A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Wedding - which 35mm films to use



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 2nd 04, 04:44 AM
hba1c
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Hickey" wrote in message ...
"hba1c" wrote in message
om...


NPS, either one, but all from the same batch and w/ the same flash. No lab
is going to correct each frame. You could wind up w/ a lot of good shots
rejected "cause of the color cast on a few. Bob Hickey


What does "Individually video analyzed" mean when I see "Film
Processing / Proofing" on a list of service? I have only sent my
films to labs that provided that service.
  #22  
Old October 2nd 04, 08:44 AM
zeitgeist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Two of my friends are getting married. They don't have the funds to
hire a photographer so they were just going to put disposable cameras
around and use those photos. They asked me to take a few shots. By
chance I have studio equipment (Photogenic PowerLights®, Photogenic
PhotoMaster). I was planning to take some posed shots with my studio
lights before the ceremony. The want a shot coming down the aisle and
just two or three during the ceremony. I can use flash when the are
coming down the aisle but not during the ceremony. I don't know what
the lighting situation is in the church.

I was planning on taking Portra 100NC for the posed shots, coming down
the aisle, and some candid shots at the reception. I was thinking
Portra 400NC or Porta 800 for during the ceremony. I was also
thinking a roll of Reala.

They know to take what the get since I am not a professional. Without
me, they will not have much of anything so...

I will be traveling 250 miles the day before and I may not have access
to refrigeration. Any thoughts?


refrigeration is not that critical, do you think they ship it across the
country through deserts and the plains in refrigerated trucks? I think not.

so, what kind of paper does your lab run? A lot of folks would reply it
shouldn't make that much difference, which is my reply to the question of
film, it does astonish me that of all the concerns about shooting the
wedding, the first and only question asked is, what film?

do a google groups search on my name as there are lots of posts on how to
shoot weddings


  #24  
Old October 2nd 04, 01:54 PM
Randall Ainsworth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Marc 182
wrote:

1. Don't do it.


An option. Leaves the couple with snaps taken with disposable plastic
cameras scattered around. Do you really think that's a better result
than what an interested and alert amateur can produce with a good 35mm?


OK, screw it up and make enemies for life.

2. Use medium format.


Not an option. They don't have the money to pay for that. Sometimes
people just can't afford your snobbery.


It's not snobbery, but then you amateurs just wouldn't understand.

I wish they would take safety warning labels off of things and allow
the idiots of the world to kill themselves.
  #25  
Old October 2nd 04, 02:05 PM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Means the lab uses a device that allows them to see
the image as a positive image before printing. All color
and contrast adjustment is done, similar to how
you would do it in Photoshop. End result still depends
on the operators perception and how closely they
are paying attention. Perhaps no better or worse than
a good mini lab were someone actually cares.


In article ,
(hba1c) wrote:

"Bob Hickey" wrote in message
...
"hba1c" wrote in message
om...


NPS, either one, but all from the same batch and w/ the same flash. No lab
is going to correct each frame. You could wind up w/ a lot of good shots
rejected "cause of the color cast on a few. Bob Hickey


What does "Individually video analyzed" mean when I see "Film
Processing / Proofing" on a list of service? I have only sent my
films to labs that provided that service.


--
LF Website @
http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #26  
Old October 2nd 04, 03:21 PM
Matt McGrattan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 07:44:11 GMT, "zeitgeist"
wrote:


Two of my friends are getting married. They don't have the funds to
hire a photographer so they were just going to put disposable cameras
around and use those photos. They asked me to take a few shots. By
chance I have studio equipment (Photogenic PowerLights®, Photogenic
PhotoMaster). I was planning to take some posed shots with my studio
lights before the ceremony. The want a shot coming down the aisle and
just two or three during the ceremony. I can use flash when the are
coming down the aisle but not during the ceremony. I don't know what
the lighting situation is in the church.

I was planning on taking Portra 100NC for the posed shots, coming down
the aisle, and some candid shots at the reception. I was thinking
Portra 400NC or Porta 800 for during the ceremony. I was also
thinking a roll of Reala.

They know to take what the get since I am not a professional. Without
me, they will not have much of anything so...

I will be traveling 250 miles the day before and I may not have access
to refrigeration. Any thoughts?



Best of luck.

