If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
Very interesting...
https://interestingengineering.com/the-worlds-fastest-10-trillion-fps-camera-is-here-and-it-can-freeze-time?_source=newsletter&_campaign=BznyaKrM7be5V&_u id=nXe0N3Xbxr&_h=64cc3b5d9718727b8670189a16e07bec6 29326aa&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=mailing&u tm_campaign=Newsletter-13-10-2018 -- best regards, Neil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
On Oct 15, 2018, Neil wrote
(in article ): Very interesting... https://interestingengineering.com/t...on-fps-camera- is-here-and-it-can-freeze-time?_source=newsletter&_campaign=BznyaKrM7be5V&_u id =nXe0N3Xbxr&_h=64cc3b5d9718727b8670189a16e07bec629 326aa&utm_source=newsletter& utm_medium=mailing&utm_campaign=Newsletter-13-10-2018 Interesting indeed. However, not to be found in your everyday Nikon, Canon, Olympus, or Fujifilm anytime soon. If they do they should be able to shoot a 100 meter track event and take a week, or more to analyze each movement/moment for those 10 seconds. ;-) Do you think they might have a rolling shutter issue? Hell! I have a hard enough time trying to use 30fps, and at an airshow with low level, high speed passes I find that a 3 to 5 frame burst, with the occasional 8 frame burst is all I need. You have to control that trigger finger. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
In article , Neil
wrote: Very interesting... https://interestingengineering.com/t...on-fps-camera- is-here-and-it-can-freeze-time?_source=newsletter&_campaign=BznyaKrM7be5V&_u id =nXe0N3Xbxr&_h=64cc3b5d9718727b8670189a16e07bec629 326aa&utm_source=newsletter& utm_medium=mailing&utm_campaign=Newsletter-13-10-2018 most of that is tracking information. what else did the newsletter say? all that's needed is this: https://interestingengineering.com/t...trillion-fps-c amera-is-here-and-it-can-freeze-time |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
On 10/15/2018 11:08 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 15, 2018, Neil wrote (in article ): Very interesting... https://interestingengineering.com/t...on-fps-camera- is-here-and-it-can-freeze-time?_source=newsletter&_campaign=BznyaKrM7be5V&_u id =nXe0N3Xbxr&_h=64cc3b5d9718727b8670189a16e07bec629 326aa&utm_source=newsletter& utm_medium=mailing&utm_campaign=Newsletter-13-10-2018 Interesting indeed. However, not to be found in your everyday Nikon, Canon, Olympus, or Fujifilm anytime soon. If they do they should be able to shoot a 100 meter track event and take a week, or more to analyze each movement/moment for those 10 seconds. ;-) Do you think they might have a rolling shutter issue? Hell! I have a hard enough time trying to use 30fps, and at an airshow with low level, high speed passes I find that a 3 to 5 frame burst, with the occasional 8 frame burst is all I need. You have to control that trigger finger. It will breath new life into LR, and one event will take an entire life's work to select the best shots! ;-) Seriously, I suspect that we'll see some significant boost in capture rates for upscale cameras in the not-so-distant future. As for 30fps, those who have shot video have always worked with that rate, and it's not much of a challenge. IMO, the issue is that it isn't the best way to get individual shots anyway, but for those who work that way, a 120fps rate would improve their chances. -- best regards, Neil |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
In article , Neil
wrote: Seriously, I suspect that we'll see some significant boost in capture rates for upscale cameras in the not-so-distant future. As for 30fps, those who have shot video have always worked with that rate, and it's not much of a challenge. IMO, the issue is that it isn't the best way to get individual shots anyway, but for those who work that way, a 120fps rate would improve their chances. 60 and 120fps and even 240fps is the norm now. the problem is storage. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
On Oct 15, 2018, Neil wrote
(in article ): On 10/15/2018 11:08 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 15, 2018, Neil wrote (in article ): Very interesting... https://interestingengineering.com/t...llion-fps-came ra- is-here-and-it-can-freeze-time?_source=newsletter&_campaign=BznyaKrM7be5V&_ uid =nXe0N3Xbxr&_h=64cc3b5d9718727b8670189a16e07bec629 326aa&utm_source=newslett er& utm_medium=mailing&utm_campaign=Newsletter-13-10-2018 Interesting indeed. However, not to be found in your everyday Nikon, Canon, Olympus, or Fujifilm anytime soon. If they do they should be able to shoot a 100 meter track event and take a week, or more to analyze each movement/moment for those 10 seconds. ;-) Do you think they might have a rolling shutter issue? Hell! I have a hard enough time trying to use 30fps, and at an airshow with low level, high speed passes I find that a 3 to 5 frame burst, with the occasional 8 frame burst is all I need. You have to control that trigger finger. It will breath new life into LR, and one event will take an entire life's work to select the best shots! ;-) I have my head stuck in LR with selecting single frames, and finding that “shot” in any of my occasional bursts. I certainly can’t imagine analyzing the content of a second or two from a 10 trillion fps sequence. Seriously, I suspect that we'll see some significant boost in capture rates for upscale cameras in the not-so-distant future. As for 30fps, those who have shot video have always worked with that rate, and it's not much of a challenge. IMO, the issue is that it isn't the best way to get individual shots anyway, but for those who work that way, a 120fps rate would improve their chances. Well I can shoot 120fps video with my X-T3, not that I am a video shooter, but then to dig through that footage to extract that single Pulitzer winning “frame” is going to be a royal PIA. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
