If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Not to me. I do not mind if _other people_ want digital, but those that shifted away from Kodak Elite Fine Art paper means Kodak did not make enough money to keep making it. So I have to do with something else, and am not thrilled. I can still get fibre-based paper, and may switch totally to Ilford's Multigrade IV on the theory that that way I will have only two boxes of paper instead of 6 to go bad when it gets too hot in my darkroom, and Ilford may still be big enough to stay in business. It's changed chemical based photgraphy from a specialty item that every small town had at least one store and large cities had many, to something that can only be gotten from a few specialty retailers. There are still lots of camera stores around, and almost every large store has some sort of photographic equipment or supplies, but the comsumables have shifted to batteries, memory cards and inkjet paper. Sadly to say, IMHO 9/11 had a profound negative effect. While digital supplies can easily be shipped via air and are not damaged by X-ray or gamma ray scanners, light sensitive material are and chemicals can no longer be sent by air mail, checked in baggage etc. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
It's changed chemical based photgraphy from a specialty item that every small town had at least one store and large cities had many, to something that can only be gotten from a few specialty retailers. That's for sure. There were two real photo labs in the next town to me, and one 1-hour one there too. There is a one-hour lab still in my town. There is also a drug store in this town that will sell 36mm color negative film and have it processed. And one in the next town. One of the real photo labs also sold 35mm cameras and darkroom supplies. Both real photo labs are now out of business. One of the one-hour labs is out of business. And I do not go to one-hour labs anyway. About 15 miles from here there was a quite good (for around here) store that had an extensive photography department that had a good selection of cameras, enlargers, processors, sheet film as well as 120 and 35mm. Fishkin Brothers of Perth Amboy. Fortunately, Calumet and B&H are still in the wet-process photography business, though their selections are reduced compared to when I started in the 1970s. I do not look forward to emulsion making and film and paper coating. There are still lots of camera stores around, and almost every large store has some sort of photographic equipment or supplies, but the comsumables have shifted to batteries, memory cards and inkjet paper. Sadly to say, IMHO 9/11 had a profound negative effect. While digital supplies can easily be shipped via air and are not damaged by X-ray or gamma ray scanners, light sensitive material are and chemicals can no longer be sent by air mail, checked in baggage etc. I do not know if 9/11 had much of an effect. I doubt my stuff from Calumet came by air anyway, and there would be no point in sending stuff by air from B&H, since they are only about 60 miles from here. They would need to charter a small plane anyway and that does not make sense. The only chemistry that B&H won't ship is Kodak Rapid Fixer Part B, and I do not need that anyway. And Calumet will ship it, so I am not sure what is going on there. I guess the only "dangerous" stuff I use is glacial acetic acid, and a gallon goes a long way. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 06:10:01 up 10:12, 5 users, load average: 4.11, 4.10, 4.05 |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
That's for sure. There were two real photo labs in the next town to me, and one 1-hour one there too. There is a one-hour lab still in my town. There is also a drug store in this town that will sell 36mm color negative film and have it processed. And one in the next town. One of the real photo labs also sold 35mm cameras and darkroom supplies. Both real photo labs are now out of business. One of the one-hour labs is out of business. And I do not go to one-hour labs anyway. About 15 miles from here there was a quite good (for around here) store that had an extensive photography department that had a good selection of cameras, enlargers, processors, sheet film as well as 120 and 35mm. Fishkin Brothers of Perth Amboy. Fortunately, Calumet and B&H are still in the wet-process photography business, though their selections are reduced compared to when I started in the 1970s. I do not look forward to emulsion making and film and paper coating. Here it went from 5 stores to 2, one of which is just selling off what it had 5 years ago. Tel Aviv, which is the BIG city here has none now. The one really big photo store is still doing a booming digital business, but I bought the last of a few of their items, which were old stock. The one store that has anything has lots of film, but their darkroom department is two shelves about a meter wide. There is a nice display case with old cameras, but they are for display, not sale. I do not know if 9/11 had much of an effect. I doubt my stuff from Calumet came by air anyway, and there would be no point in sending stuff by air from B&H, since they are only about 60 miles from here. They would need to charter a small plane anyway and that does not make sense. The only chemistry that B&H won't ship is Kodak Rapid Fixer Part B, and I do not need that anyway. And Calumet will ship it, so I am not sure what is going on there. I guess the only "dangerous" stuff I use is glacial