If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ARGUS - DARPA's All-Seeing Eye
me wrote:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...tId=b logDest Ha, an array of cell phone camera sensors. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ARGUS - DARPA's All-Seeing Eye
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:17:17 -0800, Paul Furman
wrote: me wrote: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...tId=b logDest Ha, an array of cell phone camera sensors. Ha! Focal-Plane-Shutter Distortions from a DSLR! It's always so obvious when you see an image like this exactly what kind of bad camera design has captured it. http://sitelife.aviationweek.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/15/0/8f56b27b-79ad-4022-a038-2cb624d0256a.Full.jpg I just love these examples. Gotta love those amazingly bad camera designs from last century that turn any fast moving object into distorted rubber. Even funnier, blind DSLR worshippers insist this never happens. I guess they don't take many photographs then! HA! Thanks for the page link! This is another good one to show everyone the misleading, inaccurate, and totally lame images created by any DSLR. Even a cell-phone camera couldn't destroy an image this badly. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ARGUS - DARPA's All-Seeing Eye
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:09:49 -0600, D.J.
wrote: On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:17:17 -0800, Paul Furman wrote: me wrote: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...tId=b logDest Ha, an array of cell phone camera sensors. Ha! Focal-Plane-Shutter Distortions from a DSLR! It's always so obvious when you see an image like this exactly what kind of bad camera design has captured it. http://sitelife.aviationweek.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/15/0/8f56b27b-79ad-4022-a038-2cb624d0256a.Full.jpg I just love these examples. Gotta love those amazingly bad camera designs from last century that turn any fast moving object into distorted rubber. Even funnier, blind DSLR worshippers insist this never happens. I guess they don't take many photographs then! HA! Thanks for the page link! This is another good one to show everyone the misleading, inaccurate, and totally lame images created by any DSLR. Even a cell-phone camera couldn't destroy an image this badly. Actually, you have got it all wrong. The problem you refer to does not occur as a result of the use of a mirror system but as a result of the use of a focal plane shutter. Mirrors don't force the use of focal plane shutters but interchangeable lenses almost certainly do. Sure, interchangeable lens cameras have been built without focal plane shutters but are you really advocating one shutter per lens? Sure, you can get away with that if your camera has a non-interchangeable lens but then, in today's market, that forces you to put up with all the optical problems of a super-zoom. Don't bother responding. It will only be bull**** anyway. Eric Stevens |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ARGUS - DARPA's All-Seeing Eye
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:34:42 +1300, Eric Stevens
wrote: On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:09:49 -0600, D.J. wrote: On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:17:17 -0800, Paul Furman wrote: me wrote: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...tId=b logDest Ha, an array of cell phone camera sensors. Ha! Focal-Plane-Shutter Distortions from a DSLR! It's always so obvious when you see an image like this exactly what kind of bad camera design has captured it. http://sitelife.aviationweek.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/15/0/8f56b27b-79ad-4022-a038-2cb624d0256a.Full.jpg I just love these examples. Gotta love those amazingly bad camera designs from last century that turn any fast moving object into distorted rubber. Even funnier, blind DSLR worshippers insist this never happens. I guess they don't take many photographs then! HA! Thanks for the page link! This is another good one to show everyone the misleading, inaccurate, and totally lame images created by any DSLR. Even a cell-phone camera couldn't destroy an image this badly. Actually, you have got it all wrong. Actually you need to learn to read. I emphasized FOCAL-PLANE-SHUTTER distortions in the very first line of my comment. Just because all DSLR's are crippled with that inefficient, image shaking, obnoxious noise-making, image distorting, and slow-sync flash+shutter limiting design isn't my fault. That's your fault for buying and supporting that antiquated crap. Can't you even read and comprehend what you are trying to add your useless DSLR-Trolls' comments to? The problem you refer to does not occur as a result of the use of a mirror system but as a result of the use of a focal plane shutter. Mirrors don't force the use of focal plane shutters but interchangeable lenses almost certainly do. Sure, interchangeable lens cameras have been built without focal plane shutters but are you really advocating one shutter per lens? Sure, you can get away with that if your camera has a non-interchangeable lens but then, in today's market, that forces you to put up with all the optical problems of a super-zoom. Yes, let's not do that. When everyone already knows that a superzoom 20x P&S lens already beats the resolution and CA performance of an even easier to design 3x DSLR zoom lens. http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Ca..._results.shtml Nobody in their right mind wants a camera lens of 6.7X the range of a DSLR lens with far greater image superiority for 1/10th the price it would cost to attain the same zoom range and even less aperture on the DSLR, with no guarantee the images would even be equal or better. No focal-plane-shutter distortions. Real-time shutter-speed previews, etc. Especially on a camera where the shutter can sync with flash perfectly up to 1/40,000 of a second true shutter speed. They'd be out of their minds! Well, except for those that don't have their heads shoved up their DSLR-worshipping asses so deep that they're still hoping for a miracle to happen on their last-century DSLR designs. Don't bother responding. It will only be bull**** anyway. See, that's the nice thing about being an independent thinker and never following the advice of someone who knows less than I do. I get to do what I want, and discover innovations that blow away anything that the lost followers do, all the while they are insisting that everyone else must do as they do. Lest they all be proved wrong and shown to be the total idiots and fools that they really are. The only bull**** around here is you and the rest of the useless DSLR-Troll, role-play, snapshooters without a clue. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ARGUS - DARPA's All-Seeing Eye
Cletus wrote:
Iwrote: me wrote: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs...tId=b logDest Ha, an array of cell phone camera sensors. Ha! Focal-Plane-Shutter Distortions from a DSLR! So much for serious discussion after the initial thread hit the tank. sigh helicopter photographers notwithstanding... Anyways I think it's brilliant that they used cell phone sensors. In fact you could use 100 cell phones, pull the sensors out and add some extension wires and have each ring up the ground base for basically the same live streaming gigapixel aerial video. Pretty cool. They do note that it's only for daylight use. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ARGUS - DARPA's All-Seeing Eye | me[_5_] | Digital Photography | 32 | February 17th 10 08:13 PM |
FA: Argus C3 35mm | lampbay | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | October 8th 04 09:19 PM |
Argus C-44 | Michael Weinstein | Other Photographic Equipment | 1 | April 15th 04 05:15 AM |
argus holiday dual | Ted | Other Photographic Equipment | 3 | October 30th 03 03:50 AM |
Argus C3 Collectors | Jerry Dycus | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | September 9th 03 12:30 PM |