A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The next big advance in digital



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old September 16th 04, 06:32 PM
Dallas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly that!

--
Dallas www.dallasdahms.com
"Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted
Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded"
- Sixto Rodriguez

  #42  
Old September 16th 04, 09:37 PM
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dallas" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash

card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly

that!

Why not a direct connection to your publisher via cell phone? - As soon as
you take the picture, he says, "No, that's not close enough. Go in about 30
more feet, and shoot it again, and put a little more feeling in it this
time!"


  #43  
Old September 16th 04, 09:37 PM
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dallas" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash

card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly

that!

Why not a direct connection to your publisher via cell phone? - As soon as
you take the picture, he says, "No, that's not close enough. Go in about 30
more feet, and shoot it again, and put a little more feeling in it this
time!"


  #44  
Old September 17th 04, 12:06 AM
McLeod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:32:35 +0200, Dallas
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly that!


You missed it by over a year. The D2H also had that.
  #45  
Old September 17th 04, 12:06 AM
McLeod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:32:35 +0200, Dallas
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly that!


You missed it by over a year. The D2H also had that.
  #46  
Old September 17th 04, 01:34 AM
Mark M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dallas" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash

card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly

that!

It's been announced for many many months, Dallas (D2h).

This is part of the reason why I assumed you must have meant wireless over
**long distances**--because Nikon already had close proximity wireless
transfer.



  #47  
Old September 17th 04, 11:53 AM
Bob Hickey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark M" wrote in message
news:jkq2d.301021$Oi.266440@fed1read04...

"Dallas" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash

card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly

that!

It's been announced for many many months, Dallas (D2h).

This is part of the reason why I assumed you must have meant wireless over
**long distances**--because Nikon already had close proximity wireless
transfer.

I remember once, I watched my stepdaughters flight come in.
When it stopped, I used a pay phone to call her on her cell. They told me:
$9 for the first minute. IOWs, the equivalent of a roll of 36 would run
$324. I don't see these gems flying off the shelves. Bob Hickey


  #48  
Old September 17th 04, 11:53 AM
Bob Hickey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark M" wrote in message
news:jkq2d.301021$Oi.266440@fed1read04...

"Dallas" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash

card,
but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless connection of
some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly

that!

It's been announced for many many months, Dallas (D2h).

This is part of the reason why I assumed you must have meant wireless over
**long distances**--because Nikon already had close proximity wireless
transfer.

I remember once, I watched my stepdaughters flight come in.
When it stopped, I used a pay phone to call her on her cell. They told me:
$9 for the first minute. IOWs, the equivalent of a roll of 36 would run
$324. I don't see these gems flying off the shelves. Bob Hickey


  #49  
Old September 17th 04, 04:35 PM
Dallas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:06:25 -0500, McLeod wrote:

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:32:35 +0200, Dallas
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash
card, but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless
connection of some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly
that!


You missed it by over a year. The D2H also had that.


That probably happened while I was still living in Canon wasteland!

--
Dallas www.dallasdahms.com
"Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted
Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded"
- Sixto Rodriguez

  #50  
Old September 17th 04, 04:35 PM
Dallas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:06:25 -0500, McLeod wrote:

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:32:35 +0200, Dallas
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:36 +0200, Dallas wrote:

Imagine you're working in the studio, or out on the sports field and
whatever shots you are taking are downloaded not to a Compact Flash
card, but directly to your computer via a high speed, wireless
connection of some sort.

Wouldn't *that* be cool?


Wow! The words were no sooner off my keyboard and the D2X has exactly
that!


You missed it by over a year. The D2H also had that.


That probably happened while I was still living in Canon wasteland!

--
Dallas www.dallasdahms.com
"Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted
Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded"
- Sixto Rodriguez

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will digital photography ever stabilize? Alfred Molon Digital Photography 37 June 30th 04 08:11 PM
New Leica digital back info.... Barney 35mm Photo Equipment 19 June 30th 04 12:45 AM
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 June 19th 04 05:48 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.