If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Clara" wrote:
As far as I can tell, the only thing lost is the interchangeable prisms. That matters not a whit to me, nor do I know any photographers by aquintance or word of mouth who change prisms by the job, or on any regular basis, for that matter. Nikon still have comparatively huge stocks of unsold alternative finders for the F4, and sold very, very few for the F5, hence their omission from the F6 specification. None of the D1/D2 series digital SLRs had/has interchangeable finders, and apparently there is no demand for them. It seems sensible not to offer something for which there is virtually no demand, and which adds significantly both to the cost of manufacture and to the risk of ingress of dust or moisture. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Clara" wrote:
As far as I can tell, the only thing lost is the interchangeable prisms. That matters not a whit to me, nor do I know any photographers by aquintance or word of mouth who change prisms by the job, or on any regular basis, for that matter. Nikon still have comparatively huge stocks of unsold alternative finders for the F4, and sold very, very few for the F5, hence their omission from the F6 specification. None of the D1/D2 series digital SLRs had/has interchangeable finders, and apparently there is no demand for them. It seems sensible not to offer something for which there is virtually no demand, and which adds significantly both to the cost of manufacture and to the risk of ingress of dust or moisture. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote:
I think they lost the 8 AA battery set too.....This is one of the things I like best about my F5. Being able to buy batteries at any 7-11 in the middle of the night..... Just buy the accessory AA battery pack. I suggest that most F6 owners will buy one, just as most F4 owners purchased an MB-21 or MB-23 battery pack. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote:
I think they lost the 8 AA battery set too.....This is one of the things I like best about my F5. Being able to buy batteries at any 7-11 in the middle of the night..... Just buy the accessory AA battery pack. I suggest that most F6 owners will buy one, just as most F4 owners purchased an MB-21 or MB-23 battery pack. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Clara wrote:
As far as I can tell, the only thing lost is the interchangeable prisms. That matters not a whit to me, nor do I know any photographers by aquintance or word of mouth who change prisms by the job, or on any regular basis, for that matter. Yet in the past when comparing the Maxxum 9 or EOS-1v to the F5 there are certain proponents who claim that the interchangeable VF is *so* essential to a professional ... so it is interesting to see that Nikon are simplifying the F6 to keep the costs down... those few who really *do* need the interchangeable vf's can of course resort to the F5 ... which has a well earned reputation for reliability and performance in the first place so they should be available for a while yet, both new and used. The F6 strategy seems to be as a film alternative for digital shooting pros who need to shoot a lot of film too. F6 is not the "extreme" pro camera that the F5 is but has all the essentials that most pros will want in a film camera. It is heartening to see them coming out with a full pro camera at this point... I wonder if Canon will too ... they seem to be pounding down the digital walls by preference. Sales will tell. Cheers, Alan -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Clara wrote:
As far as I can tell, the only thing lost is the interchangeable prisms. That matters not a whit to me, nor do I know any photographers by aquintance or word of mouth who change prisms by the job, or on any regular basis, for that matter. Yet in the past when comparing the Maxxum 9 or EOS-1v to the F5 there are certain proponents who claim that the interchangeable VF is *so* essential to a professional ... so it is interesting to see that Nikon are simplifying the F6 to keep the costs down... those few who really *do* need the interchangeable vf's can of course resort to the F5 ... which has a well earned reputation for reliability and performance in the first place so they should be available for a while yet, both new and used. The F6 strategy seems to be as a film alternative for digital shooting pros who need to shoot a lot of film too. F6 is not the "extreme" pro camera that the F5 is but has all the essentials that most pros will want in a film camera. It is heartening to see them coming out with a full pro camera at this point... I wonder if Canon will too ... they seem to be pounding down the digital walls by preference. Sales will tell. Cheers, Alan -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
"TP" wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote: I think they lost the 8 AA battery set too.....This is one of the things I like best about my F5. Being able to buy batteries at any 7-11 in the middle of the night..... Just buy the accessory AA battery pack. I suggest that most F6 owners will buy one, just as most F4 owners purchased an MB-21 or MB-23 battery pack. Yes....On re-reading the specs, I see that such a thing is available...I do wonder where they put it. Does it hang on the bottom of the camera, extending it's height to approximately the same as the F5? |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne wrote:
other bells and whistles, like the built in databack, inter-volvo-meter, etc. Then there's the full metal body, including the back, beter meter, better autofocus, mirror lockup, faster motordrive, shutter monitor, and a Shutter monitor? WTF is that? Nikon shutters are extremely reliable in this class ... not something of value to monitor it, IMO. Something that will tell you when you need need to go to a Nikon service center because your shutter just fired at the wrong speed compared to what it was supposed to. Or do you have a use for a shuuter that fires at say 5% less on speeds above 1/2000? super hightech shutter made in collaboration with DuPont. The list goes on About time they caught up to Minolta (Max 9 [1998] uses carbon fibre reinforced epoxy blades and shoots to 1/12,000 (1/300 sync)). Are there really subjects needing more than 1/8000? And I don't mean shooting bright sunlight dyatime scenes with ISO 1600 film and large apertures. and on. If this is an improved F100, it's improvements are generational, at the very least. I expected that the "F6" would be better than an "F5" in all respects. Maybe that's the wrong way to look at it... but by going to a fixed VF, slower sync, etc. etc. they've taken away some of the king-of-the-hill pro appeal. Cheers, Alan. -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne wrote:
other bells and whistles, like the built in databack, inter-volvo-meter, etc. Then there's the full metal body, including the back, beter meter, better autofocus, mirror lockup, faster motordrive, shutter monitor, and a Shutter monitor? WTF is that? Nikon shutters are extremely reliable in this class ... not something of value to monitor it, IMO. Something that will tell you when you need need to go to a Nikon service center because your shutter just fired at the wrong speed compared to what it was supposed to. Or do you have a use for a shuuter that fires at say 5% less on speeds above 1/2000? super hightech shutter made in collaboration with DuPont. The list goes on About time they caught up to Minolta (Max 9 [1998] uses carbon fibre reinforced epoxy blades and shoots to 1/12,000 (1/300 sync)). Are there really subjects needing more than 1/8000? And I don't mean shooting bright sunlight dyatime scenes with ISO 1600 film and large apertures. and on. If this is an improved F100, it's improvements are generational, at the very least. I expected that the "F6" would be better than an "F5" in all respects. Maybe that's the wrong way to look at it... but by going to a fixed VF, slower sync, etc. etc. they've taken away some of the king-of-the-hill pro appeal. Cheers, Alan. -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
In article sNI2d.317911$8_6.133850@attbi_s04,
William Graham wrote: "TP" wrote in message Just buy the accessory AA battery pack. I suggest that most F6 owners will buy one, just as most F4 owners purchased an MB-21 or MB-23 battery pack. Yes....On re-reading the specs, I see that such a thing is available...I do wonder where they put it. Does it hang on the bottom of the camera, extending it's height to approximately the same as the F5? Unfortunately the whole combination is even bigger than the F5: http://www.graysofwestminster.co.uk/...g=1&mem=&arc=Y Why on earth didn't they design it to accept internal AAs as an option? After all, the F100 can take either an AA or CR123 internal battery holder, without having to bother with the optional external grip. Richard. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It's Official: Nikon announces the D2X | Peter Lawrence | Digital Photography | 84 | September 21st 04 07:41 PM |
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) | Steven M. Scharf | Digital Photography | 104 | September 3rd 04 01:01 PM |
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) | Steven M. Scharf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 92 | September 3rd 04 01:01 PM |