If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mojtaba wrote:
Lat night I scanned a film by Minolta DSIII and I got some strane violet color on the scans. What makes this problem and howI can avoid it? An example is put he http://www.pbase.com/image/33427514/large What film was that? In any case your colours are all over the place. I have no idea what the violet is ... was perhaps there a colour lamp there (blue or red?) shining in the fog? Use the Minolta scan s/w with all the scan levels set to neutral values. Adjust your colour in PS after the scan. -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Mojtaba" wrote in message
... On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 12:37:03 GMT, "Matt Clara" wrote: Mojtaba Looks like lens flare from a light source off to the right. This kind of flare is notoriously difficult to control with high intensity lights, and very visible in a night shot. You should have been able to see it in the viewfinder, though it's never as noticeable as in the final print. You need to position your camera very carefully at night because of this, and use a lens hood. I could be wrong, but that's my take. Thank you for respons, The purple color is seen also in photos I have taken days after in total sun shine. Mojtaba Sounds like a light leak then. Perhaps your camera is due for a CLA (clean/lube/adjust) with the light/dust seals replaced? I suppose it could be your processor, too, though it seems unlikely. -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Mojtaba" wrote in message
... On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 12:37:03 GMT, "Matt Clara" wrote: Mojtaba Looks like lens flare from a light source off to the right. This kind of flare is notoriously difficult to control with high intensity lights, and very visible in a night shot. You should have been able to see it in the viewfinder, though it's never as noticeable as in the final print. You need to position your camera very carefully at night because of this, and use a lens hood. I could be wrong, but that's my take. Thank you for respons, The purple color is seen also in photos I have taken days after in total sun shine. Mojtaba Sounds like a light leak then. Perhaps your camera is due for a CLA (clean/lube/adjust) with the light/dust seals replaced? I suppose it could be your processor, too, though it seems unlikely. -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Clara" wrote in message
... "Mojtaba" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 12:37:03 GMT, "Matt Clara" wrote: Mojtaba Looks like lens flare from a light source off to the right. This kind of flare is notoriously difficult to control with high intensity lights, and very visible in a night shot. You should have been able to see it in the viewfinder, though it's never as noticeable as in the final print. You need to position your camera very carefully at night because of this, and use a lens hood. I could be wrong, but that's my take. Thank you for respons, The purple color is seen also in photos I have taken days after in total sun shine. Mojtaba Sounds like a light leak then. Perhaps your camera is due for a CLA (clean/lube/adjust) with the light/dust seals replaced? I suppose it could be your processor, too, though it seems unlikely. Wait, I'm overlooking your scanner, which raises the question, is this light area not on the negative (where it would look like a dark area)? In any case, light is being admitted somewhere down the line. The color of it is most likely inconsequential. If it's your camera, then new seals are in order, if it's your scanner, then it's a trip to the fix it shop. Examine the negatives closely with a loop, or a 50mm lens turned on end, or magnifying glass. If the light's in the negative, then it's the camera, and vice-versa. -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Clara" wrote in message
... "Mojtaba" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 12:37:03 GMT, "Matt Clara" wrote: Mojtaba Looks like lens flare from a light source off to the right. This kind of flare is notoriously difficult to control with high intensity lights, and very visible in a night shot. You should have been able to see it in the viewfinder, though it's never as noticeable as in the final print. You need to position your camera very carefully at night because of this, and use a lens hood. I could be wrong, but that's my take. Thank you for respons, The purple color is seen also in photos I have taken days after in total sun shine. Mojtaba Sounds like a light leak then. Perhaps your camera is due for a CLA (clean/lube/adjust) with the light/dust seals replaced? I suppose it could be your processor, too, though it seems unlikely. Wait, I'm overlooking your scanner, which raises the question, is this light area not on the negative (where it would look like a dark area)? In any case, light is being admitted somewhere down the line. The color of it is most likely inconsequential. If it's your camera, then new seals are in order, if it's your scanner, then it's a trip to the fix it shop. Examine the negatives closely with a loop, or a 50mm lens turned on end, or magnifying glass. If the light's in the negative, then it's the camera, and vice-versa. -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Clara" wrote in message
... "Mojtaba" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 12:37:03 GMT, "Matt Clara" wrote: Mojtaba Looks like lens flare from a light source off to the right. This kind of flare is notoriously difficult to control with high intensity lights, and very visible in a night shot. You should have been able to see it in the viewfinder, though it's never as noticeable as in the final print. You need to position your camera very carefully at night because of this, and use a lens hood. I could be wrong, but that's my take. Thank you for respons, The purple color is seen also in photos I have taken days after in total sun shine. Mojtaba Sounds like a light leak then. Perhaps your camera is due for a CLA (clean/lube/adjust) with the light/dust seals replaced? I suppose it could be your processor, too, though it seems unlikely. Wait, I'm overlooking your scanner, which raises the question, is this light area not on the negative (where it would look like a dark area)? In any case, light is being admitted somewhere down the line. The color of it is most likely inconsequential. If it's your camera, then new seals are in order, if it's your scanner, then it's a trip to the fix it shop. Examine the negatives closely with a loop, or a 50mm lens turned on end, or magnifying glass. If the light's in the negative, then it's the camera, and vice-versa. -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Mojtaba wrote:
Lat night I scanned a film by Minolta DSIII and I got some strane violet color on the scans. What makes this problem and howI can avoid it? An example is put he http://www.pbase.com/image/33427514/large Thnks, Mojtaba Please clarify whether the blue/violet patch in your scan is on the negative/slide, or whether it was put there by the scanner. Your post seems to imply that the scanner produced the patch, but we need to know before we can help further. Colin D. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Mojtaba wrote:
Lat night I scanned a film by Minolta DSIII and I got some strane violet color on the scans. What makes this problem and howI can avoid it? An example is put he http://www.pbase.com/image/33427514/large Thnks, Mojtaba Please clarify whether the blue/violet patch in your scan is on the negative/slide, or whether it was put there by the scanner. Your post seems to imply that the scanner produced the patch, but we need to know before we can help further. Colin D. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Mojtaba wrote:
Lat night I scanned a film by Minolta DSIII and I got some strane violet color on the scans. What makes this problem and howI can avoid it? An example is put he http://www.pbase.com/image/33427514/large Thnks, Mojtaba Please clarify whether the blue/violet patch in your scan is on the negative/slide, or whether it was put there by the scanner. Your post seems to imply that the scanner produced the patch, but we need to know before we can help further. Colin D. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:23:07 GMT, "Matt Clara"
wrote: Sounds like a light leak then. Perhaps your camera is due for a CLA (clean/lube/adjust) with the light/dust seals replaced? The camera is very old so theoretically it is possible but the purple color is only seen on the scans and not on the negative. I supose this weaken the camera failure possibility. I suppose it could be your processor, too, though it seems unlikely. What do you mean? My computer's processor? Mojtaba |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to put the border around a headshot? | Millenium | Photographing People | 38 | December 22nd 18 12:26 PM |
Dots per inch question | Phil Stripling | Digital Photography | 13 | August 19th 04 04:00 PM |
single bath sodium sulfide toner? | sreenath | In The Darkroom | 22 | August 13th 04 12:31 PM |
Image intensifiers | Richard Knoppow | In The Darkroom | 8 | July 31st 04 04:38 AM |
[SI] XXXI Critique | street shooter | 35mm Photo Equipment | 18 | July 5th 04 04:04 PM |