If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Before you by an expensive camera, read this and laugh !!
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm
And this for the noise and resolution worried: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/dslr...ison/index.htm I think I´ll wait to spend 5000,- for any camera until I´m rich ;-)) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Before you by an expensive camera, read this and laugh !!
On Aug 23, 6:12 am, "Sosumi" wrote:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm And this for the noise and resolution worried: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/dslr...ison/index.htm I think I´ll wait to spend 5000,- for any camera until I´m rich ;-)) "Maybe because it's entirely an artist's eye, patience and skill that makes an image and not his tools. Even Ansel said "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." This is the guy--Rockwell--who reviews cameras he's never even seen, never mind held in his hand. And he equates his statement with that of Adams? And calls Ansel Adams by his first name, as if they were friends. It is not "entirely and artist's eye, patience and skill" that goes into an image. Some kind of camera is needed. The fact that fine shots can be made with something other than a $5,000 DSLR is no news to anyone, except maybe Rockwell and you. I've always wondered why, if an artist's tools are so damned unimportant, all the painters I've known or read of spend so much time selecting expensive brushes, as well as often mixing their own paints to get just the right tones. What it is, is: A good photographer (artist?) can get better shots from ANY camera, cheap or expensive, than can someone without skills and patience. This is news? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Before you by an expensive camera, read this and laugh !!
"Charlie Self" wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 23, 6:12 am, "Sosumi" wrote: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm And this for the noise and resolution worried: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/dslr...ison/index.htm I think I´ll wait to spend 5000,- for any camera until I´m rich ;-)) What it is, is: A good photographer (artist?) can get better shots from ANY camera, cheap or expensive, than can someone without skills and patience. This is news? Reminds me of the story where a photographer has a party and one woman, looking at some of the photos on his wall, says "You must have a very good camera". The same photographer at a later time is at a dinner party at the same woman's home and compliments her after the meal with "You must have some very fine pots". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flipped canoe with expensive camera in backpack- Lens cleaning? | DoubleL | Digital Photography | 11 | August 15th 06 01:21 AM |
Less expensive alternative to 400mm camera telephoto | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 8 | January 19th 06 11:04 PM |
Standalone camera which upload pictures on button press ? Not too expensive... | Martin Maurer | Digital Photography | 0 | February 27th 05 09:12 PM |
Want a good laugh, read this! | All Things Mopar | Digital Photography | 41 | January 14th 05 04:20 AM |
Want a good laugh, read this! | All Things Mopar | Digital Photography | 0 | January 11th 05 03:06 AM |