If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
YO! Problem solved!! From horrible negative to solution...
Who remember previous post about an horrible negative of mine?
I have done today four tests, with four different developers, new fix and reduced fix time. Like you suggested there is something wrong in fix... test test test!! Alone in the dark testing today!! Is a rainy day!! I really think that the negative was destroyed by two differents factors at the same time. First of all I was helped by a friend in preparing the fix solution and other stuff, bEcause he was a friends who wanted to learn more on photography, ok? First reason: He says to me that he did fix solution slightly more concentrated than usual, like I use to do. But alot more concentrated: 1:3 instead instead **1+3,5** that is very different with rapid fixers. So I think that more acidic environment subtle wounded the emoulsion. Then a excessive fixing time: 10' instead of 5'-7,5' as I do when FRESH. More fixing time and concentration, this time and with this rolls, not did more bleach on highlits, like many books says but makes like burns and bubbles on the emulsion. Second reason: not stable water temperature. usually in my lab there is always 24°C. This time i can see that there are a couple of °C more high and low. But i beleieve that this cannot affect at all the washing but can help in desruption of film. Sorry people for using NG as reporting my esperiments, but after this i feel more sure of my self (and of course, less of my learning friend.... ) Today tests results with as usual stock treatments? Perfect negatives... and I feel more comfortable with myself! Ciao, Stefano -- Non è bello cio che è bello figuriamoci cio che è brutto! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:45:00 GMT, stefano bramato
wrote: .... Sorry people for using NG as reporting my esperiments, but after this i feel more sure of my self (and of course, less of my learning friend.... .... sep2704 from Lloyd Erlick, Don't be sorry! That is the purpose of this medium! Besides, where else will you find anyone interested enough to listen? It keeps us from boring our friends... regards, --le ps -- keep posting your experiments... ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________ -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Don't be sorry! That is the purpose of this medium!
i hope so! Besides, where else will you find anyone interested enough to listen? It keeps us from boring our friends... yo! You're right!! In these times I feel like stranger. in a digital world, as thirty y.o. man I feel quite strange when I say that I continue to experiment, to learn, and to test film apparels!! OTOH i don't want to let get rust my old rolleis and my contax as well: they give me satisfactions!! And the film, the dark chamber, and so forth is a missing magic!! CiaO!! ps -- keep posting your experiments... Yes I will do with lot of pleasure!! HOping not too much destroying my negatives,,, ehe! -- Non è bello cio che è bello figuriamoci cio che è brutto! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
stefano bramato
Take it easy on that film!! Try unadulterated ammonium thiosulfate 60%. Dilute it 1:24 if you use 500ml per roll as I do with 120 Pan F+. Or try 16 grams of the sodium anhydrous form in the same volume of water. Use the fix one-shot. The higher speed film you use may require a little more of the concentrate. Worst case for film fixer is the entirely unexposed roll or sheet of film. Testing will determine that worst case amount. Try to be nice to your film. Give it or them a fresh, gentle fix. Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
stefano bramato
Take it easy on that film!! Try unadulterated ammonium thiosulfate 60%. Dilute it 1:24 if you use 500ml per roll as I do with 120 Pan F+. Or try 16 grams of the sodium anhydrous form in the same volume of water. Use the fix one-shot. The higher speed film you use may require a little more of the concentrate. Worst case for film fixer is the entirely unexposed roll or sheet of film. Testing will determine that worst case amount. Try to be nice to your film. Give it or them a fresh, gentle fix. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Take it easy on that film!! Try unadulterated ammonium
thiosulfate 60%. Dilute it 1:24 if you use 500ml per roll as I do with 120 Pan F+. Or try 16 grams of the sodium anhydrous form in the same volume of water. Use the fix one-shot. The higher speed film you use may require a little more of the concentrate. Worst case for film fixer is the entirely unexposed roll or sheet of film. Testing will determine that worst case amount. Try to be nice to your film. Give it or them a fresh, gentle fix. Dan OK Dan!! Thanks for your suggestions!! -- Non è bello cio che è bello figuriamoci cio che è brutto! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
whazzup on my negative YO!! problem solved!! | Stefano Bramato | In The Darkroom | 4 | September 8th 04 12:36 AM |
How do I calibrate my photographic process | Alan Smithee | In The Darkroom | 66 | August 31st 04 04:45 PM |
What densities at which zones? | ~BitPump | Large Format Photography Equipment | 24 | August 13th 04 04:15 AM |
Kodak on Variable Film Development: NO! | Michael Scarpitti | In The Darkroom | 276 | August 12th 04 10:42 PM |