If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"John Walton" wrote in message ...
It can be done -- but you have to be more careful than with fiber papers -- the first little dab of very light ink will soften up the gelatin. Frankly, I found that the time it took to clean the negatives was less than the time it to spot a print. Try PEC and PEC wipes -- they should be available in Italy. Having a bit of humidity in the darkroom also helps keep dust down. If you clean your darkroom wait a few days for the dust to settle back before printing. "piterengel" wrote in message om... Hi, I need to spotting some b/w photos printed on RC paper. I've never done this before, so any help is welcome. Thanks all piterengel Sorry for my ignorance but... what are PEC and PEC wipes? Thanks |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Piterengel--
Suggest you get yourself a package of "SpotPens." (That's their branded name.) They come in a graded series of ten shades of increasing density, from an almost-white gray to nearly black. They have very sharp points, so you can make REALLY small dots, building the density as Darkroommike suggests. You don't have to mix-and-match, as with using SpotTone or some similar dye. You simply choose the shade most closely matching the background and go to it. In 50 years of darkroom work, I've never found anything easier and more effective to use in spotting prints. (I second the notion about clean negatives, though. Prevention vs. cure idea.) Cheers, Dick Behan "piterengel" wrote in message om... Hi, I need to spotting some b/w photos printed on RC paper. I've never done this before, so any help is welcome. Thanks all piterengel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"R.W. Behan" wrote in message ...
Piterengel-- Suggest you get yourself a package of "SpotPens." (That's their branded name.) They come in a graded series of ten shades of increasing density, from an almost-white gray to nearly black. They have very sharp points, so you can make REALLY small dots, building the density as Darkroommike suggests. You don't have to mix-and-match, as with using SpotTone or some similar dye. You simply choose the shade most closely matching the background and go to it. In 50 years of darkroom work, I've never found anything easier and more effective to use in spotting prints. (I second the notion about clean negatives, though. Prevention vs. cure idea.) Cheers, Dick Behan "piterengel" wrote in message om... Hi, I need to spotting some b/w photos printed on RC paper. I've never done this before, so any help is welcome. Thanks all piterengel I think to follow the last indication. In Italy a complete set of pens costs 45 euros (40 dollars) so they are not expensive. Cleaning more carefully the negative cuold be an idea, I'm a chemistry so I've no problems to purchase some very pure isopropyl alcohol (PEC-12, isn't it?). But in my opinion this is not the solution in my particular case. In fact you must consider these points: - I've enlarged 12x a 24x36 negative, so any very little dot in it is obviously magnificated on print. - Most of these dots are generated, in my opinion, by the fact that I've developed the film (Ilford FP4+) in XTOL: this film was the third treated with the same solution, increasing developmnet time. This is an error I really don't repeat anymore! So I presume that a further wash take no great effects. Thanks all piterengel |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"R.W. Behan" wrote in message ...
Piterengel-- Suggest you get yourself a package of "SpotPens." (That's their branded name.) They come in a graded series of ten shades of increasing density, from an almost-white gray to nearly black. They have very sharp points, so you can make REALLY small dots, building the density as Darkroommike suggests. You don't have to mix-and-match, as with using SpotTone or some similar dye. You simply choose the shade most closely matching the background and go to it. In 50 years of darkroom work, I've never found anything easier and more effective to use in spotting prints. (I second the notion about clean negatives, though. Prevention vs. cure idea.) Cheers, Dick Behan "piterengel" wrote in message om... Hi, I need to spotting some b/w photos printed on RC paper. I've never done this before, so any help is welcome. Thanks all piterengel I think to follow the last indication. In Italy a complete set of pens costs 45 euros (40 dollars) so they are not expensive. Cleaning more carefully the negative cuold be an idea, I'm a chemistry so I've no problems to purchase some very pure isopropyl alcohol (PEC-12, isn't it?). But in my opinion this is not the solution in my particular case. In fact you must consider these points: - I've enlarged 12x a 24x36 negative, so any very little dot in it is obviously magnificated on print. - Most of these dots are generated, in my opinion, by the fact that I've developed the film (Ilford FP4+) in XTOL: this film was the third treated with the same solution, increasing developmnet time. This is an error I really don't repeat anymore! So I presume that a further wash take no great effects. Thanks all piterengel |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"piterengel" wrote in message om... Hi, I need to spotting some b/w photos printed on RC paper. I've never done this before, so any help is welcome. Thanks all piterengel The technique is exactly the same. The emulsion and overcoating for RC is identical to that used for fiber. The rate of absorption of retouching dye will depend partlly on the hardness of the gelatin layers to it will vary depending on whether a hardening or non-hardening fixer was used. Sometimes putting a very small amount of an alkali in the water with which the dye is diluted will improve absorption. Spotone advises diluted with an Alkaseltzer but a pinch of bicarbonate of soda should do it. I find that using an almost dry brush works best. Glossy surfaces are going to hard to retouch and the retouching shows more than it will on a textured or matte surface. This is true of both RC and fiber. For textured or matte surfaces I find that a Wolf's Carbon pencil is often an easier way to spot prints than dye. These marks from these pencils are not shiny as are the marks from common writing or drawing pencils. Wolf's were discontinued for a long time but were put back on the market a few years ago and are generally available in art supply stores (probably even in Italy:-) ) -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"piterengel" wrote in message om... Hi, I need to spotting some b/w photos printed on RC paper. I've never done this before, so any help is welcome. Thanks all piterengel The technique is exactly the same. The emulsion and overcoating for RC is identical to that used for fiber. The rate of absorption of retouching dye will depend partlly on the hardness of the gelatin layers to it will vary depending on whether a hardening or non-hardening fixer was used. Sometimes putting a very small amount of an alkali in the water with which the dye is diluted will improve absorption. Spotone advises diluted with an Alkaseltzer but a pinch of bicarbonate of soda should do it. I find that using an almost dry brush works best. Glossy surfaces are going to hard to retouch and the retouching shows more than it will on a textured or matte surface. This is true of both RC and fiber. For textured or matte surfaces I find that a Wolf's Carbon pencil is often an easier way to spot prints than dye. These marks from these pencils are not shiny as are the marks from common writing or drawing pencils. Wolf's were discontinued for a long time but were put back on the market a few years ago and are generally available in art supply stores (probably even in Italy:-) ) -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spotone help | Mike | In The Darkroom | 11 | June 19th 04 06:41 PM |