If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
I post this as a warning for anyone researching this lens before purchase.
I have a Sony a200 and recently bought a Sigma 70-300mm zoom. The reviews say it makes great pictures and I agree, the optical performance is great, especially for a cheap-ish lens. What the reviews don't tell you is that this lens was designed before Sony started fitting more powerful focus motors to their range of bodies. The extra torque from the newer motor is clearly too much for the plastic gears in the lens and mine lasted just two months before failing with stripped teeth. Subsequent research shows I'm not alone. Sigma appear to be in denial as emails to them have either been ignored or in one case I've simply been told they will repair it under warrantee. Remember that's a two month old lens - I elected to get a refund from the retailer instead but that's another story for later. So if you're in the market for a telephoto zoom for a Sony alpha body which has their "fast focus" motor be warned that the Sigma is just not up to the job. If you decide to buy one anyway please remember to post a note on usenet if/when it fails so as to warn others. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
In article , Calvin Sambrook
wrote: I post this as a warning for anyone researching this lens before purchase. I have a Sony a200 and recently bought a Sigma 70-300mm zoom. The reviews say it makes great pictures and I agree, the optical performance is great, especially for a cheap-ish lens. What the reviews don't tell you is that this lens was designed before Sony started fitting more powerful focus motors to their range of bodies. The extra torque from the newer motor is clearly too much for the plastic gears in the lens and mine lasted just two months before failing with stripped teeth. Subsequent research shows I'm not alone. that's actually a common failure for sigma lenses, not just on sony cameras. Sigma appear to be in denial as emails to them have either been ignored or in one case I've simply been told they will repair it under warrantee. Remember that's a two month old lens - I elected to get a refund from the retailer instead but that's another story for later. good move. So if you're in the market for a telephoto zoom for a Sony alpha body which has their "fast focus" motor be warned that the Sigma is just not up to the job. If you decide to buy one anyway please remember to post a note on usenet if/when it fails so as to warn others. just avoid sigma lenses http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.09.12/the-sigma-saga http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.09.20/lens-repair-data-20 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
In article , John Navas
wrote: just avoid sigma lenses Amen. You tend to get what you pay for. generally true but some sigma lenses are not cheap. for instance, the sigma 300-800 is $10k and the 120-300 is $3200 (b&h). the 120-300 aspires to be #1 for being unreliable, with an 84.6% failure rate. you just can't get failure rates like that when you pay less! http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.09.20/lens-repair-data-20 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
"nospam" wrote in message
... In article , John Navas wrote: just avoid sigma lenses Amen. You tend to get what you pay for. generally true but some sigma lenses are not cheap. for instance, the sigma 300-800 is $10k and the 120-300 is $3200 (b&h). the 120-300 aspires to be #1 for being unreliable, with an 84.6% failure rate. you just can't get failure rates like that when you pay less! http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.09.20/lens-repair-data-20 I'm deeply shocked. For a commercial rental company to openly criticize a major supplier in the way that lensrentals have done is almost unheard of. They must be absolutely certain of their position. And what a position, of Sigma they say: "Our techs coined the phrase "Sigma'd" to describe any lens that didn't function." "[Sigma's] repair turnaround time was, to be charitable, leisurely." "Sigma was about 5% of our rentals but almost one-third of our customer complaints." I wish I'd known about that site before buying. So any recommendations for a cheap-end (ie. sub £200, it's a hobby after all) tele zoom for a Sony? My current thoughts are to buy a Sony brand lens as surely that must be matched to the body, but they get poor optical reviews. Are Tamron any good? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
In article , Calvin Sambrook
wrote: So any recommendations for a cheap-end (ie. sub £200, it's a hobby after all) tele zoom for a Sony? My current thoughts are to buy a Sony brand lens as surely that must be matched to the body, but they get poor optical reviews. Are Tamron any good? some are and some aren't. it depends on the lens. the tamron 90mm macro is outstanding, and one of the best macro lenses made. on the other hand, the tamron 200-400mm was horrible, truly horrible. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
In rec.photo.digital nospam wrote:
In article , Calvin Sambrook wrote: So any recommendations for a cheap-end (ie. sub 200, it's a hobby after all) tele zoom for a Sony? My current thoughts are to buy a Sony brand lens as surely that must be matched to the body, but they get poor optical reviews. Are Tamron any good? some are and some aren't. it depends on the lens. the tamron 90mm macro is outstanding, and one of the best macro lenses made. on the other hand, the tamron 200-400mm was horrible, truly horrible. Same goes for Sony lenses. Their 18-250mm zoom for example is a rebadged and slightly improved version of the highly respected 18-250mm Tamron. It's a rare manufacturer that makes no good lenses. And despite the weak focus gear teeth on some of their heavier long zooms, some of Sigma's lenses are very good too. -- Chris Malcolm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
Calvin Sambrook wrote:
