If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1111
|
|||
|
|||
"Skip M" wrote in message
news:QJKud.1907$2r.1590@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... "Skip M" wrote in message news:xQqud.622$2r.171@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... "Skip M" wrote in message news:Wypud.604$2r.560@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... "Skip M" wrote in message news:7fpud.603$2r.527@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... Who gives a dam what you do? Film is better no matter how hard some people try not to accept it! me It looks like you're getting a little desperate to not accept the idea that digital has caught up with film, in fact did so some time ago, and in some cases, surpasses it. That is the mantra of digital dullards in every NG. Film; do I have to say it? me I'll tell you what, show me some of your work. And look at mine and tell me which is digital and which is film. And not on my website. I'll you prints. As long as you mail me some, too. Like I said, I shoot both. If you don't like digital, what are you doing posting to the digital NG? Take yourself out of the conversation, and be secure in your own little world. Photography rules, no matter how you do it... I posted in rec.photo.equipment.35mm, a photography NG about film cameras. I guess your, in that special ed NG for digital dullards. :-) Film; I won't say it because Skippy gets upset :-( me I haven't noticed you posting much of use over here, either... Work on those reading skills. You appear to be having trouble making up your mind, a minute ago you said you were done with me. Still don't want to compare images? I'm waiting... You *ass*ume incorrectly that I feel a need to prove something to you, I do not. You have a need to prove something to me, which you can not. Film, rules You're the one with the contention that film is superior to digital, not me. I have nothing to prove. I just want to see if you can produce any images of note. So far, you haven't. And I still haven't seen anything useful from you. Skippy! I thought you were done with me? Let me break this down so even you can understand. I don't contend film is better than digital I *know* film is better than digital. But why do you *ass*ume that I would be foolish enough to attempt to prove it to you or any other digital dullard? I can't think of anything that would be more fruitless. I hope this clears up your confusion on this point because if it doesn't I just don't know how I can make it any simpler. Film, Skippy please try not to let it bother you so much! ;-) me |
#1112
|
|||
|
|||
"Skip M" wrote in message
news:QJKud.1907$2r.1590@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... "Skip M" wrote in message news:xQqud.622$2r.171@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... "Skip M" wrote in message news:Wypud.604$2r.560@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... "Skip M" wrote in message news:7fpud.603$2r.527@fed1read02... "me" wrote in message ... Who gives a dam what you do? Film is better no matter how hard some people try not to accept it! me It looks like you're getting a little desperate to not accept the idea that digital has caught up with film, in fact did so some time ago, and in some cases, surpasses it. That is the mantra of digital dullards in every NG. Film; do I have to say it? me I'll tell you what, show me some of your work. And look at mine and tell me which is digital and which is film. And not on my website. I'll you prints. As long as you mail me some, too. Like I said, I shoot both. If you don't like digital, what are you doing posting to the digital NG? Take yourself out of the conversation, and be secure in your own little world. Photography rules, no matter how you do it... I posted in rec.photo.equipment.35mm, a photography NG about film cameras. I guess your, in that special ed NG for digital dullards. :-) Film; I won't say it because Skippy gets upset :-( me I haven't noticed you posting much of use over here, either... Work on those reading skills. You appear to be having trouble making up your mind, a minute ago you said you were done with me. Still don't want to compare images? I'm waiting... You *ass*ume incorrectly that I feel a need to prove something to you, I do not. You have a need to prove something to me, which you can not. Film, rules You're the one with the contention that film is superior to digital, not me. I have nothing to prove. I just want to see if you can produce any images of note. So far, you haven't. And I still haven't seen anything useful from you. Skippy! I thought you were done with me? Let me break this down so even you can understand. I don't contend film is better than digital I *know* film is better than digital. But why do you *ass*ume that I would be foolish enough to attempt to prove it to you or any other digital dullard? I can't think of anything that would be more fruitless. I hope this clears up your confusion on this point because if it doesn't I just don't know how I can make it any simpler. Film, Skippy please try not to let it bother you so much! ;-) me |
#1113
|
|||
|
|||
me wrote:
