If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
On Apr 20, 2018, David_B wrote
(in article ): On 20-Apr-18 9:25 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Apr 20, 2018, David_B wrote (in article ): On 17-Apr-18 11:39 AM, David_B wrote: A pioneering fingerprint technique used to convict a drugs gang from a WhatsApp message "is the future" of how police approach evidence to catch criminals. An image of a man holding ecstasy tablets in his palm was found on the mobile of someone arrested in Bridgend. It was sent to South Wales Police's scientific support unit and helped to secure 11 convictions. These are believed to be the first convictions in Wales from fingerprints taken from a photograph. The unit's Dave Thomas described its use as "groundbreaking" and said officers are now looking more closely at photographs on phones seized for potential evidence. 'Ecstasy pills for sale' in WhatsApp message Teens found selling drugs on Snapchat and Instagram How drugs are offered on Instagram He said: "It is an old-fashioned technique [fingerprinting], not new. "Ultimately, beyond everything else, we took a phone and looked at everything on it - we knew it had a hand with drugs on it. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-43711477 Did ANYONE watch this video? Yes. I'm pleased. :-) This is 'cutting edge' photography and interpretation! No. It was just another way to obtain a partial fingerprint, and to confirm the identity of a subject. Fingerprint ID in forensics has been viable concept since 1853. Charles Darwin’s cousin, Sir Francis Galton studied the use of unique fingerprints for identification in the 1880’s. In 1891 an Argentine police official, Juan Vucetich created the first police fingerprint files. In Buenos Aires in 1892 a Vucetich trainee, Inspector Eduado Alvarez made the first criminal identification from a latent print at a crime scene. The fingerprint branch at New Scotland Yard was established in 1901. The New York Service Commission, The NY State Prison system, and Leavenworth Federal Penitentary started using fingerprints in 1903. The US Army starts using fingerprints for ID, and the US Department of Justice forms the Bureau of Criminal Identification, to create a centralized reference collection of fingerprint cards in 1905. There was yet to be an FBI. In 1910 Fredrick Brayley published the first American text book on fingerprints; “Arrangement of Fingerprints, Identification, and Their Uses.” Things have moved on since then with current advanced technology, so no, what was used in that case was not ‘cutting edge’, just an opportunistic windfall of evidence. I appreciate your response and for the historical insights. I personally believe that few criminals would have imagined that the police could have identified someone from an online photograph of a hand! The police already knew who their target subject was, the photograph of his hand with the partial print was just another piece of evidence leading to the conviction. As for the stupidity of providing the gift of that photograph to the police, the dealer was complacent, arrogant, and stupid. Think Dunning-Kruger Effect. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
On Apr 20, 2018, David_B wrote
(in article ): On 20-Apr-18 10:43 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Apr 20, 2018, David_B wrote (in article ): On 20-Apr-18 9:25 PM, Savageduck wrote: Superfluous stuff snipped Things have moved on since then with current advanced technology, so no, what was used in that case was not ‘cutting edge’, just an opportunistic windfall of evidence. I appreciate your response and for the historical insights. I personally believe that few criminals would have imagined that the police could have identified someone from an online photograph of a hand! The police already knew who their target subject was, the photograph of his hand with the partial print was just another piece of evidence leading to the conviction. Agreed. As for the stupidity of providing the gift of that photograph to the police, the dealer was complacent, arrogant, and stupid. Think Dunning-Kruger Effect. Rather like Dus... ....and you just couldn’t resist degrading this thread into a TROLL for your personal vendetta. I believe we have said all there is to say in this thread, and there is no need to take it further. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
Savageduck
news.com Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:25:49 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On Apr 20, 2018, David_B wrote (in article ): On 17-Apr-18 11:39 AM, David_B wrote: A pioneering fingerprint technique used to convict a drugs gang from a WhatsApp message "is the future" of how police approach evidence to catch criminals. An image of a man holding ecstasy tablets in his palm was found on the mobile of someone arrested in Bridgend. It was sent to South Wales Police's scientific support unit and helped to secure 11 convictions. These are believed to be the first convictions in Wales from fingerprints taken from a photograph. The unit's Dave Thomas described its use as "groundbreaking" and said officers are now looking more closely at photographs on phones seized for potential evidence. 'Ecstasy pills for sale' in WhatsApp message Teens found selling drugs on Snapchat and Instagram How drugs are offered on Instagram He said: "It is an old-fashioned technique [fingerprinting], not new. "Ultimately, beyond everything else, we took a phone and looked at everything on it - we knew it had a hand with drugs on it. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-43711477 Did ANYONE watch this video? Yes. This is 'cutting edge' photography and interpretation! No. It was just another way to obtain a partial fingerprint, and to confirm the identity of a subject. Fingerprint ID in forensics has been viable concept since 1853. Charles Darwin’s cousin, Sir Francis Galton studied the use of unique fingerprints for identification in the 1880’s. It's pseudo science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM1QgwaKv4s -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = Variables won't; constants aren't. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
