's like a burglar who just looks through windows. Ha! Or a murderer who hasn't killed anyone! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]A good judge of character? :)
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:26:15 +0000, Mrs Parrot
wrote: CUT_STALKING Hey, that's a pretty good forgery !!!! Only a couple of items were off. Well, three, actually. Seems like you're having "bad guy" hacking tuition. For free !!!! (you never pay for anything, you even illegally conned a software writer out of his fee and boasted about it in public newsgroups). But after 15 years hunting down "good guys"and NEVER being able to frame a single one of them, I'd have another look at knitting. You have to work with what you have, and those man-boobs are going to waste. Unless you can think of a better use for them ? To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 Nineteen Eighty-Four was a work of FICTION !!!! - Orwell |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
A good judge of character? :)
On 11/03/2019 13:57, Shadow the *LIAR* claimed ...
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:26:15 +0000, Mrs Parrot wrote: Ha! Or a murderer who hasn't killed anyone! Hey, that's a pretty good forgery !!!! Only a couple of items were off. Well, three, actually. Seems like you're having "bad guy" hacking tuition. My post was directed to Commander Kinsey, not to a shadowy Troll. He understands cats too. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Judge's House | mmyvusenet[_2_] | Digital Photography | 4 | November 26th 10 09:51 PM |
Judge Joe Brown Knows His Photography LOL | Chris Malcolm[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | March 14th 10 11:18 AM |
Judge Joe Brown Knows His Photography LOL | Anon | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | March 7th 10 06:07 AM |
Here is conclusive proof that the Kramer character was racist on Seinfeld | Target cashier facial | Digital Photography | 23 | December 20th 07 05:51 AM |
Alvin, have a ugly tag. You won't judge it. | Peter da Silva | Digital Photography | 0 | June 27th 06 09:46 AM |