If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
From personal experience and also what I've read, I would have to say
that the percentage of 'on' exposures in the Nikon D80 is crappy. I bought mine as it was being touted as a backup to the D200. It may have the same image sensor, but functionally it's got a long way to go. My D70 was far better at nailing exposures, and my D200 is a delight - 100 percent accurate exposures. My sense is that in this high technology age, bad exposures - and we are talking blown highlights, using Nikon Matrix Metering - this should be a thing of the past. Nikon, if you are listening (and I KNOW you are) please give us a D80 firmware upgrade that fixes the crappy expsoure problem. But on this subject, I have also heard that the D80 actaully exposes correctly and that the fault lies in the tone curve. I was told that if used "nikon software" I could create my own. I currently have Capture NX for my Nikon software. I am wondering - are there any D80 users out there who have successfully overcome this exposure problem using custom tone curves? Is there are a tutorial on how to create them? Thanks much for any help. And also, if anyone has any custom curves they can send, it would be helpful. And Nikon - please listen to your users. Canon is so far ahead of you, you can't afford to alienate little people like me - so fix the damn problem!!!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
"spydersweb34" wrote in message ups.com... From personal experience and also what I've read, I would have to say that the percentage of 'on' exposures in the Nikon D80 is crappy. I bought mine as it was being touted as a backup to the D200. It may have the same image sensor, but functionally it's got a long way to go. My D70 was far better at nailing exposures, and my D200 is a delight - 100 percent accurate exposures. My sense is that in this high technology age, bad exposures - and we are talking blown highlights, using Nikon Matrix Metering - this should be a thing of the past. Nikon, if you are listening (and I KNOW you are) please give us a D80 firmware upgrade that fixes the crappy expsoure problem. But on this subject, I have also heard that the D80 actaully exposes correctly and that the fault lies in the tone curve. I was told that if used "nikon software" I could create my own. I currently have Capture NX for my Nikon software. I am wondering - are there any D80 users out there who have successfully overcome this exposure problem using custom tone curves? Is there are a tutorial on how to create them? Thanks much for any help. And also, if anyone has any custom curves they can send, it would be helpful. And Nikon - please listen to your users. Canon is so far ahead of you, you can't afford to alienate little people like me - so fix the damn problem!!!! This appears to be basically the same post regarding D80 tone curves that you asked on 11/7/2007 in rec.photo.digital NG. My response is there for your review. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
Steve Smith wrote:
"Boskey" wrote in message This appears to be basically the same post regarding D80 tone curves that you asked on 11/7/2007 in rec.photo.digital NG. My response is there for your review. Would you mind please sharing the answer with the rest of us.. I can't seem to get the posts from that dat on that group. Did you check the DejaNews archive? Although it has been purchased by Google and their web interface to Usenet stinks I have to admit that Google does still maintain the archive and archive searches do work reasonably well. jue |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
"Steve Smith" wrote in message ... i found the info.. What Nikon software do you need to upload curves? steve From my previous response to OP: "I have read in other NG's that this is common in the D80 matrix meter. On the Nikonian website they often refer to Thom Hogan's take on the subject. His review is here, http://www.bythom.com/d80review.htm He did have some curves included with his D200 eBook, perhaps he has some available in his D80 eBook. I have tried curves on my D200 from here, http://fotogenetic.dearingfilm.com/ They were okay, but I later did some modifications. You will need Nikon software to load the curves into your camera and to modify them to suit your own tastes. Camera Control Pro is needed. It was originally part of Nikon Capture, but I don't think Capture supports the D80." Additional information can be found: http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcf...nf=DCConfI D9 http://www.jtgraphics.net/all_digital.htm http://fotogenetic.dearingfilm.com/c...ne_curves.html http://www.rawmagick.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
