A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Super Zoom" Cameras



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 13th 14, 08:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
John Turco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,436
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?

Discuss, please!

John
  #2  
Old November 13th 14, 10:02 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

On 2014-11-13 20:57:14 +0000, John Turco said:

With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?

Discuss, please!

John


The old resident expert on these things seems to have dropped off the
planet, and all of us are thankful for that.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #3  
Old November 13th 14, 10:35 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Martin Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 821
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote:

With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?


Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of
freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed
things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom.

I am sure the marketing men will push for ever larger numbers now that
they have pretty much maxed out the pixel count.

Discuss, please!

John


IMHO anything above 10x is empty magnification at the high end and/or
distorted at the short end. The latter can be fiddled out in firmware.

Even if you have the real magnification it needs a very good tripod or
active stabilisation to use lenses with EFL 500mm on a 35mm camera.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown
  #4  
Old November 14th 14, 12:14 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Oregonian Haruspex
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 94
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

On 2014-11-13 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown said:

On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote:


Even if you have the real magnification it needs a very good tripod or
active stabilisation to use lenses with EFL 500mm on a 35mm camera.


Or imagers that are capable of higher and higher ISO speeds with
acceptable image quality. And they are getting better all the time.

  #5  
Old November 14th 14, 02:12 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 88
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown
wrote:

On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote:

With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?


Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of
freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed
things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom.

I am sure the marketing men will push for ever larger numbers now that
they have pretty much maxed out the pixel count.

Discuss, please!

John


IMHO anything above 10x is empty magnification at the high end and/or
distorted at the short end. The latter can be fiddled out in firmware.

Even if you have the real magnification it needs a very good tripod or
active stabilisation to use lenses with EFL 500mm on a 35mm camera.



dumb guy question here, what do you mean by "rescale images"?
  #6  
Old November 14th 14, 01:43 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Martin Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 821
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

On 14/11/2014 02:12, charles wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown
wrote:

On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote:

With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?


Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of
freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed
things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom.


dumb guy question here, what do you mean by "rescale images"?


OK. On a traditional film camera you have to make the image with a lens
fully corrected for longitudinal and lateral chromatic abberation. That
is in good focus on the film plane and with the same magnification for
all wavelengths (or a close approximation to it). Usually exact at two
specific wavelengths or at three in the case of true APOs.

On a modern digital camera the lens designer has an additional degree of
freedom in that he only has to get the image properly in focus. The RGB
images can have slightly different magnifications and then be adjusted
later in the demosaic process to produce a final image.

You can't do that on film so it wasn't explored until fairly recently.
It would look terrible with rainbow fringes at the edge of frame.

Same with other geometric distortions like barrel and pincushion - they
can be compensated out in post processing by knowing the lens details.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown
  #7  
Old November 14th 14, 02:30 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
(PeteCresswell)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

Per John Turco:
What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?


I don't know much about photography, but I have a few IP cameras - one
of which does 32x zoom. http://ExtremeSurfCam.DynDNS.org "Toledo
Avenue".

My experience is that, at 32x, what I call "Atmospherics" comes in to
play. Don't know enough to discuss details, but the bottom line is that
on some days the image is pretty good and on other days the image is
close to useless.
--
Pete Cresswell
  #8  
Old November 14th 14, 08:58 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 88
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:43:10 +0000, Martin Brown
wrote:

On 14/11/2014 02:12, charles wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown
wrote:

On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote:

With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?

Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of
freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed
things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom.


dumb guy question here, what do you mean by "rescale images"?


OK. On a traditional film camera you have to make the image with a lens
fully corrected for longitudinal and lateral chromatic abberation. That
is in good focus on the film plane and with the same magnification for
all wavelengths (or a close approximation to it). Usually exact at two
specific wavelengths or at three in the case of true APOs.

On a modern digital camera the lens designer has an additional degree of
freedom in that he only has to get the image properly in focus. The RGB
images can have slightly different magnifications and then be adjusted
later in the demosaic process to produce a final image.

You can't do that on film so it wasn't explored until fairly recently.
It would look terrible with rainbow fringes at the edge of frame.

Same with other geometric distortions like barrel and pincushion - they
can be compensated out in post processing by knowing the lens details.



Ah, clear now. Thank you.
  #10  
Old November 15th 14, 11:01 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
John McWilliams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default "Super Zoom" Cameras

On 11/13/14 PDT, 2:02 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-11-13 20:57:14 +0000, John Turco said:

With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x
ever be achieved?

Discuss, please!

John


The old resident expert on these things seems to have dropped off the
planet, and all of us are thankful for that.

Who, Steve Young??
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony uses "pellicle" approach in new EVF "SLT"cameras (a33 and a55). Alan Browne Digital SLR Cameras 5 August 27th 10 09:32 PM
"Corset-Boi" Bob "Lionel Lauer" Larter has grown a "pair" and returned to AUK................ \The Great One\ Digital Photography 0 July 14th 09 12:04 AM
Are "D" and "Di" zoom lenses the same? Jeff Digital SLR Cameras 3 December 12th 06 10:16 AM
Q: "baby" Linhof Super Technika D. Medium Format Photography Equipment 0 April 2nd 06 08:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.