If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
advantage of power pack strobes over mono lights?
I have owned White Lightening strobes for a number of years and
like them a great deal. I was wondering what the advantage in a power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? The only advantage I can think of is more power out of one head. Are there others? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Sam Carleton" wrote in message
... I have owned White Lightening strobes for a number of years and like them a great deal. I was wondering what the advantage in a power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? The only advantage I can think of is more power out of one head. Are there others? Advantages (or differences, that are advantages in some situations) that apply to all pack systems: - More power (this is item numbers 1, 2, 3, and 10 on the top ten reasons list...) - You control the heads from the pack, so it is like having remotes for every head that is attached - especially useful with a head in an unreachable position on a boom arm, tucked behind furniture, or inside a lightbank, say. How helpful this is depends on how sophisticated the pack is - independent assymetric power control is great, but costly; - A monolight is (almost always) in the form of a 'standard' flash head - if you want to use ring-lights, striplights, boxlights, fish-fryers, etc. you (almost always) need a pack system; - The same set of heads can be used with, say, a 6000Ws pack in the studio and a 1500Ws pack when you want to go lightweight on location; - A pack head weighs less than a monolight, especially a high power one, so with tall stands, booms, etc. you have less weight at the top, and can put the heavy pack at the bottom; - Every head attached to the pack fires when you trigger the pack, so you don't need to worry about whether slaves can 'see' each other; - If you have three monolights plus one that you use only seldom, you'll have to remember to charge and fire it every now and again just to keep the cap.s formed, whereas if you have a pack system the cap.s get exercised every time you use any head with it; - The client thinks big packs look very impressive, and the assistant develops huge biceps shifting them; ;-) Advantages that can apply, but don't within every system: - A pack plus, say, three heads is lighter than three monolights of the same power (this isn't true as often as it should be); - A pack plus, say, three heads is cheaper than three monolights of the same power (this only tends to apply at the higher power end); - Potentially faster recycling; - Extra short flash duration tubes may be available for packs but not monolights in some systems; - In the case of really sophisticated controls, you save by having the electronics in only one place rather than duplicated; - Pack heads may be lighter and more robust than monolights; - Bitube and Quadtube heads necessitate a pack system. With multiple power packs you can use a bitube either plugged into two packs for more power and shorter recycling, or plugged into one for shorter flash durations; - Some systems have accessories for things like sequential flash, interval timing, etc. that only work with packs; - Some systems have full remote (sometimes wireless) control for packs, but less often for monolights; Possible disadvantages: - Packs can be _very_ heavy, though some of the newest are surprisingly light; - For anything up to, say, about three heads at about 500Ws or so each, packs will probably cost a _lot_ more than monolights; - If you have a pack and three heads, and the pack dies, you have nothing: if you have three monolights and one dies, you still have two monolights... Peter (who uses both.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Sam Carleton" wrote in message
... I have owned White Lightening strobes for a number of years and like them a great deal. I was wondering what the advantage in a power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? The only advantage I can think of is more power out of one head. Are there others? Advantages (or differences, that are advantages in some situations) that apply to all pack systems: - More power (this is item numbers 1, 2, 3, and 10 on the top ten reasons list...) - You control the heads from the pack, so it is like having remotes for every head that is attached - especially useful with a head in an unreachable position on a boom arm, tucked behind furniture, or inside a lightbank, say. How helpful this is depends on how sophisticated the pack is - independent assymetric power control is great, but costly; - A monolight is (almost always) in the form of a 'standard' flash head - if you want to use ring-lights, striplights, boxlights, fish-fryers, etc. you (almost always) need a pack system; - The same set of heads can be used with, say, a 6000Ws pack in the studio and a 1500Ws pack when you want to go lightweight on location; - A pack head weighs less than a monolight, especially a high power one, so with tall stands, booms, etc. you have less weight at the top, and can put the heavy pack at the bottom; - Every head