"spydersweb34" wrote in message ups.com... From personal experience and also what I've read, I would have to say that the percentage of 'on' exposures in the Nikon D80 is crappy. I bought mine as it was being touted as a backup to the D200. It may have the same image sensor, but functionally it's got a long way to go. My D70 was far better at nailing exposures, and my D200 is a delight - 100 percent accurate exposures. My sense is that in this high technology age, bad exposures - and we are talking blown highlights, using Nikon Matrix Metering - this should be a thing of the past. Nikon, if you are listening (and I KNOW you are) please give us a D80 firmware upgrade that fixes the crappy expsoure problem. But on this subject, I have also heard that the D80 actaully exposes correctly and that the fault lies in the tone curve. I was told that if used "nikon software" I could create my own. I currently have Capture NX for my Nikon software. I am wondering - are there any D80 users out there who have successfully overcome this exposure problem using custom tone curves? Is there are a tutorial on how to create them? Thanks much for any help. And also, if anyone has any custom curves they can send, it would be helpful. And Nikon - please listen to your users. Canon is so far ahead of you, you can't afford to alienate little people like me - so fix the damn problem!!!! In my ignorance I have 2 Nikon D80's and, in nearly every case, my exposures are "spot on". My histograms are about as good as I might want. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
Frank Arthur wrote:
"spydersweb34" wrote in message ups.com... From personal experience and also what I've read, I would have to say that the percentage of 'on' exposures in the Nikon D80 is crappy. I bought mine as it was being touted as a backup to the D200. It may have the same image sensor, but functionally it's got a long way to go. My D70 was far better at nailing exposures, and my D200 is a delight - 100 percent accurate exposures. My sense is that in this high technology age, bad exposures - and we are talking blown highlights, using Nikon Matrix Metering - this should be a thing of the past. Nikon, if you are listening (and I KNOW you are) please give us a D80 firmware upgrade that fixes the crappy expsoure problem. But on this subject, I have also heard that the D80 actaully exposes correctly and that the fault lies in the tone curve. I was told that if used "nikon software" I could create my own. I currently have Capture NX for my Nikon software. I am wondering - are there any D80 users out there who have successfully overcome this exposure problem using custom tone curves? Is there are a tutorial on how to create them? Thanks much for any help. And also, if anyone has any custom curves they can send, it would be helpful. And Nikon - please listen to your users. Canon is so far ahead of you, you can't afford to alienate little people like me - so fix the damn problem!!!! In my ignorance I have 2 Nikon D80's and, in nearly every case, my exposures are "spot on". My histograms are about as good as I might want. I've got a D70; if it's left in 'auto' it tends to overexpose somewhat. Easily correctable, though correction is unnecessary if you take it to a more manual setting. Aperture priority shoots bang on.. P. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
"Frank Arthur" wrote:
"spydersweb34" wrote in message oups.com... Nikon, if you are listening (and I KNOW you are) please give us a D80 firmware upgrade that fixes the crappy expsoure problem. But on this subject, I have also heard that the D80 actaully exposes correctly and that the fault lies in the tone curve. I was told that if used "nikon software" I could create my own. I currently have Capture NX for my Nikon software. I am wondering - are there any D80 users out there who have successfully overcome this exposure problem using custom tone curves? Is there are a tutorial on how to create them? Thanks much for any help. And also, if anyone has any custom curves they can send, it would be helpful. And Nikon - please listen to your users. Canon is so far ahead of you, you can't afford to alienate little people like me - so fix the damn problem!!!! In my ignorance I have 2 Nikon D80's and, in nearly every case, my exposures are "spot on". My histograms are about as good as I might want. You are probably judging exposure correctly though! That, of course, helps greatly... Using a histogram or the blink on over exposure to determine "correct" exposure, and then shooting RAW and manipulating each image (particularly exposure, gamma value and linearity) during conversion from RAW to an image format makes the discussion of "tone curves" a bit pointless. But for those who do not want to spend time post processing images on an individual basis, finding a "tone curve" that most closely matches their needs is a very useful objective. The problem is that it is often described a an "exposure" problem, and in reality it is not. It's a gamma curve problem that is part of post processing (whether done in the camera or manually