Sony have a dust problem

Look he

https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

Two big blobs in the sky at moderate apertures (F6.3). Even more
visible if you process the image for more contrast.

Seems the A6600 has an inadequate sensor cleaning system.
--
Alfred Molon

Olympus 4/3 and micro 4/3 cameras forum at
https://groups.io/g/myolympus
https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site

In article , Alfred
Molon wrote:

Look he

https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

two broken links.

use delimiters.

Two big blobs in the sky at moderate apertures (F6.3). Even more
visible if you process the image for more contrast.

Seems the A6600 has an inadequate sensor cleaning system.

it doesn't mean that at all.

nothing is perfect. every camera is susceptible to dust.

In article ,
RichA wrote:



https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

two broken links.

use delimiters.


They weren't broken, they worked fine.

both were broken.

On 01/12/2019 01:45, RichA wrote:
On Saturday, 30 November 2019 10:10:42 UTC-5, nospam wrote:
In article , Alfred
Molon wrote:

Look he

https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

two broken links.

use delimiters.


They weren't broken, they worked fine.

They were broken for me (using Thunderbird)

https://4.img-dpreview.com/files/p/s...3118586416.jpg

https://4.img-dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

I've not noticed 'delimiters' make a difference though.

In article , Paul Carmichael
wrote:


https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

two broken links.

use delimiters.

They weren't broken, they worked fine.

They were broken for me (using Thunderbird)

Ditto. I wonder if there is a way to change that behaviour.

use a better newsreader. thunderbird is a buggy mess and its authors do
not give a **** about fixing anything.

On 01/12/2019 11:11, nospam wrote:
In article , Paul Carmichael
wrote:


https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

two broken links.

use delimiters.

They weren't broken, they worked fine.

They were broken for me (using Thunderbird)

Ditto. I wonder if there is a way to change that behaviour.

use a better newsreader. thunderbird is a buggy mess and its authors do
not give a **** about fixing anything.

WHICH newsreader do you recommend for those folk using macOS Catalina?

On 01/12/2019 11:11, nospam wrote:
In article , Paul Carmichael
wrote:


https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

two broken links.

use delimiters.

They weren't broken, they worked fine.

They were broken for me (using Thunderbird)

Ditto. I wonder if there is a way to change that behaviour.

use a better newsreader. thunderbird is a buggy mess and its authors do
not give a **** about fixing anything.


That's a bit harsh. The broken link thing is the only problem I've had.
What I would like, though, is a better filter to work across NGs on
idiot trolls.

Oh hello, FFS, I see another post has just popped up and yet another nym
.. . .

--
Cheers, Rob

In article , RJH
wrote:


They were broken for me (using Thunderbird)

Ditto. I wonder if there is a way to change that behaviour.

use a better newsreader. thunderbird is a buggy mess and its authors do
not give a **** about fixing anything.


That's a bit harsh.

not really. it's an accurate description, and actually understates just
how bad it is.

The broken link thing is the only problem I've had.

luck.

On 12/1/19 2:48 AM, David wrote:
On 01/12/2019 01:45, RichA wrote:
On Saturday, 30 November 2019 10:10:42 UTC-5, nospamÂ* wrote:
In article , Alfred
Molon wrote:

Look he

https://4.img-
dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg

and

https://www.dpreview.com/sample-gall...707/sony-e-70-
350mm-f4-5-6-3-g-oss/3775434615

two broken links.

use delimiters.

They weren't broken, they worked fine.

They were broken for me (using Thunderbird)

https://4.img-dpreview.com/files/p/s...3118586416.jpg


https://4.img-dpreview.com/files/p/sample_galleries/9323717707/3118586416.jpg


I've not noticed 'delimiters' make a difference though.

Most links, with or without "delimiters" get broken for me in
Thunderbird. OTOH, I usually don't have a problem with highlighting the
broken link, and copying and pasting into Firefox.

Using the delimiters does make a difference: it shuts up 'nospam', who
will shortly tell us that Thunderbird is no good, and you should use
another newsreader. Don't bother asking for his recommendation, he'll
tell you to research that for yourself.

--
Ken Hart

In article , Ken Hart
wrote:


Most links, with or without "delimiters" get broken for me in
Thunderbird.

that's because thunderbird is crap and it's authors don't give a ****.

OTOH, I usually don't have a problem with highlighting the
broken link, and copying and pasting into Firefox.

that won't always work, depending on how broken it is.

copy/paste this and see how well that works out for you:
http://www.
cnn.
com/

well written software makes a properly delimited link clickable, even
when it has embedded whitespace, quotation marks, line endings, etc.,
such as the link above.

poorly written software forces the user to do the work the computer
should be doing, and what's worse is people try to justify this as
normal and acceptable.