If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
sigma 18-35 lens problem?
hi group,
i recently acquired a sigma 18-35 lens for my nikon d70.whilst auto focusing on infinity with the lens set on the 35mm portion i cannot achieve focus lock inside the viewfinder,ie the green focus confirm light lower lhs inside viewfinder.is this a fault with the lens?or am i missing something here?many thanks for any reply.rgds to all from TBM... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 22/09/2004 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"tbm" wrote in message ... hi group, i recently acquired a sigma 18-35 lens for my nikon d70.whilst auto focusing on infinity with the lens set on the 35mm portion i cannot achieve focus lock inside the viewfinder,ie the green focus confirm light lower lhs inside viewfinder.is this a fault with the lens?or am i missing something here?many thanks for any reply.rgds to all from TBM... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 22/09/2004 What you are missing is a search of the many posts in this newsgroup warning you not to use Sigma or other aftermarket lenses with Nikons and Canons. In a nutshell, they say that you are not saving money by buying and using aftermarket lenses; you will spend more money (and time) because in the end you are going to throw away that Sigma lens and replace it with a Nikkor lens. The D70 is too good of a camera to denigrate it with an aftermarket lens. My opinion: if you want to use Sigma lenses, get a Sigma camera. You will then have a Sigma system, which will now function the way the manufacturer intended it to function. Just my opinion. My time and money is more valuable than someone else's time and money who doesn't listen to advice from people who have "been there, done that." Clyde Torres |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Clyde Torres" writes:
What you are missing is a search of the many posts in this newsgroup warning you not to use Sigma or other aftermarket lenses with Nikons and Canons. In a nutshell, they say that you are not saving money by buying and using aftermarket lenses; you will spend more money (and time) because in the end you are going to throw away that Sigma lens and replace it with a Nikkor lens. The D70 is too good of a camera to denigrate it with an aftermarket lens. There are some people that say that, but I've never owned a zoom lens made by my camera manufacturer, across 30+ years and 6 manufacturers, personally. These days the camera manufacturers make some first-rate zooms, and I do consider them, but the price/performance ratio hasn't lead me to buy one yet. When I started with zooms, the manufacturers didn't make zooms with decent specs -- they were all too slow for serious use. Also, the camera manufacturers have started making amateur-quality lenses. A top-line lens from Tokina is very likely to be better than an amateur-line lens from Nikon or Canon. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Clyde Torres" writes:
What you are missing is a search of the many posts in this newsgroup warning you not to use Sigma or other aftermarket lenses with Nikons and Canons. In a nutshell, they say that you are not saving money by buying and using aftermarket lenses; you will spend more money (and time) because in the end you are going to throw away that Sigma lens and replace it with a Nikkor lens. The D70 is too good of a camera to denigrate it with an aftermarket lens. There are some people that say that, but I've never owned a zoom lens made by my camera manufacturer, across 30+ years and 6 manufacturers, personally. These days the camera manufacturers make some first-rate zooms, and I do consider them, but the price/performance ratio hasn't lead me to buy one yet. When I started with zooms, the manufacturers didn't make zooms with decent specs -- they were all too slow for serious use. Also, the camera manufacturers have started making amateur-quality lenses. A top-line lens from Tokina is very likely to be better than an amateur-line lens from Nikon or Canon. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
And a mid range lens from Nikon or Canon will blow away anything
by Tokina, Sigma etc. Nikon's most poular lenses, e.g. the 24-85 f3.5, 4.5 and the 50mm f1.8 are produced in vast numbers and this provides a good price to quality ratio. Graham "David Dyer-Bennet" wrote in message ... "Clyde Torres" writes: There are some people that say that, but I've never owned a zoom lens made by my camera manufacturer, across 30+ years and 6 manufacturers, personally. These days the camera manufacturers make some first-rate zooms, and I do consider them, but the price/performance ratio hasn't lead me to buy one yet. When I started with zooms, the manufacturers didn't make zooms with decent specs -- they were all too slow for serious use. Also, the camera manufacturers have started making amateur-quality lenses. A top-line lens from Tokina is very likely to be better than an amateur-line lens from Nikon or Canon. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article , David Dyer-Bennet
wrote: There are some people that say that, but I've never owned a zoom lens made by my camera manufacturer, across 30+ years and 6 manufacturers, personally. These days the camera manufacturers make some first-rate zooms, and I do consider them, but the price/performance ratio hasn't lead me to buy one yet. When I started with zooms, the manufacturers didn't make zooms with decent specs -- they were all too slow for serious use. Also, the camera manufacturers have started making amateur-quality lenses. A top-line lens from Tokina is very likely to be better than an amateur-line lens from Nikon or Canon. The sting of low quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Digital vs Film - just give in! | [email protected] | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 159 | November 15th 04 04:56 PM |
canon 18-55 or sigma 18-50 lens for 300d?? | Gareth Tuckwell | Digital Photography | 7 | August 14th 04 05:32 PM |
Lens advice: Tamron 70-300 f/ 4-5.6 vs. Nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED vs. Sigma 70-300mm. Supra II Macro | D.R. | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | July 21st 04 11:30 PM |
A Kodak comment about a Sigma lens | David Kilpatrick | Digital Photography | 44 | July 13th 04 03:43 PM |
Opinions on Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3? | Bernd | 35mm Photo Equipment | 8 | June 17th 04 07:49 PM |