attached to the pack fires when you trigger the pack, so you don't need to worry about whether slaves can 'see' each other; - If you have three monolights plus one that you use only seldom, you'll have to remember to charge and fire it every now and again just to keep the cap.s formed, whereas if you have a pack system the cap.s get exercised every time you use any head with it; - The client thinks big packs look very impressive, and the assistant develops huge biceps shifting them; ;-) Advantages that can apply, but don't within every system: - A pack plus, say, three heads is lighter than three monolights of the same power (this isn't true as often as it should be); - A pack plus, say, three heads is cheaper than three monolights of the same power (this only tends to apply at the higher power end); - Potentially faster recycling; - Extra short flash duration tubes may be available for packs but not monolights in some systems; - In the case of really sophisticated controls, you save by having the electronics in only one place rather than duplicated; - Pack heads may be lighter and more robust than monolights; - Bitube and Quadtube heads necessitate a pack system. With multiple power packs you can use a bitube either plugged into two packs for more power and shorter recycling, or plugged into one for shorter flash durations; - Some systems have accessories for things like sequential flash, interval timing, etc. that only work with packs; - Some systems have full remote (sometimes wireless) control for packs, but less often for monolights; Possible disadvantages: - Packs can be _very_ heavy, though some of the newest are surprisingly light; - For anything up to, say, about three heads at about 500Ws or so each, packs will probably cost a _lot_ more than monolights; - If you have a pack and three heads, and the pack dies, you have nothing: if you have three monolights and one dies, you still have two monolights... Peter (who uses both.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I was wondering what the advantage in a
power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? For portraiture... 1. Less weight aloft (e.g. hairlight), so lighter light stands can be used. 2. Lighter couterweights to balance the head on a boom, further lessening the weight aloft. 3. Easier adjust light intensity and change lighting ratios, because you control from the power pack, so you don't have to climb to adjust power. 4. Fewer AC outlets to find (or fewer light strips to use) Yes, White Lightning has ability to use optional control box connected to monolights with phone cords, so Item 3 is not an advantage if you own the control box, but then you have just increased the number of cords running to the lights (fewer cords is one advantage that WL has advertised, and the control unit negates that advantage). For architectural work... 1. On the other hand, monolights have the advantage that each head ADDS more light, not merely dividing the one available max power of a single power pack. 2. And you can light a wider area (e.g. large room easily without dropping the power to the head because of long cables. 3. And for architectural work, the AC cords can be hidden behind furniture without the power cables that have to go back to a power pack. So you see that the choice of one vs. the other is highly dependent upon what YOU need to shoot! --Wilt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I have owned White Lightening strobes for a number of years and like them a great deal. I was wondering what the advantage in a power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? The only advantage I can think of is more power out of one head. Are there others? I think the rush to mono heads was started cause they are much cheaper for the amount of light out put. I think a small pack mounted on the side of a light stand makes a lot more sense than a mono head attached way at the top of a thin metal rod. the main advantage comes when you travel, especially for wedding photogs, or home portrait shooters. You can carry the entire thing in one hand nicely balanced from a handle on the pack. the head can stay mounted at the top, the umbrella, I love to use a 40x50 westcott halo that opens like an umbrella but you shoot through it like a softbox. you can wrap the cable around it to hold the halo and carry it from the car, set up in a minute, rap it up in a minute. Norman makes the only one I've seen designed to do this, Photogenic makes a tiny power pack with enough power for 4 heads but didn't put a clamp mount or hard point to do so. The norman unit can be powered off a battery too, but that's expensive. I haven't been looking at what's available lately, but IIRC the small packs are only 200 or 400 ws of power, adequate for old fashioned lighting set ups like silver umbrellas up close, a bit under powered for large softboxes, especially if you are shooting at f/16 like some do. I prefer f/4 or 5.6 so it doesn't matter much to me. btw, by large softbox I think of large wall to wall curtains of light, not a typical softbox of 30x40 or so. