If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Tony wrote: Some of us got into photography because we didn't have the drawing skills we wanted. What I have noticed over the years though is that relatively few photographers are interested in it as art. They have never studied art, don't look at art and talk only of the technical aspects. For once I am agreeing with Tony, perhaps I should be concerned! But I think it's entirely true that most texts on photography, and discussions by photographers, are very, very poor on "art", and by "art" I do *not* mean "artzy", far from it; too many people, especially amongst photographers, seem to have the naive misconception that "art" is something you do whimsically, with a twist of the waist and a mess in the mind, but that *******ization is far from the truth. In fact, "art" has been formalised since antiquity and refined over the millenia, and it could easily take a lifetime to get familiar with; it is literally a discipline, in that it requires immense discipline. I think in photography it would be useful to distinguis between the "craft", and the "art". The "craft" is all issues of equipment and "technique", particular to photography, but photography really has *no* "art" that should set it apart from drawing, painting, sculpture, architecture, cinematography or any visual medium; "art" is just "art", and to be illiterate in it, and too many are, won't be changed by a practice of the "craft" of photography, however long or frequent, regardless of how many cameras you own or years you've used them for. Those who come from a background of "fine arts" though, the formally trained ones at least, and their texts, seem rich on the "education" of art. The best photographers I have seen are those who come from a background of painting, drawing, sculpture, architechture or so on, not .. Their "art" may not be obvious to all. And here it is useful to distinguish between "art" and "taste"; like I said before, "art" is a language that has its conventions and formalities, and though you may "break the rules", it's usually evident when an "artist" "breaks the rules" that they are quite familiar with them, rather than when someone who is clueless about them does it, which, unfortunately in common misconception, they usually have no rules to start with yet they want to "break the rules"! "Taste" on the other hand, is whether you like a thing or not, and too often people mistake it for "art". A piece of "art", if you've trained yourself or had been formally trained, can be admired regardless of taste, and in fact, that should be the case. The more you learn about "art", the more your tastes develop, and become aligned to what "art" actually is, hence an "artistic taste"; a little akin to wine, but not to confuse here, the more you learn about it, the more you appreciate a "fine wine" and its subtleties. I could've perhaps written more about this but I've just become distracted and my train of thought interrupted, and I have to go. Regards. In many ways they sound like the guys who put a supercharged bored and stroked mill into a 36 Ford -- right after they destroy the lines of it by chopping it and painting flames on the cutaway fenders. -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message oups.com... Hi, I had a small discussion with some members of my photography club on post-processing. Some thoroughly enjoy PP and come out with superb results. Then there are the likes of me who hate to sit on a computer and work on Photoshop. Everytime I open a photo editor, there is a deep rooted disinterest in doing all the complicated PP. I am also not too much into portraits and *artistic* photography. Prefer lanscapes and architecture more. So here's what I am wondering. Does photography have different sides that attracts people with different leanings? I, for example, work in IT Security. I enjoy machines (all sorts), coding, and hacking. I can at the most identify 5-6 colours. I am attracted to photography because I enjoy producing nice looking photographs and less often some candid portriats. - Siddhartha |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Books on Composition, developing an "Eye"? | William J. Slater | General Photography Techniques | 9 | April 7th 04 04:22 PM |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | elchief | In The Darkroom | 3 | April 7th 04 10:20 AM |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | John | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | April 7th 04 05:33 AM |
Study Photography in Venice | Venice School of Photography | General Photography Techniques | 0 | February 13th 04 06:17 PM |
Aerial Photography from Alaska, Yukon Territory & beyond | PNW | Photographing Nature | 0 | December 1st 03 11:19 AM |