David_B
Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:01:16 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On 20-Apr-18 9:25 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Apr 20, 2018, David_B wrote (in article ): On 17-Apr-18 11:39 AM, David_B wrote: A pioneering fingerprint technique used to convict a drugs gang from a WhatsApp message "is the future" of how police approach evidence to catch criminals. An image of a man holding ecstasy tablets in his palm was found on the mobile of someone arrested in Bridgend. It was sent to South Wales Police's scientific support unit and helped to secure 11 convictions. These are believed to be the first convictions in Wales from fingerprints taken from a photograph. The unit's Dave Thomas described its use as "groundbreaking" and said officers are now looking more closely at photographs on phones seized for potential evidence. 'Ecstasy pills for sale' in WhatsApp message Teens found selling drugs on Snapchat and Instagram How drugs are offered on Instagram He said: "It is an old-fashioned technique [fingerprinting], not new. "Ultimately, beyond everything else, we took a phone and looked at everything on it - we knew it had a hand with drugs on it. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-43711477 Did ANYONE watch this video? Yes. I'm pleased. :-) This is 'cutting edge' photography and interpretation! No. It was just another way to obtain a partial fingerprint, and to confirm the identity of a subject. Fingerprint ID in forensics has been viable concept since 1853. Charles Darwin’s cousin, Sir Francis Galton studied the use of unique fingerprints for identification in the 1880’s. In 1891 an Argentine police official, Juan Vucetich created the first police fingerprint files. In Buenos Aires in 1892 a Vucetich trainee, Inspector Eduado Alvarez made the first criminal identification from a latent print at a crime scene. The fingerprint branch at New Scotland Yard was established in 1901. The New York Service Commission, The NY State Prison system, and Leavenworth Federal Penitentary started using fingerprints in 1903. The US Army starts using fingerprints for ID, and the US Department of Justice forms the Bureau of Criminal Identification, to create a centralized reference collection of fingerprint cards in 1905. There was yet to be an FBI. In 1910 Fredrick Brayley published the first American text book on fingerprints; “Arrangement of Fingerprints, Identification, and Their Uses.” Things have moved on since then with current advanced technology, so no, what was used in that case was not ‘cutting edge’, just an opportunistic windfall of evidence. I appreciate your response and for the historical insights. You probably won't like this rebuttal concerning how reliable fingerprints is, then...: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM1QgwaKv4s Adam ruins everything - forensic science. It's quite educational if you're one of those people who thinks what they see in movies and on TV in relation to crime/crime scene investigation is accurate. For those who already know how unreliable fingerprinting is, you may find that section of the video a bit dull. I personally believe that few criminals would have imagined that the police could have identified someone from an online photograph of a hand! They haven't. It's junk science. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = 'the abyss gazes also into you.' |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
Savageduck
news.com Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:28:41 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On Apr 20, 2018, nospam wrote (in ) : In , David_B wrote: I personally believe that few criminals would have imagined that the police could have identified someone from an online photograph of a hand! it was much more than that. Yup. The police already had a suspect, the partial print just confirmed things. Maybe it confirmed things... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM1QgwaKv4s Fingerprinting isn't reliable science. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = Why doesn't DOS ever say 'Excellent command or filename!' |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
Savageduck
news.com Fri, 20 Apr 2018 22:40:59 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: snip ...and you just couldn’t resist degrading this thread into a TROLL for your personal vendetta. I believe we have said all there is to say in this thread, and there is no need to take it further. Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): , Which is why the warning above is present. It's also why the site in the warning above exists. https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php As things didn't continue going his way, you'll notice he hasn't responded any further in the thread. One would think you would have smartened up a bit quicker by now since he tried to dox you once already. Alas, some people are destined to learn, slowly, if they retain the knowledge they acquired, at all. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = Plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
On 22-Apr-18 9:52 PM, Diesel wrote:
Do you have any proof of that, David? Yes. Here's an example of your illicit work:- https://torrentdownloads.sitescrack....il%29-2013-hhi I sent the video of you in your 'Lab' to the police in Kingsport, TN some weeks ago. HTH -- David B. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
David_B