On 10/15/2018 12:39 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 15, 2018, Neil wrote (in article ): On 10/15/2018 11:08 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 15, 2018, Neil wrote (in article ): Very interesting... https://interestingengineering.com/t...llion-fps-came ra- is-here-and-it-can-freeze-time?_source=newsletter&_campaign=BznyaKrM7be5V&_ uid =nXe0N3Xbxr&_h=64cc3b5d9718727b8670189a16e07bec629 326aa&utm_source=newslett er& utm_medium=mailing&utm_campaign=Newsletter-13-10-2018 Interesting indeed. However, not to be found in your everyday Nikon, Canon, Olympus, or Fujifilm anytime soon. If they do they should be able to shoot a 100 meter track event and take a week, or more to analyze each movement/moment for those 10 seconds. ;-) Do you think they might have a rolling shutter issue? Hell! I have a hard enough time trying to use 30fps, and at an airshow with low level, high speed passes I find that a 3 to 5 frame burst, with the occasional 8 frame burst is all I need. You have to control that trigger finger. It will breath new life into LR, and one event will take an entire life's work to select the best shots! ;-) I have my head stuck in LR with selecting single frames, and finding that “shot” in any of my occasional bursts. I certainly can’t imagine analyzing the content of a second or two from a 10 trillion fps sequence. That is a down-side to the style of shooting that has become popular. Seriously, I suspect that we'll see some significant boost in capture rates for upscale cameras in the not-so-distant future. As for 30fps, those who have shot video have always worked with that rate, and it's not much of a challenge. IMO, the issue is that it isn't the best way to get individual shots anyway, but for those who work that way, a 120fps rate would improve their chances. Well I can shoot 120fps video with my X-T3, not that I am a video shooter, but then to dig through that footage to extract that single Pulitzer winning “frame” is going to be a royal PIA. My point is that Pulitzer prize shots of action scenes have been taken for many decades with cameras that even lacked motor drives. The reliance on technology while diminishing one's skills is of questionable value as far as I'm concerned. -- best regards, Neil |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
In article , Neil
wrote: My point is that Pulitzer prize shots of action scenes have been taken for many decades with cameras that even lacked motor drives. The reliance on technology while diminishing one's skills is of questionable value as far as I'm concerned. nothing is diminished. technology allows for opportunities that were otherwise not possible and makes what was once possible that much easier. fighting progress is a losing battle. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
On 10/15/2018 12:16 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Neil wrote: Seriously, I suspect that we'll see some significant boost in capture rates for upscale cameras in the not-so-distant future. As for 30fps, those who have shot video have always worked with that rate, and it's not much of a challenge. IMO, the issue is that it isn't the best way to get individual shots anyway, but for those who work that way, a 120fps rate would improve their chances. 60 and 120fps and even 240fps is the norm now. the problem is storage. To quote you, "storage is cheap." I see the issue as on of organization. -- PeterN |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Image capture speed gets a boost!
In article , PeterN
wrote: On 10/15/2018 12:16 PM, nospam wrote: In article , Neil wrote: Seriously, I suspect that we'll see some significant boost in capture rates for upscale cameras in the not-so-distant future. As for 30fps, those who have shot video have always worked with that rate, and it's not much of a challenge. IMO, the issue is that it isn't the best way to get individual shots anyway, but for those who work that way, a 120fps rate would improve their chances. 60 and 120fps and even 240fps is the norm now. the problem is storage. To quote you, "storage is cheap." it is, however, 240fps is still 8x the amount of data as 30fps, so either you shoot 1/8th as much video or you need to pay 8x as much in storage costs. the other problem is the camera itself. 240fps will quickly fill a smartphone or sd card, even if you have petabytes on a nas. I see the issue as on of organization. organization is no different. it's the same videos, just a lot bigger. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High-speed photographs by Lex Augusteijn capture the moment a bullet hits objects | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 2 | August 21st 10 02:56 AM |
Scott Linstead's high-speed photographs capture creatures frozen in time | Russ D | Digital Photography | 11 | July 23rd 10 02:16 PM |
What's the big deal with ISO 3200 Boost? | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 15 | September 9th 06 06:04 AM |
Nikon Capture download speed | claus | Digital Photography | 4 | April 7th 05 05:19 PM |
Nikon Capture download speed | claus | Digital Photography | 0 | April 6th 05 11:54 AM |