acetic acid, and a gallon goes a long way. It will for imported items, as anything that goes on a commerical flight is x-rayed, and containers are often gamma-ray scanned. Some of the courier services don't x-ray all packages, but how long that lasts is another speculation. I assume one day, if you want to send film via an airplane you will have to pay extra for hand inspection and certification of contents. Film can be shipped by container, but again you will have to make sure that nowhere along the way it is scanned, and that it goes in the winter as a summer trip in the hold of a container ship can ruin it. I was a fan of Edwal FG-7, which last I checked was still made by a company which bought the name and formula from Falcon who bought it from Edwal. However the post 9/11 air safety regulations make it a hazzardous substance so the only way I can get any is to find someone willing to buy a case, ship it via boat (there is no more surface mail), and get an import permit for it. I can avoid the import permit by buying one or two bottles and no more, but it still would have to be "shipped" and not mailed. :-( I can only assume that as commercial production of photographic material and chemicals moves from the U.S. to "botique" producers overseas, it will get worse. For example how long will a company continue to import film from eastern Europe or China if someone does not read the contents declaration, or does not care, and runs it through a gama ray scanner? There is an old story here about someone ordering a box of sheet film from abroad and the customs agent opening the box and looking at each sheet to make sure it did not have a pornographic image. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I can only assume that as commercial production of photographic material and chemicals moves from the U.S. to "botique" producers overseas, it will get worse. While I was never a fan of VC paper, I think I will have to go with Ilford Multigrade IV as the least boutique of the manufacturers still in business. I think I will be able to print on that once I learn how. I do have a VC cold light head (Zone VI) that can print with pure green all the way to pure blue. But I will have to calibrate my negatives and the VC head's control box, and I do not look forward to that. For example how long will a company continue to import film from eastern Europe or China if someone does not read the contents declaration, or does not care, and runs it through a gama ray scanner? There is an old story here about someone ordering a box of sheet film from abroad and the customs agent opening the box and looking at each sheet to make sure it did not have a pornographic image. That actually happened at a small defense contractor where I once worked. We needed to X-ray some parts (machined castings) for flaws, and the QC guy opened the X-ray film to count the sheets and measure their size. As Ansel Adams once asked, when discussing the latest "progress in photography, "Why is there so much progress and so little improvement?" -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 08:55:01 up 12:57, 4 users, load average: 4.07, 4.20, 4.17 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
"Jean-David Beyer" wrote
As Ansel Adams once asked, when discussing the latest "progress in photography, "Why is there so much progress and so little improvement?" It is the same everywhere. Meaningless monkey-motion is often taken as progress. OTOH: real knowledge only comes from mistakes - to find the one true path you first have to explore every wrong one, and there seem to be an infinite number of wrong paths. Maybe Intelligent Design ["God's great idea": man's great mistake] and Evolution ["God's great mistakes": man's great idea] _are_ one and the same. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters http://www.darkroomautomation.com/index2.htm n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
In article _U93k.903$8q2.402@trnddc02,
Jean-David Beyer wrote: Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: I can only assume that as commercial production of photographic material and chemicals moves from the U.S. to "botique" producers overseas, it will get worse. While I was never a fan of VC paper, I think I will have to go with Ilford Multigrade IV as the least boutique of the manufacturers still in business. Harman (who own Ilford's wet photography product lines) bought Kentmere last year and claim they'll keep the Kentmere papers in production. The Kentmere multigrade paper is, in my opinion, a lot nicer than Ilford Multigrade. -- Thor Lancelot Simon "My guess is that the minimal training typically provided would only have given the party in question multiple new and elaborate ways to do something incomprehensibly stupid and dangerous." -Rich Goldstone |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