Sun, 22 Apr 2018 21:49:22 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On 22-Apr-18 9:52 PM, Diesel wrote: Do you have any proof of that, David? Yes. So the proof is where? Here's an example of your illicit work:- https://torrentdownloads.sitescrack....16086/the_band _perry-pioneer-%28retail%29-2013-hhi Your proof that directly ties me to that is? I sent the video of you in your 'Lab' to the police in Kingsport, TN some weeks ago. So you admit then to keeping an unauthorized copy of my copyrighted video? I fail to see how a short video that you attempted to alter and somehow lost the audio track to as a result is evidence of any wrong doing on my part, David. I remind you, the only thing you've demonstrated by the above admission is once again, what I've written about you and your stalking as well as intentional copyright infringing ways is true. I'm sure professional/semi professional photographers love people like you. /sarcasm. After all, I'm not the only one who has material you've retained unauthorized copies of for future unauthorized distribution. And, i'm sure I won't be the last either. Not with all the fresh meat you've found here. Btw, you forgot to answer this question: And, why did you feel it necessary to mention me in this thread? I also couldn't help but notice you didn't comment on anything else I wrote which discussed how we know each other and why things are the way they are between us. Are you concerned that if you did try to lie about it and deny any of it, that I'd post MIDs here for all to see that you were lying? If so, it's a valid concern. I'm not really concerned with proving you're a liar at this point though, David. It's fairly safe to say, that's well known about you now and doesn't require further reminding. You pretty well finalized that for us all when you claimed a specific malware executable file was present on the tekrider site, knowing the entire time, it *never* was. Your issue with the site is the honest warning it provides others about you. Which, by your own actions here, confirm the warning is accurate and should be taken seriously. In case you forgot, David, this is the site which warns others about your kooky and potentially harmful behaviors: To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = I got a gun for my wife. Pretty good trade, huh? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
Whisky-dave
Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:20:23 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On Friday, 20 April 2018 22:01:26 UTC+1, David_B wrote: On 20-Apr-18 9:25 PM, Savageduck wrote: I appreciate your response and for the historical insights. I personally believe that few criminals would have imagined that the police could have identified someone from an online photograph of a hand! Luckily most criminals are pretty stupid, some take selfies with lots of money around them or do youtube videos of themselves doing a ton down the motorway, I guess they were suprised that a photo could be used to read finger prints and related imagary from high resolution cameras. Surely they have heard of those space cameras controlled by the CIA, FBI and the secret services that can pick out a pimple on a pimple on a pigs arse from space. Some even go so far as to upload something that doesn't belong to them to youtube, post the url, and challenge the rightful owner of the video to do something about it. Yes, David IS that kind of stupid. Not only was the video removed from his channel, google also found a copy present on his google drive and removed that too for me. I know this only because he posted complaining (no, really, he did) that google had done that to him. To Davids credit, although he's not the brightest criminal, his gift of gab does allow him to easily phish for new victims and/or assistance in dealing with the ones he already has. So long as he posts to a newsgroup where he wasn't already a regular and isn't 'known' for what he is, just yet. If he's posting to a forum instead, it's likely via a new account he created due to the prior one(s) getting banned for repeat forum rules violations. He believes ban evasion is perfectly okay and he has the right to use/abuse another persons/companies equipment and network resources as he likes. Even if he's already been told he's not welcome there. He comes across as an innocent person, and within a short period of time, exposes his nature. Usually not before BSing one or more regulars of the newsgroup, though. At last count, he got HH, SavageDuck, possibly yourself and another I can't remember the posting nym of. I do believe that when he abused the information he learned from private (email?) correspondence with Savageduck that mrDuck realized, hey, gee, maybe the guys who arrived after David and posted warnings about him were right after all. A little too late in his case though, David has already addressed him by what one can only assume is his first name. Hopefully mr duck didn't get too personal beyond that. If he did, it's only a matter of time before Savageduck says or does something that irks David enough to drop more personal information to bring Savageduck back in 'check' if you will. Alas, some people really are the kind that have to learn the hard way. Hopefully you aren't one of them. If you are, well, don't say I didn't warn you. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = Without Time, everything would happen at once |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
WhatsApp photo drug dealer caught by 'groundbreaking' work
Whisky-dave news:3691461b-d3dc-4d32-99b6-
Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:57:35 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote: On Thursday, 26 April 2018 23:39:01 UTC+1, Diesel wrote: you two get a room. ROFL. If I'd taken the time to read some of the other threads you participate in, I wouldn't have wasted the time to try and explain what sort of person it is you're dealing with. For you, I'd have kept my mouth shut and watched as he taught you, the hard way. No worries, I'm confident there's plenty of time yet for you to learn. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = Help! I've got a cat in my lap and I can't get up! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What Rihanna says about Whitney Houston's drug habit and more | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | November 13th 07 05:51 AM |
Major Short Squeeze Likely / FDA Drug Approval | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | June 21st 06 10:04 PM |
Major Short Squeeze Likely / FDA Drug Approval | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 21st 06 09:04 PM |
Major Short Squeeze Likely / FDA Drug Approval | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 21st 06 09:04 PM |
Drug store processing cost | Wa6tkq | Film & Labs | 1 | October 8th 03 05:44 PM |