I post this as a warning for anyone researching this lens before purchase. I have a Sony a200 and recently bought a Sigma 70-300mm zoom. The reviews say it makes great pictures and I agree, the optical performance is great, especially for a cheap-ish lens. What the reviews don't tell you is that this lens was designed before Sony started fitting more powerful focus motors to their range of bodies. The extra torque from the newer motor is clearly too much for the plastic gears in the lens and mine lasted just two months before failing with stripped teeth. Subsequent research shows I'm not alone. Sigma appear to be in denial as emails to them have either been ignored or in one case I've simply been told they will repair it under warrantee. Remember that's a two month old lens - I elected to get a refund from the retailer instead but that's another story for later. So if you're in the market for a telephoto zoom for a Sony alpha body which has their "fast focus" motor be warned that the Sigma is just not up to the job. If you decide to buy one anyway please remember to post a note on usenet if/when it fails so as to warn others. This has been a known problem for some time but it is good to raise it as a reminder. Further reading: http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008...the-sigma-saga |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
nospam wrote:
In article , Calvin Sambrook wrote: I post this as a warning for anyone researching this lens before purchase. I have a Sony a200 and recently bought a Sigma 70-300mm zoom. The reviews say it makes great pictures and I agree, the optical performance is great, especially for a cheap-ish lens. What the reviews don't tell you is that this lens was designed before Sony started fitting more powerful focus motors to their range of bodies. The extra torque from the newer motor is clearly too much for the plastic gears in the lens and mine lasted just two months before failing with stripped teeth. Subsequent research shows I'm not alone. that's actually a common failure for sigma lenses, not just on sony cameras. It has been a particular problem in the Sony community of late - eg: if it's bad on Nikon or Canon it is much worse with Sony bodies (from what I gather on various groups). Sigma appear to be in denial as emails to them have either been ignored or in one case I've simply been told they will repair it under warrantee. Remember that's a two month old lens - I elected to get a refund from the retailer instead but that's another story for later. good move. So if you're in the market for a telephoto zoom for a Sony alpha body which has their "fast focus" motor be warned that the Sigma is just not up to the job. If you decide to buy one anyway please remember to post a note on usenet if/when it fails so as to warn others. just avoid sigma lenses http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.09.12/the-sigma-saga http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.09.20/lens-repair-data-20 Yep. Whatever grudging acceptance I've had for Sigma has been reduced to "avoid" with the lensrentals saga. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:58:04 -0700, John Navas
wrote: Amen. You tend to get what you pay for. Not a 100% rule to follow. I'm happy with my Tokina AT-X 124 DX Pro 12-24mm f4 lens, which is substantially cheaper than the Nikon equivalent. Yes, it's not and AF-S lens, but I couldn't justify the delta cost for that. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma 70-300mm Sony/Minolta mount lens - a warning
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Calvin Sambrook wrote: I post this as a warning for anyone researching this lens before purchase. I have a Sony a200 and recently bought a Sigma 70-300mm zoom. The reviews say it makes great pictures and I agree, the optical performance is great, especially for a cheap-ish lens. What the reviews don't tell you is that this lens was designed before Sony started fitting more powerful focus motors to their range of bodies. The extra torque from the newer motor is clearly too much for the plastic gears in the lens and mine lasted just two months before failing with stripped teeth. Subsequent research shows I'm not alone. Sigma appear to be in denial as emails to them have either been ignored or in one case I've simply been told they will repair it under warrantee. Remember that's a two month old lens - I elected to get a refund from the retailer instead but that's another story for later. So if you're in the market for a telephoto zoom for a Sony alpha body which has their "fast focus" motor be warned that the Sigma is just not up to the job. If you decide to buy one anyway please remember to post a note on usenet if/when it fails so as to warn others. This has been a known problem for some time but it is good to raise it as a reminder. Further reading: http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008...the-sigma-saga When I first read that link last year - the most interesting question to me apart from the inordinate lengths they're going to blacken Sigma's reputation, is the fact that the company in question is based in Cordova Tennessee. Which with all due respect to Tennesseans is surely hardly anyone's idea of the lens hiring capital of the US, or of the world for that matter. Other than this outfit most of the big lens hirers appear to be over the counter outfits in big cities linked top retailers which branched out into mail hire with the growth of the internet. I'm surprised that nobody has ever stopped to question any of this. None of the other - mostly OTC big city - hirers websites who I checked both in the US and UK appear to have any problem with Sigma lenses at all. And from memory one big seller in the UK offers all lenses including Sigma on 2 weeks approval prior to purchase. michael adams .... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lens advice: Tamron 70-300 f/ 4-5.6 vs. Nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED vs. Sigma 70-300mm. Supra II Macro | Randall Ainsworth | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | July 25th 04 12:06 AM |
Lens advice: Tamron 70-300 f/ 4-5.6 vs. Nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED vs. Sigma 70-300mm. Supra II Macro | W Chan | Digital Photography | 5 | July 22nd 04 03:05 PM |
Lens advice: Tamron 70-300 f/ 4-5.6 vs. Nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED vs. Sigma 70-300mm. Supra II Macro | Thomas | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | July 21st 04 04:04 PM |
FA: Sigma 100-300mm lens, EF mount (UK) | David Hearn | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | June 29th 04 10:58 AM |