If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm
equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? Discuss, please! John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
On 2014-11-13 20:57:14 +0000, John Turco said:
With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? Discuss, please! John The old resident expert on these things seems to have dropped off the planet, and all of us are thankful for that. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote:
With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom. I am sure the marketing men will push for ever larger numbers now that they have pretty much maxed out the pixel count. Discuss, please! John IMHO anything above 10x is empty magnification at the high end and/or distorted at the short end. The latter can be fiddled out in firmware. Even if you have the real magnification it needs a very good tripod or active stabilisation to use lenses with EFL 500mm on a 35mm camera. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
On 2014-11-13 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown said:
On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote: Even if you have the real magnification it needs a very good tripod or active stabilisation to use lenses with EFL 500mm on a 35mm camera. Or imagers that are capable of higher and higher ISO speeds with acceptable image quality. And they are getting better all the time. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown
wrote: On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote: With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom. I am sure the marketing men will push for ever larger numbers now that they have pretty much maxed out the pixel count. Discuss, please! John IMHO anything above 10x is empty magnification at the high end and/or distorted at the short end. The latter can be fiddled out in firmware. Even if you have the real magnification it needs a very good tripod or active stabilisation to use lenses with EFL 500mm on a 35mm camera. dumb guy question here, what do you mean by "rescale images"? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
On 14/11/2014 02:12, charles wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown wrote: On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote: With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom. dumb guy question here, what do you mean by "rescale images"? OK. On a traditional film camera you have to make the image with a lens fully corrected for longitudinal and lateral chromatic abberation. That is in good focus on the film plane and with the same magnification for all wavelengths (or a close approximation to it). Usually exact at two specific wavelengths or at three in the case of true APOs. On a modern digital camera the lens designer has an additional degree of freedom in that he only has to get the image properly in focus. The RGB images can have slightly different magnifications and then be adjusted later in the demosaic process to produce a final image. You can't do that on film so it wasn't explored until fairly recently. It would look terrible with rainbow fringes at the edge of frame. Same with other geometric distortions like barrel and pincushion - they can be compensated out in post processing by knowing the lens details. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
Per John Turco:
What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? I don't know much about photography, but I have a few IP cameras - one of which does 32x zoom. http://ExtremeSurfCam.DynDNS.org "Toledo Avenue". My experience is that, at 32x, what I call "Atmospherics" comes in to play. Don't know enough to discuss details, but the bottom line is that on some days the image is pretty good and on other days the image is close to useless. -- Pete Cresswell |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:43:10 +0000, Martin Brown
wrote: On 14/11/2014 02:12, charles wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:35:27 +0000, Martin Brown wrote: On 13/11/2014 20:57, John Turco wrote: With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? Diffraction limits and geometric abberations. The extra degrees of freedom offered by being able to rescale the RGB images have allowed things to progress well beyond the old heuristic of 3-4x optical zoom. dumb guy question here, what do you mean by "rescale images"? OK. On a traditional film camera you have to make the image with a lens fully corrected for longitudinal and lateral chromatic abberation. That is in good focus on the film plane and with the same magnification for all wavelengths (or a close approximation to it). Usually exact at two specific wavelengths or at three in the case of true APOs. On a modern digital camera the lens designer has an additional degree of freedom in that he only has to get the image properly in focus. The RGB images can have slightly different magnifications and then be adjusted later in the demosaic process to produce a final image. You can't do that on film so it wasn't explored until fairly recently. It would look terrible with rainbow fringes at the edge of frame. Same with other geometric distortions like barrel and pincushion - they can be compensated out in post processing by knowing the lens details. Ah, clear now. Thank you. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Super Zoom" Cameras
On 11/13/14 PDT, 2:02 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-11-13 20:57:14 +0000, John Turco said: With these devices now having reached 65x optical zoom (35mm equivalent), where will it end? What's the practical limit? Will 100x ever be achieved? Discuss, please! John The old resident expert on these things seems to have dropped off the planet, and all of us are thankful for that. Who, Steve Young?? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony uses "pellicle" approach in new EVF "SLT"cameras (a33 and a55). | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 5 | August 27th 10 09:32 PM |
"Corset-Boi" Bob "Lionel Lauer" Larter has grown a "pair" and returned to AUK................ | \The Great One\ | Digital Photography | 0 | July 14th 09 12:04 AM |
Are "D" and "Di" zoom lenses the same? | Jeff | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | December 12th 06 10:16 AM |
Q: "baby" Linhof Super Technika | D. | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 0 | April 2nd 06 08:51 PM |