We couldn't afford a photographer at our wedding and we intended to
just rely on friends with point and shoots. However one friend turned
up with his SLR and asked us if we wanted him to take a few shots.

The results -- taken outdoors in natural light -- were excellent and
are really the only good pictures we have of the wedding [although
some of the point and shoot stuff from the drinks after are nice].

Loads of people keep saying that if you screw up the wedding shots you
will lose friends, etc.

Frankly that's a load of crap -- if your friends are the kind of
people who'll fall out with a friend over photos they've asked him to
take as a favour then they're not really worth having as friends
anyway.

Our friend took some shots - they were great. If they hadn't been
great or even if they'd be dreadful we wouldn't have minded -- it was
just a nice gesture on his part to offer to take some pictures.

People need to get less uptight about it. It's not as if you're being
paid for the job and your friends are forewarned.

Anyway, how often have you shot a few rolls of film and NONE of the
pictures come out well? Not often I'd bet.

Hope it all works out.

Matt


  #27  
Old October 2nd 04, 04:30 PM
The Wogster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

hba1c wrote:
I appreciate your advice! As I said I don't do this very often. The
church is 250 miles from my home so I will not see it until the day of
the event or maybe the night before. I am just going to have to use
the ISO 400 or 800 whichever will work.


Maybe grab a roll of Ilford Delta 1600 or 3200, these are B&W T-grain
films, but with 3200ASA you should be able to just make out the sleeping
Black cat in the coal bin at midnight, with overcast conditions. If the
light is really bad, then use those for the service and keep the colour
for where you can control the light better. Considering that the Bride
is wearing a white dress, and the groom a Black suit, who needs colour?

Actually I am not working. I believe I am the only one that will be
attending the wedding that will have anything but a point and shoot or
less. I am doing this as a favor to them. I have told them several
times that I am not a professional and that it could work out okay or
not so okay. I really think I could satisfy them by taking a few
shots with my camera on automatic with my flash and flash bracket.


Hmmm, maybe this would be a good opportunity, do something unusual, like
B&W, many labs that can handle B&W will print them on colour paper, with
the filterpack set for a nice sepia toning. Looks like it could have
been done in 1904 as easily as 2004, especially if your using a grainy
film, because of low light. These are the kinds of photos that people
hang on the wall, because they have so few of this kind of photo.

Since I am doing this as a favor, I can't really afford to shoot rolls
of film before the event. I have used Kodak VPS and similar many
times with acceptable results. I doubt using Portra will be a
problem.

I am an amateur and guest at the wedding with some professional
equipment and a little knowledge doing a favor for two friends. I
would never agree to do a wedding for money.


I would make the resulting photos your wedding gift to them, so film and
processing costs should be kept within reason. A test roll is to save
you using a film you don't know, and not liking the result.

W




  #28  
Old October 2nd 04, 04:47 PM
The Wogster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"hba1c" wrote in message


I will be traveling 250 miles the day before and I may not have access
to refrigeration. Any thoughts? Portra or


Take two half gallon (2L) pop or water bottles, drink the pop (get one
you like), then fill with water to within 20% of the top, put in the
freezer a few days before. Get one of those cheap Styrofoam coolers
(Under $5 at Walmart). When your ready to leave, take the film boxes
and put them in the cooler inside a plastic shopping bag (no holes),
along with your frozen bottles. The frozen bottles will suck up any
heat as it thaws, keeping your film nice and cold. The plastic bottles
will keep the water from getting everywhere. This works in warm
weather if the temps are less then 50F/10C then don't worry about it.

W
  #29  
Old October 2nd 04, 05:02 PM
Randall Ainsworth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Gregory Blank wrote:

Means the lab uses a device that allows them to see
the image as a positive image before printing. All color
and contrast adjustment is done, similar to how
you would do it in Photoshop. End result still depends
on the operators perception and how closely they
are paying attention. Perhaps no better or worse than
a good mini lab were someone actually cares.


I hate to get technical here, but it's called a VCNA - Kodak Video
Color Negative Analyzer.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I need to transfer my digital files to 35mm slides and negatives output and other film format outputs? Chris Digital Photography 5 September 25th 04 07:43 AM
advantage of high $ 35mm optics vs. MF now lost? Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 30 September 12th 04 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.