In article _U93k.903$8q2.402@trnddc02, Jean-David Beyer wrote: Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: I can only assume that as commercial production of photographic material and chemicals moves from the U.S. to "botique" producers overseas, it will get worse. While I was never a fan of VC paper, I think I will have to go with Ilford Multigrade IV as the least boutique of the manufacturers still in business. Harman (who own Ilford's wet photography product lines) bought Kentmere last year and claim they'll keep the Kentmere papers in production. The Kentmere multigrade paper is, in my opinion, a lot nicer than Ilford Multigrade. I wonder about Kentmere. B&H stock it, but Calumet do not. That makes me worry about how available it will be, even if Harman continue to make it. I had to give up using Ilford Galerie because no-one around here stocked it. (Of course, no one around here stocks any wet process stuff except 35mm color negative film now.) Then I had to give up Oriental Seagull. Then Kodak quit making any B&W paper, especially Elite Fine Art. If I must recalibrate all over again, I just want to do it once. So the question is, can I rely on B&H to keep stocking it for, say, 10 years or more? I have never used either Ilford Multigrade or Kentmere, I do not have a prejudice one way or the other, but I worry about the long-term availability in USA. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 19:45:01 up 22 min, 4 users, load average: 5.10, 4.47, 3.25 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
In article _U93k.903$8q2.402@trnddc02, Jean-David Beyer wrote: Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: I can only assume that as commercial production of photographic material and chemicals moves from the U.S. to "botique" producers overseas, it will get worse. While I was never a fan of VC paper, I think I will have to go with Ilford Multigrade IV as the least boutique of the manufacturers still in business. Harman (who own Ilford's wet photography product lines) bought Kentmere last year and claim they'll keep the Kentmere papers in production. The Kentmere multigrade paper is, in my opinion, a lot nicer than Ilford Multigrade. Kentmere have this to say about development: "To maximise d. max, grade spacing and tonal rendition, a multicontrast chemical system such as Kentmere VC Select Plus Developer and Fixer, especially formulated to enhance variable contrast emulsions' characteristics, is recommended. Also recommended, in alphabetical order are Agfa Multicontrast, Champion B&W Multicontrast, Ilford Multigrade, Kodak Polymax, and Tetenal Variospeed developers, together with their appropriate fixers. Equivalent products from other manufacturers should give similar results. "We do not recommend conventional manual developers, which tend to inhibit both d. max and contrast." I would normally use something like Dektol or D-72 (both 1+1) to develop paper. I have used my version of D-72 which is the same as the original, but I omit the bromide and use benzotriazole instead. This prevented the "green" color of Polycontrast Rapid that I have not used in decades, and may no longer be necessary. Have you found it necessary to use their recommended developers? -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 20:05:01 up 42 min, 4 users, load average: 4.05, 4.18, 3.93 |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
In article rIE3k.8112$lE3.5293@trnddc05,
Jean-David Beyer wrote: Kentmere have this to say about development: "To maximise d. max, grade spacing and tonal rendition, a multicontrast chemical system such as Kentmere VC Select Plus Developer and Fixer, especially formulated to enhance variable contrast emulsions' characteristics, is recommended. Also recommended, in alphabetical order are Agfa Multicontrast, Champion B&W Multicontrast, Ilford Multigrade, Kodak Polymax, and Tetenal Variospeed developers, together with their appropriate fixers. Equivalent products from other manufacturers should give similar results. "We do not recommend conventional manual developers, which tend to inhibit both d. max and contrast." This is bizarre. Among other minor issues, Polymax paper developer -- as far as anyone seems to be able to tell -- *is* Ektaflo Type 1, which was basically liquid Dektol concentrate. I have had no trouble with the Kentmere paper in Dektol. I have also used Edwal Ultra Black with good results. -- Thor Lancelot Simon "My guess is that the minimal training typically provided would only have given the party in question multiple new and elaborate ways to do something incomprehensibly stupid and dangerous." -Rich Goldstone |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
C41 rotary development
Kentmere VC Select Plus Developer
Based on nothing more than the name I would say the whole thing is crap designed to sell overpriced cheesy developer. The more "Ultra Plus Select Elite Extra Superlative Reserve" there is in the name the more utterly mundane the product. If a country's name includes "Democratic" it is invariably a dictatorship, includes "Peoples" it means the people are screwed, "Socialist" and the populace's basic social needs are not met, and "Workers Paradise" means dying of black lung by the age of 30. A "Superlative Chronometer" keeps worse time than the watch you got for free with a Time Magazine subscription. "Special" attached to the side of a car means "Stripped: Three in the tree and dog-dish hubcaps". The "Ultra Plus" model is invariably the bottom of the product line. A simple "Plus" means cost-reduced. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters http://www.darkroomautomation.com/index2.htm n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bronica GS-1 rotary finder question | seog | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 0 | January 28th 06 01:59 AM |
b/w rotary processing - what works for you? | Ralf R. Radermacher | In The Darkroom | 8 | March 8th 05 01:20 AM |
New 400TX Rotary X's Too short | Indheatec | In The Darkroom | 3 | July 25th 04 01:00 AM |
Speed of a rotary tube processor | Manuel \(MrFloyd\) Portillo Pérez | In The Darkroom | 11 | June 18th 04 02:49 PM |