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have owned White Lightening strobes for a number of years and like them a great deal. I was wondering what the advantage in a power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? The only advantage I can think of is more power out of one head. Are there others? I think the rush to mono heads was started cause they are much cheaper for the amount of light out put. I think a small pack mounted on the side of a light stand makes a lot more sense than a mono head attached way at the top of a thin metal rod. the main advantage comes when you travel, especially for wedding photogs, or home portrait shooters. You can carry the entire thing in one hand nicely balanced from a handle on the pack. the head can stay mounted at the top, the umbrella, I love to use a 40x50 westcott halo that opens like an umbrella but you shoot through it like a softbox. you can wrap the cable around it to hold the halo and carry it from the car, set up in a minute, rap it up in a minute. Norman makes the only one I've seen designed to do this, Photogenic makes a tiny power pack with enough power for 4 heads but didn't put a clamp mount or hard point to do so. The norman unit can be powered off a battery too, but that's expensive. I haven't been looking at what's available lately, but IIRC the small packs are only 200 or 400 ws of power, adequate for old fashioned lighting set ups like silver umbrellas up close, a bit under powered for large softboxes, especially if you are shooting at f/16 like some do. I prefer f/4 or 5.6 so it doesn't matter much to me. btw, by large softbox I think of large wall to wall curtains of light, not a typical softbox of 30x40 or so. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have owned White Lightening strobes for a number of years and like them a great deal. I was wondering what the advantage in a power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? The only advantage I can think of is more power out of one head. Are there others? I think the rush to mono heads was started cause they are much cheaper for the amount of light out put. I think a small pack mounted on the side of a light stand makes a lot more sense than a mono head attached way at the top of a thin metal rod. the main advantage comes when you travel, especially for wedding photogs, or home portrait shooters. You can carry the entire thing in one hand nicely balanced from a handle on the pack. the head can stay mounted at the top, the umbrella, I love to use a 40x50 westcott halo that opens like an umbrella but you shoot through it like a softbox. you can wrap the cable around it to hold the halo and carry it from the car, set up in a minute, rap it up in a minute. Norman makes the only one I've seen designed to do this, Photogenic makes a tiny power pack with enough power for 4 heads but didn't put a clamp mount or hard point to do so. The norman unit can be powered off a battery too, but that's expensive. I haven't been looking at what's available lately, but IIRC the small packs are only 200 or 400 ws of power, adequate for old fashioned lighting set ups like silver umbrellas up close, a bit under powered for large softboxes, especially if you are shooting at f/16 like some do. I prefer f/4 or 5.6 so it doesn't matter much to me. btw, by large softbox I think of large wall to wall curtains of light, not a typical softbox of 30x40 or so. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I have owned White Lightening strobes for a number of years and like them a great deal. I was wondering what the advantage in a power pack strobe system is over that of the mono light system? The only advantage I can think of is more power out of one head. Are there others? I think the rush to mono heads was started cause they are much cheaper for the amount of light out put. I think a small pack mounted on the side of a light stand makes a lot more sense than a mono head attached way at the top of a thin metal rod. the main advantage comes when you travel, especially for wedding photogs, or home portrait shooters. You can carry the entire thing in one hand nicely balanced from a handle on the pack. the head can stay mounted at the top, the umbrella, I love to use a 40x50 westcott halo that opens like an umbrella but you shoot through it like a softbox. you can wrap the cable around it to hold the halo and carry it from the car, set up in a minute, rap it up in a minute. Norman makes the only one I've seen designed to do this, Photogenic makes a tiny power pack with enough power for 4 heads but didn't put a clamp mount or hard point to do so. The norman unit can be powered off a battery too, but that's expensive. I haven't been looking at what's available lately, but IIRC the small packs are only 200 or 400 ws of power, adequate for old fashioned lighting set ups like silver umbrellas up close, a bit under powered for large softboxes, especially if you are shooting at f/16 like some do. I prefer f/4 or 5.6 so it doesn't matter much to me. btw, by large softbox I think of large wall to wall curtains of light, not a typical softbox of 30x40 or so. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|