Your lack of respect for me is truly gratifying. Thank You, me Ah deep Joy! He still doesn't get it, but then he never will. Had he had the intelligence to discuss things rationally he might have got somewhere in the world. He'll probably think up some witty epithet like "F**K OFF" in order to get the last word. Never mind the child is welcome to it. Mind you we obviously hit the target didn't we! Be careful of the school bullies on Monday. Bye Bye. "Never mind the medium - just look at the pictures." - me would never have the intelligence to think of that. |
#1114
|
|||
|
|||
me wrote:
Your lack of respect for me is truly gratifying. Thank You, me Ah deep Joy! He still doesn't get it, but then he never will. Had he had the intelligence to discuss things rationally he might have got somewhere in the world. He'll probably think up some witty epithet like "F**K OFF" in order to get the last word. Never mind the child is welcome to it. Mind you we obviously hit the target didn't we! Be careful of the school bullies on Monday. Bye Bye. "Never mind the medium - just look at the pictures." - me would never have the intelligence to think of that. |
#1115
|
|||
|
|||
me posted:
wrote in message oups.com... And all of those photog's (I know several of them, even though I don't claim to be one myself) Agreed. are leaving it up to you to fight the 'good fight'. None of them are chiming in. (I think we can discount 'me' and 'teflon' as very genuine trolls with nary a reference or coherent thought so far.) **** you, me Let's guess... That's just me being mature? -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#1116
|
|||
|
|||
me posted:
wrote in message oups.com... And all of those photog's (I know several of them, even though I don't claim to be one myself) Agreed. are leaving it up to you to fight the 'good fight'. None of them are chiming in. (I think we can discount 'me' and 'teflon' as very genuine trolls with nary a reference or coherent thought so far.) **** you, me Let's guess... That's just me being mature? -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
#1118
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in
: Jon Pike writes: wrote in : You're entirely missing the point. What all the digital supporters seem to be saying is that, although they have no real basis for it, they -think- that all the important information is being captured. And what you're saying is that, although you have no real basis for it, you -think- that important information is being lost. No, I've seen results of tests No, no, no, Jon! No fair using the plural here! Yes, perfectly fair. He tested several things, so there were several tests done. saying that there is a 10% measured loss of resolution when film gets scanned. That, to me, is important. Because it reinforces the opinion you already had. No, because I don't throw away 10% of my equipment's abilities on a whim. -- http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet |
#1119
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in
: Jon Pike writes: "Harvey" wrote in news:u7sud.1040$Sr1.558 @newsfe6-win.ntli.net: I thought throughout this thread you'd been trying to say the that film outperforms digital? Are you incapable of doing simple math? Tell me, what do you think the percent difference from 88 to 79 is? Which number is higher, 55 or 88? There you go again. You figure the only number you can find that favors film is really the only number needed to describe image quality. YOu're either not listening, or you're blatently trolling. We're not discussing "image quality." We're discussing "theoretical equivalent resolution." So yes, the only number I'll be paying attention to in this discussion, is a number that pertains to resolution. Ah, by the way Jon, didn't you claim that most film was capable of 100 or 200 cycles/mm? Nope. -- http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet |
#1120
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in
: Jon Pike writes: "Harvey" wrote in news:u7sud.1040$Sr1.558 @newsfe6-win.ntli.net: I thought throughout this thread you'd been trying to say the that film outperforms digital? Are you incapable of doing simple math? Tell me, what do you think the percent difference from 88 to 79 is? Which number is higher, 55 or 88? There you go again. You figure the only number you can find that favors film is really the only number needed to describe image quality. YOu're either not listening, or you're blatently trolling. We're not discussing "image quality." We're discussing "theoretical equivalent resolution." So yes, the only number I'll be paying attention to in this discussion, is a number that pertains to resolution. Ah, by the way Jon, didn't you claim that most film was capable of 100 or 200 cycles/mm? Nope. -- http://www.neopets.com/refer.phtml?username=moosespet |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I need to transfer my digital files to 35mm slides and negatives output and other film format outputs? | Chris | Digital Photography | 5 | September 25th 04 07:43 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 274 | July 30th 04 12:26 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | Digital Photography | 213 | July 28th 04 06:30 PM |
Will digital photography ever stabilize? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 37 | June 30th 04 08:11 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 10:51 PM |