If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
Hi there,
I just shot a roll of portra 160VC and had it developed at local 1 hr photo lab. The outcome is kind of orange. Can you judge by this is the film out of date or the lab didn't do a good job? Thank you! L. Jou |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
On 2-Feb-2004, "L. Jou" wrote: I just shot a roll of portra 160VC and had it developed at local 1 hr photo lab. The outcome is kind of orange. Can you judge by this is the film out of date or the lab didn't do a good job? Thank you! I assume you are looking at the prints. Evaluating a film by the prints from a one-hour lab is about like choosing a Governor by the quality of his Movies. My guess is you shot the film indoors without a flash or color correction filter. Other possibilities include poor exposure and poor printing by the lab. If the film was way out-of-date (like many years) or had been stored on top of the oven it's possible that the color shifted. I think it's pretty unlikely you'd get a shift that you could detect without direct comparison to a fresh roll. -- Tom Thackrey www.creative-light.com tom (at) creative (dash) light (dot) com do NOT send email to (it's reserved for spammers) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
"Tom Thackrey" wrote in message om... I assume you are looking at the prints. Evaluating a film by the prints from yes a one-hour lab is about like choosing a Governor by the quality of his Movies. My guess is you shot the film indoors without a flash or color no. it's all outdoor and I suppose nikon L37c is a skylight filter. correction filter. Other possibilities include poor exposure and poor printing by the lab. If the film was way out-of-date (like many years) or Well, they used to do well on my portra 800 and 160NC. This time I ask for a custom print, not machine quality print. Does this matter? had been stored on top of the oven it's possible that the color shifted. I think it's pretty unlikely you'd get a shift that you could detect without direct comparison to a fresh roll. -- Tom Thackrey www.creative-light.com tom (at) creative (dash) light (dot) com do NOT send email to (it's reserved for spammers) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
"L. Jou" wrote in message ... Well, they used to do well on my portra 800 and 160NC. This time I ask for a custom print, not machine quality print. Does this matter? If their custom print looks like that, then you should take those custom prints back to the lab and ask for either 1. Your money back. or 2. New prints. Portra 160 VC should not be all orangey and especially under daylight conditions. I don't think you can find a roll of Portra old enough to have this much color shift unless it was stored in the back window of a car in the tropics. Your story is one of the many that makes me feel justified in processing and recommending processing one's own films. C-41 in my opinion is less difficult than B&W, as there no variances you need to (or should) make. If you can hold a film drum at temp for B&W, then you can for C-41. __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
Jim Phelps wrote:
"L. Jou" wrote in message ... Well, they used to do well on my portra 800 and 160NC. This time I ask for a custom print, not machine quality print. Does this matter? If their custom print looks like that, then you should take those custom prints back to the lab and ask for either 1. Your money back. or 2. New prints. Portra 160 VC should not be all orangey and especially under daylight conditions. I don't think you can find a roll of Portra old enough to have this much color shift unless it was stored in the back window of a car in the tropics. Your story is one of the many that makes me feel justified in processing and recommending processing one's own films. C-41 in my opinion is less difficult than B&W, as there no variances you need to (or should) make. If you can hold a film drum at temp for B&W, then you can for C-41. Except C-41 needs a much higher temperature, indoors 68F is probably not too hard to keep, but C-41 needs 90F which can be tricky if your dark room is 68F. There are solutions though, like a warming tray, you either add hot water when the temp drops a little, or get an aquarium heater capable of 90F then add an aquarium pump, to recirculate the water in the warming tray...... What I used to do, was warm it up to hot, then let the temperature drop through 90F until it was the same temperature too cool. For example start at 100F and end up at 80F. Worked well, and never had a problem. W |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
Many one hour labs have problems with printing accurate colors for so-called
"professional" films. Take the negatives back to the lab with an example of a properly printed image. Accept the possibiltiy that this particular job may not be able to handle the job, even if they say they can. Rick In article , says... Hi there, I just shot a roll of portra 160VC and had it developed at local 1 hr photo lab. The outcome is kind of orange. Can you judge by this is the film out of date or the lab didn't do a good job? Thank you! L. Jou |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
Thanks for all the reply.
Well, I took the negative to the lab again for reprint of two of the pictures and the outcome is a little bit better. Then I had another kodak lab do the same reprint. The result is somewhat different, not that orange (I might be misleading, the first prints I got was just a little bit orange). So well...... . I also checked kodak's website and it said that portra 160VC is for use in controlled lighting. Is this the reason for what happened? Thank you! L. Jou |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
"L. Jou" wrote in message ... Thanks for all the reply. Well, I took the negative to the lab again for reprint of two of the pictures and the outcome is a little bit better. Then I had another kodak lab do the same reprint. The result is somewhat different, not that orange (I might be misleading, the first prints I got was just a little bit orange). So well...... . I also checked kodak's website and it said that portra 160VC is for use in controlled lighting. Is this the reason for what happened? Thank you! L. Jou I use Portra in almost all it's flavor (160/400, NC/VC/UC) in all types of lighting (available/flash/sunlight). I process it myself. I never have color shifts I can't filter out. A custom printer would be able to do the same. In fact, most of my print under similar lighting conditions use almost the same filter pack while enlarging. Either the film was processed incorrectly (and the many variables that could happen then) or someone is not doing their job and printing the image correctly. Is there a way for you to scan and post the image for us to see? Jim __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
Because VC stand for Vivid Contrast, the emulsion has more contrast. In
high contrast situations you may get results a little hard to control until you understand how you camera exposes and what you're looking for. Having said that, even with the high contrast all C41 films these days have ample exposure lattitude on the high side. Rate the film at 100, be safe. Controlled lighting means any lighting you want to use, so long as you get used to how the film will handle it. Set a result exposure index depending on how your equipment meters. Find a good consistent lab. Rick In article , says... Thanks for all the reply. Well, I took the negative to the lab again for reprint of two of the pictures and the outcome is a little bit better. Then I had another kodak lab do the same reprint. The result is somewhat different, not that orange (I might be misleading, the first prints I got was just a little bit orange). So well...... . I also checked kodak's website and it said that portra 160VC is for use in controlled lighting. Is this the reason for what happened? Thank you! L. Jou |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
portra 160VC
Well, I post 3 pictures to this newsgroup yesterday but it never shows up.
Anyway, I think I might need to try other labs for a comparison. Is kodak prepaid mailer doing a good job processing portra films and what about A&I? Thank you! L. Jou "Jim Phelps" wrote in message ... I use Portra in almost all it's flavor (160/400, NC/VC/UC) in all types of lighting (available/flash/sunlight). I process it myself. I never have color shifts I can't filter out. A custom printer would be able to do the same. In fact, most of my print under similar lighting conditions use almost the same filter pack while enlarging. Either the film was processed incorrectly (and the many variables that could happen then) or someone is not doing their job and printing the image correctly. Is there a way for you to scan and post the image for us to see? Jim |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
kodak supra | L. Jou | Film & Labs | 10 | January 5th 04 07:27 AM |
Portra 100T - contast ? | fgphotog | Film & Labs | 5 | October 25th 03 04:30 AM |
Filters, Resin vs. Ployester, and Portra Films, for Copying Slides | Dan Wenz | Film & Labs | 1 | October 23rd 03 08:02 PM |
are Kodak 160VC and 400VC a good choice? | Carlo | Film & Labs | 5 | October 21st 03 04:55 AM |
Tungsten - Portra 100T or NPL160? | fgphotog | Film & Labs | 0 | October 20th 03 03:26 AM |