afterwards). Whatever, I've recently seen several different people in a variety of forums bring this up in regard to the Nikon D80. One of the more interesting discussions was on the UFRAW discussion group on sourceforge.net, where maintainer Udi Fuchs discussed it with a couple of fairly well informed users. One result was someone posted a very interesting URL: http://fotogenetic.dearingfilm.com/ In particular, this article: http://fotogenetic.dearingfilm.com/c...ne_curves.html I did get a good laugh out of something on page two, where it discusses a list of "misconceptions". The number 9 item discussion starts like this: Misconception 9: I don't need custom tone curves becaue I like to post-process every image. Response: You are a sado-masochistic, self-flagellant individual with highly developed computer skills. ... Heh heh, what can we say... ;-) -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
Not so: http://www.toneupstudio.com/ After seeing your response, I went ahead and purchased this program. I will give it a run and see how it compares to Nikon Camera Control Pro. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
To Floyd Davidson
this is separate from the tone curve question, but I do see the merits of your comments. Believe it or not, I have been a photographer for over 40 years. My first camera was a 4X5. I KNOW how to judge exposure. As to looking at blinks and histograms, you can use an ancient non-auto Nikkor and fumble around until you get the right exposure. I never had to deal with Nikon Matrix Metering overexposure on any other Nikon DLSRs to the degree I've had to do on the D80. My point is, I should be able to get a REASONABLE approximation of the exposure from using the "on' Matrix Metered setting. with the D80 If I am shooting the same subject and they move a little, the exposure can fluctuate wildly. this is not right, because it forces you to look at the blink, perhaps missing an important shot. that's my beef and I am sticking to it!! I will attempt to start shooting RAW more, as I have been working strictly with jpegs and don't like the hassle and time constraints of RAW. Merci Thomas |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon D80 Custom tone curves
spydersweb34 wrote:
To Floyd Davidson this is separate from the tone curve question, but I do see the merits of your comments. Believe it or not, I have been a photographer for over 40 years. My first camera was a 4X5. I KNOW how to judge exposure. If your experience is with film, you'll almost certainly get it wrong at first with digital. Different beast! But if you shoot JPEG, you'll most likely be sticking with the same concepts used with film, and some of the distinctions can be annoying. As to looking at blinks and histograms, you can use an ancient non-auto Nikkor and fumble around until you get the right exposure. I never had to deal with Nikon Matrix Metering overexposure on any other Nikon DLSRs to the degree I've had to do on the D80. My point is, I should be able to get a REASONABLE approximation of the exposure from using the "on' Matrix Metered setting. with the D80 If I am shooting the same subject and they move a little, the exposure can fluctuate wildly. this is not right, because it forces you to look at the blink, perhaps missing an important shot. that's my beef and I am sticking to it!! I wouldn't say you are wrong! I'm certainly seeing more people complaining about it with the D80 than with other Nikon models. And, near as I can tell, all of those complaining are in much the same boat you are. They shoot JPEG, and simply want a metering system the gives them the desired result without having to shoot RAW. I will attempt to start shooting RAW more, as I have been working strictly with jpegs and don't like the hassle and time constraints of RAW. I'm sort of on the other end of the stick. I shoot RAW all the time, and don't particularly trust *any* metering system. I typically shoot in Manual Exposure mode, and determine the settings by looking at the blink on exposure LCD display. It is then my responsibility, not the camera's, to notice if/when the lighting changes from one shot to the next. The problem that I have with metering systems is that they change too much when the *subject* changes, as opposed to when the lighting changes. That is inherent in a reflected light metering system, but of course matrix metering is intended to put a little "judgement" into what the meter says. It just isn't enough... -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
d80 CUSTOM TONE CURVES | spydersweb34 | Digital Photography | 5 | November 8th 07 11:13 AM |
Nikon D70 RAW + custom curves question... | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | July 17th 05 10:34 AM |
D2H Custom Tone Curves? | Stealth | Digital Photography | 5 | April 1st 05 08:02 AM |
D2H Custom Tone Curves? | Stealth | Digital Photography | 0 | March 31st 05 06:02 AM |